Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 8;10(12):e040920. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040920.
Persons with intellectual disability (ID) are at a higher risk of developing dementia than persons without ID, with an expected earlier onset. Assessment methods for the general population cannot be applied for persons with ID due to their pre-existing intellectual and functional impairments. As there is no agreed-upon measure to assess dementia in persons with ID, multiple instruments for this purpose have been developed and adapted in the past decades. This review aimed to identify all available informant-based instruments for the assessment of dementia in persons with ID, to evaluate and compare them according to their measurement properties, and to provide a recommendation for the most suitable instruments. Additionally, an overview of the amount and quality of research on these instruments will be provided.
This review will be conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. We will adhere to the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines and use a set of characteristics developed for assessment instruments for persons with ID, the Characteristics of Assessment Instruments for Psychiatric Disorders in Persons with Intellectual Developmental Disorders. Two comprehensive, systematic literature searches will be applied in 10 international databases, including ASSIA, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, OpenGrey and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Risk of bias and quality assessment will be done according to COSMIN guidelines. We will apply the modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to rate the overall quality of the available evidence.
No ethics statement is needed for this study. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at international conferences.
智障人士(ID)患痴呆症的风险高于无智障人士,且发病时间更早。由于智障人士存在先天的智力和功能障碍,因此不能使用适用于一般人群的评估方法。由于目前尚无针对 ID 人群的痴呆症评估公认方法,过去几十年来已经开发和改编了多种用于此目的的工具。本综述旨在确定所有现有的基于知情者的 ID 人群痴呆症评估工具,根据其测量特性对其进行评估和比较,并为最合适的工具提供建议。此外,还将提供这些工具的研究数量和质量的概述。
本综述将根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行并报告。我们将遵循共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)准则,并使用为评估智障人士的工具制定的一组特征,即智障发展障碍者精神障碍评估工具的特征。将在 10 个国际数据库中进行两次全面、系统的文献检索,包括 ASSIA、CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆、ERIC、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Scopus、Web of Science、OpenGrey 和 ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global。根据 COSMIN 指南进行偏倚风险和质量评估。我们将使用改良的推荐、评估、制定和评估方法对现有证据的总体质量进行评分。
本研究不需要伦理声明。研究结果将提交给同行评议的期刊,并将在国际会议上展示。