• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和验证一种现成的评分系统,以优先处理矫形和创伤科患者入院时的药物重整。

Development and validation of a ready-to-use score to prioritise medication reconciliation at patient admission in an orthopaedic and trauma department.

机构信息

Pharmacy, CHU Reims, Reims, France

Pharmacy, CHU Reims, Reims, France.

出版信息

Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2022 Sep;29(5):264-270. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002283. Epub 2020 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002283
PMID:33293282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9660597/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Medication reconciliation (MR) is recognised as an important tool in preventing medication errors such as unintentional discrepancies (UDs). The aim of this study was to identify independent predictive factors of UDs during MR at patient admission to an orthopaedic and trauma department. The secondary objective was to build and validate a ready-to-use score to prioritise patients.

METHOD

A retrospective study was performed on 3.5 years of pharmacist-led MR in the orthopaedic and trauma department of a large university teaching hospital. Independent predictors of UD were identified by multivariable logistic regression. A priority score to identify patients at risk of at least one UD was constructed from the odds ratios of the risk factors, and validated in a separate cohort. Performance was assessed with sensitivity, specificity, C-statistic and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit.

RESULTS

In total, 888 patients were included and 387 UDs were identified, mainly drug omissions (65.1%). Five independent predictors of UD were identified: age >75 years (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.41 to 3.00; p<0.001), admission during school holidays (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.44; p=0.005), female gender (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.53 to 3.16; p<0.001), emergency hospitalisation (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.92; p<0.001), and ≥5 medications on the best possible medication history (BPMH) (OR 3.29, 95% CI 2.20 to 4.94; p<0.001). Based on these predictors, a priority score ranging from 0 to 10 was built and internally and externally validated (C statistic 0.72, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the high prevalence of UD in patients admitted to orthopaedic and trauma surgery departments. Five independent predictive factors of UD during MR were identified (female gender, emergency hospitalisation, hospitalisation during school holidays, age ≥75 years, and ≥5 medicines on the BPMH). The developed risk score will help to prioritise MR among patients at risk of medication error and is ready-to-use in other orthopaedic and trauma departments.

摘要

目的

药物重整(MR)被认为是预防药物错误(如非故意差异[UD])的重要工具。本研究的目的是确定在骨科和创伤科患者入院时进行 MR 期间发生 UD 的独立预测因素。次要目的是构建和验证一个用于确定患者优先级的现成评分。

方法

对一家大型大学教学医院的骨科和创伤科进行的为期 3.5 年的药师主导的 MR 进行回顾性研究。通过多变量逻辑回归确定 UD 的独立预测因素。从危险因素的优势比构建了一个用于识别至少有一个 UD 风险患者的优先级评分,并在单独的队列中进行验证。使用灵敏度、特异性、C 统计量和 Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合优度评估性能。

结果

共纳入 888 例患者,共发现 387 例 UD,主要为药物漏用(65.1%)。确定了 UD 的五个独立预测因素:年龄>75 岁(OR 2.05,95%CI 1.41 至 3.00;p<0.001)、在学校假期期间入院(OR 1.69,95%CI 1.17 至 2.44;p=0.005)、女性(OR 2.20,95%CI 1.53 至 3.16;p<0.001)、紧急入院(OR 2.05,95%CI 1.45 至 2.92;p<0.001)以及最佳可能用药史(BPMH)上有≥5 种药物(OR 3.29,95%CI 2.20 至 4.94;p<0.001)。基于这些预测因素,构建了一个范围为 0 至 10 的优先级评分,并进行了内部和外部验证(C 统计量为 0.72,95%CI 0.67 至 0.76)。

结论

本研究证实了骨科和创伤外科患者入院时 UD 的高发生率。确定了 MR 期间发生 UD 的五个独立预测因素(女性、紧急入院、学校假期住院、年龄≥75 岁、BPMH 上有≥5 种药物)。开发的风险评分将有助于确定有药物错误风险的患者的 MR 优先级,并且可以在其他骨科和创伤外科部门中使用。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a ready-to-use score to prioritise medication reconciliation at patient admission in an orthopaedic and trauma department.开发和验证一种现成的评分系统,以优先处理矫形和创伤科患者入院时的药物重整。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2022 Sep;29(5):264-270. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2020-002283. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
2
The impact of pharmacist-led medication reconciliation during admission at tertiary care hospital.三级护理医院入院期间由药剂师主导的用药核对的影响。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Feb;40(1):196-201. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0568-6. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
3
Prevalence and risk factors for medication reconciliation errors during hospital admission in elderly patients.老年患者住院期间用药核对错误的患病率及危险因素。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Oct;38(5):1164-71. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0348-8. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
4
Clinical pharmacist-led program on medication reconciliation implementation at hospital admission: experience of a single university hospital in Croatia.临床药师主导的住院用药重整实施项目:克罗地亚一家大学医院的经验
Croat Med J. 2016 Dec 31;57(6):572-581. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2016.57.572.
5
Prevention of medication errors at hospital admission: a single-centre experience in elderly admitted to internal medicine.预防住院时的用药错误:内科老年患者的单中心经验
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Dec;40(6):1601-1613. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0737-2. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
6
The role of clinical pharmacist trainees in medication reconciliation process at hospital admission.临床药师实习生在入院时药物重整过程中的作用。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Apr;42(2):796-804. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01015-2. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
7
Medication reconciliation: Predictors of risk of unintentional medication discrepancies in the cardiology department.药物重整:心内科非计划性药物差异的风险预测因素。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Feb;112(2):104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2018.09.004. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
8
Medication Reconciliation at hospital admission and discharge: Evaluation of fidelity and process outcomes in a real-world setting.入院和出院时的药物重整:真实环境下的忠实度和流程结果评估。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;75(10):e14656. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14656. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
9
Clinical pharmacist's contribution to medication reconciliation on admission to hospital in Ireland.爱尔兰临床药师在入院药物重整中的贡献。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Feb;35(1):14-21. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9696-1. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
10
Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation to reduce discrepancies in transitions of care in Spain.药剂师主导的用药重整以减少西班牙转院过程中的差异。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Dec;35(6):1083-90. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9824-6. Epub 2013 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
A machine learning-based clinical predictive tool to identify patients at high risk of medication errors.一种基于机器学习的临床预测工具,用于识别有用药错误高风险的患者。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;14(1):32022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83631-w.
2
Bedside check of medication appropriateness (BED-CMA) as a risk-based tool for bedside clinical pharmacy services: A proof-of-concept study at the trauma surgery ward.床边用药适宜性检查(BED-CMA)作为床边临床药学服务的一种基于风险的工具:创伤外科病房的概念验证研究
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2023 Oct 21;22:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.10.017. eCollection 2023.
3
Best Possible Medication History Collection by Clinical Pharmacist in a Preoperative Setting: An Observational Prospective Study.临床药师在术前环境中收集最佳用药史:一项观察性前瞻性研究。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 Sep 8;11(5):142. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11050142.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical and economic impact of pharmacist interventions in an ambulatory hematology-oncology department.药剂师干预对门诊血液肿瘤科室的临床及经济影响。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2020 Jul;26(5):1172-1179. doi: 10.1177/1078155220915763. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
2
Validated prediction of imminent risk of fracture for older adults.老年人骨折近期风险的有效预测。
Am J Manag Care. 2020 Mar 1;26(3):e91-e97. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.42641.
3
Prevalence, clinical relevance and predictive factors of medication discrepancies revealed by medication reconciliation at hospital admission: prospective study in a Swiss internal medicine ward.入院时药物重整发现的药物差异的流行率、临床相关性和预测因素:瑞士内科病房的前瞻性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 27;9(5):e026259. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026259.
4
Clinical, Economic, and Organizational Impact of the Clinical Pharmacist in an Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery Department.临床药师在骨科和创伤外科部的临床、经济和组织影响。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1507-e1513. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000539.
5
The Prevalence and Nature of Medication Errors and Adverse Events Related to Preadmission Medications When Patients Are Admitted to an Orthopedic Inpatient Unit: An Observational Study.患者入住骨科住院病房时与入院前用药相关的用药错误和不良事件的发生率和性质:一项观察性研究。
Ann Pharmacother. 2019 Mar;53(3):252-260. doi: 10.1177/1060028018802472. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
6
Predictive factors for clinically significant pharmacist interventions at hospital admission.入院时具有临床意义的药师干预的预测因素。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(9):e9865. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009865.
7
Developing a decision rule to optimise clinical pharmacist resources for medication reconciliation in the emergency department.制定一项决策规则,以优化临床药师资源,用于急诊科的用药核对。
Emerg Med J. 2017 Aug;34(8):502-508. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205804. Epub 2017 May 10.
8
Improving medication safety: Development and impact of a multivariate model-based strategy to target high-risk patients.提高用药安全性:基于多变量模型的高危患者靶向策略的开发与影响
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 13;12(2):e0171995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171995. eCollection 2017.
9
Regression coefficient-based scoring system should be used to assign weights to the risk index.基于回归系数的评分系统应被用于为风险指数赋权。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;79:22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.031. Epub 2016 May 13.
10
Medication reconciliation at patient admission: a randomized controlled trial.患者入院时的用药核对:一项随机对照试验。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2016 Jan-Mar;14(1):656. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2016.01.656. Epub 2016 Mar 15.