Stockley Rachel C, Hanna Kerry, Connell Louise
Stroke Research Team, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE, UK.
School of Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Arch Physiother. 2020 Nov 30;10(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40945-020-00091-x.
Repetitive sensory stimulation (RSS) is a therapeutic approach which involves repeated electrical stimulation of the skin's surface to improve function. This rapid systematic review aimed to describe the current evidence for repetitive sensory stimulation (RSS) in rehabilitation of the upper-limb for people who have had a stroke.
Methods: Relevant studies were identified in a systematic search of electronic databases and hand-searching in February 2020. The findings of included studies were synthesized to describe: the safety of RSS, in whom and when after stroke it has been used, the doses used and its effectiveness.
Eight studies were included. No serious adverse events were reported. The majority of studies used RSS in participants with mild or moderate impairments and in the chronic stage after stroke. Four studies used RSS in a single treatment session, reporting significant improvements in strength and hand function. Findings from longitudinal studies showed few significant differences between control and experimental groups. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the heterogeneity of included studies.
This review suggests that there is insufficient evidence to support the use of RSS for the upper-limb after stroke in clinical practice. However, this review highlights several clear research priorities including establishing the mechanism and in whom RSS may work, its safety and optimal treatment parameters to improve function of the upper-limb after stroke.
重复性感觉刺激(RSS)是一种治疗方法,涉及对皮肤表面进行反复电刺激以改善功能。本快速系统评价旨在描述目前重复性感觉刺激(RSS)用于中风患者上肢康复的证据。
方法:2020年2月通过系统检索电子数据库和手工检索确定相关研究。综合纳入研究的结果以描述:RSS的安全性、中风后使用RSS的对象和时间、使用的剂量及其有效性。
纳入八项研究。未报告严重不良事件。大多数研究在轻度或中度功能障碍的参与者以及中风后的慢性期使用RSS。四项研究在单次治疗中使用RSS,报告力量和手部功能有显著改善。纵向研究结果显示对照组和实验组之间几乎没有显著差异。由于纳入研究的异质性,无法进行荟萃分析。
本评价表明,在临床实践中,尚无足够证据支持将RSS用于中风后的上肢康复。然而,本评价突出了几个明确的研究重点,包括确定RSS的作用机制、适用人群、安全性以及改善中风后上肢功能的最佳治疗参数。