NEK Associates LTD, Allston, MA, 02134, USA.
Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Risk Anal. 2021 Apr;41(4):571-583. doi: 10.1111/risa.13647. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
Managing public health risks from environmental contaminants has historically relied on a risk assessment process defined by the regulatory context in which these risks are assessed. Risk assessment guidance follows a straightforward, chemical-by-chemical approach to inform regulatory decisions around the question "what is the risk-based concentration protective of human and ecological health outcomes?" Here we briefly summarize regulatory risk assessment in the context of innovative risk assessment approaches based on an evolving understanding of the underlying scientific disciplines that support risk analysis more broadly. We discuss scientific versus regulatory tensions in the application of these approaches for future risk assessments, and challenges in translating our improved understanding of the underlying scientific complexity to the regulatory landscape to better inform decision making that extends beyond conventional regulatory mandates.
管理环境污染物对公共健康的风险在历史上一直依赖于风险评估过程,该过程由评估这些风险的监管环境定义。风险评估指南遵循一种简单直接的、逐个化学物质的方法,旨在为监管决策提供信息,解决“基于风险的浓度对保护人类和生态健康结果有何作用?”这一问题。在这里,我们简要总结了在基于对更广泛风险分析所支持的基础科学学科不断发展的理解的创新风险评估方法的背景下的监管风险评估。我们讨论了在将这些方法应用于未来风险评估时,科学与监管之间的紧张关系,以及将我们对基础科学复杂性的理解转化为监管领域的挑战,以便更好地为超出传统监管要求的决策提供信息。