Suppr超能文献

神经刺激增强脑卒中后 3-12 个月的中重度偏瘫患者的任务导向训练:一项随机试验。

Nerve Stimulation Enhances Task-Oriented Training for Moderate-to-Severe Hemiparesis 3-12 Months After Stroke: A Randomized Trial.

机构信息

From the Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (CC, ESP, KCC, LN, LS) and Biostatistics, College of Public Health (PMW), University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; HealthSouth Cardinal Hill Rehabilitation Hospital, Lexington, Kentucky (LN); Department of Neurology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky (LCP); Cardinal Hill Rehabilitation Hospital, Lexington, Kentucky (LS); and Department of Neurology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (LS).

出版信息

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Nov;97(11):808-815. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000971.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to determine whether somatosensory stimulation affects outcomes of motor training for moderate-to-severe upper limb hemiparesis less than 12 mos before stroke.

DESIGN

Fifty-five adults participated in 18 intervention sessions pairing 2 hours of active (n = 33) or sham (n = 22) somatosensory stimulation with 4 hours of intensive task-oriented motor training. Wolf Motor Function Test, Action Research Arm Test, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, and Stroke Impact Scale were administered at baseline, postintervention, and 1- and 4-mo follow-up.

RESULTS

Statistically significant between-groups differences favored the active condition on Wolf Motor Function Test at post (P = 0.04) and Action Research Arm Test at post (P = 0.02), 1 mo (P = 0.01), and 4 mos (P = 0.01) but favored the sham condition on Stroke Impact Scale at 1 mo (P = 0.03). There were no significant between-groups differences on Fugl-Meyer Assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Somatosensory stimulation can improve objective outcomes of motor training for moderate-to-severe hemiparesis less than 12 mos after stroke, although it needs to be determined whether the magnitude of between-groups differences in this study is clinically relevant. Future studies should investigate the intervention's impact on disability and functional recovery for this population as well as neurophysiological mechanisms underlying intervention effects.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定体感刺激是否会影响脑卒中前 12 个月内中重度上肢偏瘫患者的运动训练结果。

设计

55 名成年人参加了 18 次干预课程,将 2 小时的主动(n=33)或假(n=22)体感刺激与 4 小时的强化任务导向运动训练相结合。在基线、干预后以及 1 和 4 个月的随访时,分别进行 Wolf 运动功能测试、动作研究上肢测试、Fugl-Meyer 评估和中风影响量表评估。

结果

在 Wolf 运动功能测试(P=0.04)和动作研究上肢测试(P=0.02)的即刻、1 个月(P=0.01)和 4 个月(P=0.01)时,主动组的结果明显优于假组,而在 1 个月(P=0.03)时,假组的中风影响量表结果明显优于主动组。Fugl-Meyer 评估没有明显的组间差异。

结论

体感刺激可以改善脑卒中后 12 个月内中重度偏瘫患者的运动训练的客观结果,尽管需要确定本研究中组间差异的幅度是否具有临床意义。未来的研究应调查该干预措施对该人群残疾和功能恢复的影响,以及干预效果的神经生理学机制。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验