Lenstrup C, Schantz A, Berget A, Feder E, Rosenø H, Hertel J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987;66(8):709-12. doi: 10.3109/00016348709004148.
In a prospective study, 88 women bathed in a warm tub bath for 1/2-2 hours during first stage labor after a strictly normal pregnancy, ending with spontaneous onset of labor at term. A control group consisted of 72 women fulfilling the same criteria of normality during pregnancy and labor, but who did not want to take a warm tub bath during labor. Apart from the bath, the two groups followed the usual obstetric procedures of the Department. The cervical dilatation in the "bath group" was 2 1/2 cm/h compared with 1 1/4 cm/h in the "control group". Mean pain score in the bath group was higher at the start of the study, before the bath, and they experienced a pain relief during bath which was not observed in the control group. This difference may be due to bias. The use of morfica and the need for stimulation of labor contractions were both twice as high in the control group, but this difference was not significant. No differences were observed with regard to operative delivery, vaginal or perineal laceration or in bleeding during labor or postpartum. The total duration of labor was the same in the two groups and no differences in neonatal condition were observed. The bacterial contamination of the bath water was insignificant and there were no significant febrile episodes post partum.
在一项前瞻性研究中,88名女性在正常妊娠后第一产程中在温水中盆浴1/2 - 2小时,足月时自然发动分娩。对照组由72名在妊娠和分娩期间符合相同正常标准但在分娩时不想进行温水盆浴的女性组成。除了盆浴外,两组均遵循该科室的常规产科程序。“盆浴组”的宫颈扩张速度为每小时2.5厘米,而“对照组”为每小时1.25厘米。在研究开始时、盆浴前,盆浴组的平均疼痛评分较高,且她们在盆浴期间经历了疼痛缓解,而对照组未观察到这种情况。这种差异可能是由于偏差。对照组中使用吗啡和需要刺激宫缩的情况都是盆浴组的两倍,但这种差异并不显著。在手术分娩、阴道或会阴撕裂或分娩期间或产后出血方面未观察到差异。两组的总产程相同,新生儿状况也未观察到差异。浴水的细菌污染不显著,产后也没有明显的发热发作。