AlMasoud Najla, Muhamadali Howbeer, Chisanga Malama, AlRabiah Haitham, Lima Cassio A, Goodacre Royston
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Analyst. 2021 Feb 7;146(3):770-788. doi: 10.1039/d0an01482f. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
Rapid and accurate classification and discrimination of bacteria is an important task and has been highlighted recently for rapid diagnostics using real-time results. Coupled with a recent report by Jim O'Neill [] that if left unaddressed antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in bacteria could kill 10 million people per year by 2050, which would surpass current cancer mortality, this further highlights the need for unequivocal identification of microorganisms. Whilst traditional microbiological testing has offered insights into the characterisation and identification of a wide range of bacteria, these approaches have proven to be laborious and time-consuming and are not really fit for purpose, considering the modern day speed and volume of international travel and the opportunities it creates for the spread of pathogens globally. To overcome these disadvantages, modern analytical methods, such as mass spectrometry (MS) and vibrational spectroscopy, that analyse the whole organism, have emerged as essential alternative approaches. Currently within clinical microbiology laboratories, matrix assisted laser desorption ionisation (MALDI)-MS is the method of choice for bacterial identification. This is largely down to its robust analysis as it largely measures the ribosomes which are always present irrespective of how the bacteria are cultured. However, MALDI-MS requires large amounts of biomass and infrared spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy are attractive alternatives as these physicochemical bioanalytical techniques have the advantages of being rapid, reliable and cost-effective for analysing various types of bacterial samples, even at the single cell level. In this review, we discuss the fundamental applications, advantages and disadvantages of modern analytical techniques used for bacterial characterisation, classification and identification.
细菌的快速准确分类和鉴别是一项重要任务,并且最近在利用实时结果进行快速诊断方面受到了关注。吉姆·奥尼尔最近的一份报告指出,如果细菌的抗微生物耐药性(AMR)问题得不到解决,到2050年每年可能导致1000万人死亡,这将超过目前癌症的死亡率,这进一步凸显了明确鉴定微生物的必要性。虽然传统微生物检测为多种细菌的特征描述和鉴定提供了见解,但考虑到现代国际旅行的速度和规模以及它为病原体在全球传播创造的机会,这些方法已被证明既费力又耗时,并不真正适合实际需求。为克服这些缺点,现代分析方法,如分析整个生物体的质谱(MS)和振动光谱,已成为重要的替代方法。目前在临床微生物实验室中,基质辅助激光解吸电离(MALDI)-MS是细菌鉴定的首选方法。这主要归功于其强大的分析能力,因为它主要测量核糖体,而核糖体无论细菌如何培养都会存在。然而,MALDI-MS需要大量生物量,而红外光谱和拉曼光谱是有吸引力的替代方法,因为这些物理化学生物分析技术具有快速、可靠且经济高效的优点,可用于分析各种类型的细菌样本,甚至在单细胞水平。在本综述中,我们讨论了用于细菌特征描述、分类和鉴定的现代分析技术的基本应用、优点和缺点。