Suppr超能文献

有和没有轻度智力障碍的儿童及青少年的持续时间判断

Duration judgments in children and adolescents with and without mild intellectual disability.

作者信息

Rattat Anne-Claire, Collié Isabelle

机构信息

Sciences of Cognition, Technology and Ergonomics (SCoTE) Laboratory, Champollion National University Institute, Toulouse University, Albi, France.

Medico-Educational Institute - Autan Val Fleuri, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2020 Nov 18;6(11):e05514. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05514. eCollection 2020 Nov.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While the ability to measure time correctly is crucial for adaptation to the external physical and social environment, to date, research on timing ability and its development in individuals with intellectual disability (ID) is unfortunately remarkably scarce.

AIMS

In the present study, we investigated the ability of individuals with mild ID to estimate durations and the development of this ability from 11 to 19 years, in comparison to typically developing (TD) individuals.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Participants with mild ID and TD participants matched on chronological age completed two temporal tasks: (1) a temporal bisection of auditory stimuli, in which they had to decide whether arbitrary stimulus duration was more similar to the short (200 ms) or the long (800 ms) standard previously learned, and (2) a temporal categorization of familiar actions, in which short, medium or long target durations had to be paired with one of three comparison action durations.

OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

Temporal performance was systematically impaired in participants with mild ID. Moreover, the temporal impairment increased with age in the bisection task but not in the categorization task.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

These findings suggest that the ability to estimate durations develops at a slower pace in individuals with mild ID compared to TD individuals.

摘要

背景

虽然正确测量时间的能力对于适应外部自然和社会环境至关重要,但遗憾的是,迄今为止,关于智力残疾(ID)个体的计时能力及其发展的研究非常稀少。

目的

在本研究中,我们调查了轻度ID个体估计持续时间的能力以及该能力在11至19岁之间的发展情况,并与正常发育(TD)个体进行了比较。

方法和程序

年龄匹配的轻度ID参与者和TD参与者完成了两项时间任务:(1)听觉刺激的时间二等分,他们必须判断任意刺激持续时间与之前学习的短(200毫秒)或长(800毫秒)标准哪个更相似;(2)熟悉动作的时间分类,其中短、中或长目标持续时间必须与三个比较动作持续时间之一配对。

结果

轻度ID参与者的时间表现系统性受损。此外,在二等分任务中,时间损伤随年龄增加,但在分类任务中并非如此。

结论和启示

这些发现表明,与TD个体相比,轻度ID个体估计持续时间的能力发展较慢。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf29/7683311/d9c363c7ea44/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验