Gao Quan-You, Wei Fei-Long, Li Tian, Zhu Kai-Long, Du Ming-Rui, Heng Wei, Yang Fan, Gao Hao-Ran, Qian Ji-Xian, Zhou Cheng-Pei
Department of Orthopedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
School of Basic Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 19;9:829426. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.829426. eCollection 2022.
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is an effective surgical option for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with spondylolisthesis. However, few studies have discussed oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) with MIS-TLIF.
To evaluate postoperative improvements, complications, and reoperation rates between patients with LSS undergoing OLIF or MIS-TLIF.
We retrospectively studied 113 LLS patients who underwent OLIF (53) or MIS-TLIF (60) with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation between January 2016 and December 2018. We measured estimated blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, reoperation, and complication incidence, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores, discal and foraminal height and lumbar lordotic angle.
The mean age was 58.81 ± 0.9 years. The TLIF group had increased operation time, blood loss, and hospital stays ( = 0.007, 0.001, and 0.016, respectively). Postoperatively, VAS and ODI scores significantly decreased while JOA and SF-36 scores significantly increased. The postoperative differences in main outcomes between the groups were insignificant (all > 0.05). The OLIF group had the lowest rates of overall (9.8% OLIF vs. 12.9% MIS-TLIF), intraoperative (3.9% OLIF vs. 4.8% MIS-TLIF), and postoperative complications (5.9% OLIF vs. 8.1% MIS-TLIF), but the differences were insignificant ( = 0.607, 0.813, and 0.653, respectively). The reoperation rate did not differ significantly (3.8% OLIF vs. 3.3% MIS-TLIF) ( = 0.842). OLIF restored disc height (74.4 vs. 32.0%), foraminal height (27.4 vs. 18.2%), and lumbar lordotic angle (3.5 vs. 1.1%) with greater success than did MIS-TLIF.
Patients undergoing OLIF with LSS improved similarly to MIS-TLIF patients. OLIF restored disc height, foraminal height and lumbar lordotic angle more successfully than did MIS-TLIF.
微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)是治疗腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)伴椎体滑脱的一种有效手术方式。然而,很少有研究探讨斜外侧椎间融合术(OLIF)联合MIS-TLIF。
评估接受OLIF或MIS-TLIF的LSS患者术后的改善情况、并发症及再次手术率。
我们回顾性研究了2016年1月至2018年12月期间接受OLIF(53例)或MIS-TLIF(60例)并采用经皮椎弓根螺钉固定的113例LSS患者。我们测量了估计失血量、手术时间、住院时间、再次手术情况及并发症发生率、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分和简明健康状况调查量表(SF-36)评分、椎间盘及椎间孔高度和腰椎前凸角。
平均年龄为58.81±0.9岁。TLIF组的手术时间、失血量和住院时间增加(分别为P = 0.007、0.001和0.016)。术后,VAS和ODI评分显著降低,而JOA和SF-36评分显著升高。两组间主要结局指标的术后差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。OLIF组的总体并发症发生率(OLIF组为9.8%,MIS-TLIF组为12.9%)、术中并发症发生率(OLIF组为3.9%,MIS-TLIF组为4.8%)和术后并发症发生率(OLIF组为5.9%,MIS-TLIF组为8.1%)最低,但差异无统计学意义(分别为P = 0.607、0.813和0.653)。再次手术率差异无统计学意义(OLIF组为3.8%,MIS-TLIF组为3.3%)(P = 0.842)。与MIS-TLIF相比,OLIF在恢复椎间盘高度(74.4%对32.0%)、椎间孔高度(27.4%对18.2%)和腰椎前凸角(3.5°对1.1°)方面更成功。
接受OLIF治疗的LSS患者与接受MIS-TLIF治疗的患者改善情况相似。与MIS-TLIF相比,OLIF在恢复椎间盘高度、椎间孔高度和腰椎前凸角方面更成功。