Wei Fei-Long, Liu Ya, Zhou Cheng-Pei, Sun Si-Guo, Zhu Kai-Long, Du Ming-Rui, Gao Hao-Ran, Yuan Yi-Fang, Song Yang, Qian Shu, An Bo, Wang Huan, Li Xiao-Xiang, Guo Shi-Kong, Gao Quan-You, Wu Sheng-Da, Yan Xiao-Dong, Sun Li-Li, Qian Ji-Xian
Department of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, 56697Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Department of Outpatient, Xijing Hospital, 56697Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020 Sep-Dec;28(3):2309499020975212. doi: 10.1177/2309499020975212.
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is caused by structural changes of the spine, which lead to several severe symptoms, including back pain, leg pain, numbness and tingling in the legs, as well as reduced physical function. However, there is little evidence suggesting whether a patient with LSS should be treated with surgery. If surgery is recommended, which type of surgery benefits the patient most? To answer these questions, we will conduct a network meta-analysis and a systematic review to compare surgical and nonsurgical interventions in terms of efficacy as well as safety in adult patients with LSS.
We will search the PubMed, Cochrane library, and EMBASE databases for articles published prior to October 10, 2019. We will search for randomized controlled trials assessing surgical and nonsurgical interventions for adult patients with degenerative LSS without any language restrictions. The primary outcome measures will be pain and disability. The secondary outcomes will include adverse events (number of events or number of people with each type of adverse event), reoperations, complications, blood loss and operation time. We will obtain the full texts of the potentially relevant studies and independently assess them. The quality of evidence will be evaluated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. A random-effects network meta-analysis will be performed to analyze all the evidence under the frequentist framework, and the ranking results will be presented. We will generate plots depicting the network geometry using Stata. The network meta-analysis will be performed according to the Bayesian framework. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required. The research will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)由脊柱结构改变引起,会导致多种严重症状,包括背痛、腿痛、腿部麻木和刺痛,以及身体功能下降。然而,几乎没有证据表明LSS患者是否应接受手术治疗。如果建议进行手术,哪种手术对患者最有益?为回答这些问题,我们将进行一项网状Meta分析和系统评价,以比较手术和非手术干预措施在成年LSS患者中的疗效和安全性。
我们将检索PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和EMBASE数据库,查找2019年10月10日前发表的文章。我们将检索评估成年退行性LSS患者手术和非手术干预措施的随机对照试验,无语言限制。主要结局指标将是疼痛和残疾。次要结局将包括不良事件(事件数量或每种不良事件的人数)、再次手术、并发症、失血量和手术时间。我们将获取潜在相关研究的全文并独立评估。证据质量将根据推荐评估、制定和评价分级框架进行评估。将进行随机效应网状Meta分析,在频率学派框架下分析所有证据,并呈现排名结果。我们将使用Stata生成描绘网络几何形状的图表。网状Meta分析将根据贝叶斯框架进行。伦理与传播 无需伦理批准。本研究将发表在同行评审期刊上。