• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科烧伤-创伤患者与单纯创伤患者相比住院时间延长:倾向评分匹配分析。

Pediatric burn-trauma patients have increased length of stay compared to trauma-only patients: A propensity matched analysis.

机构信息

University of California, Irvine, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Orange, CA, USA.

University of California, Irvine, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Orange, CA, USA.

出版信息

Burns. 2021 Feb;47(1):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.04.029. Epub 2020 May 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2020.04.029
PMID:33293153
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trauma is the leading cause of mortality in children. Burn injury involves intensive resources, especially in pediatric patients. We hypothesized that among pediatric trauma patients, combined burn-trauma (BT) patients have increased length of stay (LOS) and mortality compared to trauma-only (T) patients.

METHODS

The Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2014-2016) was queried and BT patients were 1:2 propensity-score-matched to T patients based on age, gender, hypotension on admission, injury type and severity.

RESULTS

93 BT patients were matched to 186 T patients. There were no differences in matched characteristics. BT patients had a longer median LOS (4 vs 2 days, p<0.001) with no difference in mortality (1.1% vs 1.1%, p=1.00), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS (3 vs 3 days, p=0.55), or complications including decubitus ulcer (0% vs 1.1%, p=0.32), deep vein thrombosis (0% vs 0.5%, p=0.48), extremity compartment syndrome (1.1% vs 0%, p=0.16), and urinary tract infection (1.1% vs 1.1%, p=1.00).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric BT patients had twice the LOS compared to a matched group of pediatric T patients. There was no difference between the cohorts in ICU LOS, complications or mortality rate. When evaluating risk-stratified quality metrics such as LOS, concomitant burn injury should be incorporated.

摘要

背景

创伤是儿童死亡的主要原因。烧伤涉及大量资源,尤其是在儿科患者中。我们假设,在儿科创伤患者中,与单纯创伤(T)患者相比,合并烧伤-创伤(BT)患者的住院时间(LOS)和死亡率更高。

方法

查询小儿创伤质量改进计划(2014-2016 年),根据年龄、性别、入院时低血压、损伤类型和严重程度,将 BT 患者与 T 患者进行 1:2 的倾向评分匹配。

结果

93 例 BT 患者与 186 例 T 患者匹配。匹配特征无差异。BT 患者的中位 LOS 较长(4 天比 2 天,p<0.001),死亡率无差异(1.1%比 1.1%,p=1.00),重症监护病房(ICU) LOS 无差异(3 天比 3 天,p=0.55),并发症包括压疮(0%比 1.1%,p=0.32)、深静脉血栓形成(0%比 0.5%,p=0.48)、四肢间隔综合征(1.1%比 0%,p=0.16)和尿路感染(1.1%比 1.1%,p=1.00)。

结论

与匹配的儿科 T 患者相比,儿科 BT 患者的 LOS 增加了一倍。两组在 ICU LOS、并发症或死亡率方面无差异。在评估 LOS 等风险分层质量指标时,应考虑合并烧伤损伤。

相似文献

1
Pediatric burn-trauma patients have increased length of stay compared to trauma-only patients: A propensity matched analysis.儿科烧伤-创伤患者与单纯创伤患者相比住院时间延长:倾向评分匹配分析。
Burns. 2021 Feb;47(1):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.04.029. Epub 2020 May 8.
2
No Difference in Mortality Between Level I and II Trauma Centers for Combined Burn and Trauma.综合性烧伤和创伤患者在 I 级和 II 级创伤中心的死亡率无差异。
J Surg Res. 2020 Dec;256:528-535. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
3
Non-accidental trauma increases length of stay and mortality in pediatric trauma.非意外创伤会增加小儿创伤患者的住院时间和死亡率。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2019 Jul;35(7):779-784. doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04482-5. Epub 2019 May 10.
4
Obesity: influence on length of hospital stay for the pediatric burn patient.肥胖:对小儿烧伤患者住院时间的影响
J Burn Care Res. 2010 Mar-Apr;31(2):251-6. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181d0f549.
5
The associations between injury mechanism and extended hospital stay among pediatric patients: findings from a trauma Center in Saudi Arabia.损伤机制与沙特阿拉伯创伤中心儿科患者住院时间延长的相关性研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Jun 3;19(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1559-7.
6
Sex dimorphism in pediatric burn mortality in Malawi: A propensity matched analysis.马拉维儿科烧伤死亡率的性别二态性:倾向评分匹配分析。
Burns. 2021 Feb;47(1):228-233. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 May 19.
7
Evaluation of the effect of methamphetamine on traumatic injury complications and outcomes.评价甲基苯丙胺对创伤性损伤并发症和结局的影响。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2018 Mar 29;13(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13722-018-0112-6.
8
Analyzing the Impact of Concomitant COVID-19 Infection on Outcomes in Trauma Patients.分析合并 COVID-19 感染对创伤患者结局的影响。
Am Surg. 2024 Jun;90(6):1599-1607. doi: 10.1177/00031348241246176. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
9
The past 25 years of pediatric burn treatment in Graz and important lessons been learned. An overview.格拉茨过去25年的小儿烧伤治疗及重要经验教训。概述。
Burns. 2015 Jun;41(4):714-20. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.10.001. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
10
Burn induced nervous system morbidity among burn and non-burn trauma patients compared with non-injured people.烧伤和非烧伤创伤患者与未受伤人群相比,烧伤引起的神经系统发病率。
Burns. 2019 Aug;45(5):1041-1050. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.06.006. Epub 2019 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Emergency Department Disposition Times in Adult Level I and Level II Trauma Centers.一级和二级成人创伤中心急诊科处置时间的比较
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Nov;25(6):938-945. doi: 10.5811/westjem.20523.
2
Musculoskeletal Issues in Pediatric Burn Patients.小儿烧伤患者的肌肉骨骼问题
Semin Plast Surg. 2024 Apr 26;38(2):154-156. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1782651. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Quality indicators for hospital burn care: a scoping review.医院烧伤护理质量指标:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10980-7.
4
Perceptions and Experiences of Parents of Burn-Injured Children during Hospital Stay: A Need for Integrated Care.烧伤儿童家长在住院期间的认知与体验:综合护理的必要性。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 8;12(6):614. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060614.
5
The clinical characteristics and microbiological investigation of pediatric burn patients with wound infections in a tertiary hospital in Ningbo, China: A ten-year retrospective study.中国宁波一家三级医院小儿烧伤创面感染患者的临床特征及微生物学调查:一项十年回顾性研究
Front Microbiol. 2023 Jan 9;13:1034099. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1034099. eCollection 2022.