Kraaijeveld Steven R
Wageningen University & Research.
Public Health Ethics. 2020 Mar 11;13(2):190-200. doi: 10.1093/phe/phaa005. eCollection 2020 Jul.
Preventive vaccination can protect not just vaccinated individuals, but also others, which is often a central point in discussions about vaccination. To date, there has been no systematic study of self- and other-directed motives behind vaccination. This article has two major goals: first, to examine and distinguish between self- and other-directed motives behind vaccination, especially with regard to vaccinating for the sake of third parties, and second, to explore some ways in which this approach can help to clarify and guide vaccination debates and policy. I propose conceiving of vaccination in terms of three basic elements: the vaccination decision-maker, the vaccine recipient and the primary beneficiary. I develop a taxonomy based on the relations between these elements to distinguish four kinds of vaccination: self-protective, paternalistic, altruistic and indirect. I finally discuss the case of human papillomavirus vaccine regulation for men and women to show how each kind of vaccination is associated with and raises specific ethical questions.
预防性疫苗接种不仅可以保护接种者本人,还可以保护其他人,这往往是疫苗接种讨论的核心要点。迄今为止,尚未有关于疫苗接种背后自我导向和他人导向动机的系统性研究。本文有两个主要目标:第一,审视并区分疫苗接种背后的自我导向和他人导向动机,尤其是为第三方接种疫苗的动机;第二,探索这种方法有助于澄清和指导疫苗接种辩论及政策的一些方式。我建议从三个基本要素来考量疫苗接种:疫苗接种决策者、疫苗接受者和主要受益者。我基于这些要素之间的关系制定了一种分类法,以区分四种疫苗接种类型:自我保护型、家长式、利他型和间接型。我最后讨论了针对男性和女性的人乳头瘤病毒疫苗监管案例,以展示每种疫苗接种类型是如何关联并引发特定伦理问题的。