• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特质共情和亲社会期望对观察到的动作加工的影响。

Effects of trait empathy and expectation on the processing of observed actions.

机构信息

Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Feb;21(1):156-171. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00857-7. Epub 2020 Dec 9.

DOI:10.3758/s13415-020-00857-7
PMID:33296041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7994233/
Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that the processing of observed actions may reflect an action prediction error, with more pronounced mediofrontal negative event-related potentials (ERPs) for unexpected actions. This evidence comes from an application of a false-belief task, where unexpected correct responses elicited high ERP amplitudes. An alternative interpretation is that the ERP component reflects vicarious error processing, as objectively correct responses were errors from the observed person's perspective. In this study, we aimed to disentangle the two possibilities by adding the factor task difficulty, which varied expectations without affecting the definition of (vicarious) errors, and to explore the role of empathy in action observation. We found that the relationship between empathy and event-related potentials (ERPs) mirrored the relationship between empathy and behavioral expectancy measures. Only in the easy task condition did higher empathy lead to stronger expectancy of correct responses in the true-belief and of errors in the false-belief condition. A compatible pattern was found for an early ERP component (150-200 ms) after the observed response, with a larger negativity for error than correct responses in the true-belief and the reverse pattern in the false-belief condition, but only in highly empathic participants. We conclude that empathy facilitates the formation of expectations regarding the actions of others. These expectations then modulate the processing of observed actions, as indicated by the ERPs in the present study.

摘要

最近的证据表明,观察到的动作的加工可能反映了动作预测错误,对于意外的动作,中前额负事件相关电位(ERP)更为明显。这一证据来自于错误信念任务的应用,其中意外的正确反应引起了高的 ERP 幅度。另一种解释是,ERP 成分反映了替代性错误加工,因为从观察到的人的角度来看,客观上正确的反应是错误的。在这项研究中,我们旨在通过添加任务难度因素来区分这两种可能性,该因素不影响(替代性)错误的定义,但会改变预期,从而探索同理心在动作观察中的作用。我们发现,同理心与事件相关电位(ERP)之间的关系反映了同理心与行为预期测量之间的关系。只有在简单任务条件下,更高的同理心才会导致对真实信念中正确反应的更高期望,以及对错误信念中错误反应的更高期望。在观察到反应后的 150-200 毫秒,出现了一个早期的 ERP 成分,与真实信念中的错误反应相比,该成分的负性更强,而在错误信念条件下则出现相反的模式,但只有在高度同理心的参与者中才会出现这种模式。我们得出结论,同理心有助于形成对他人动作的期望。这些期望然后调节了所观察到的动作的处理,这在本研究中的 ERP 中得到了体现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f2/7994233/e76ccc7f7d6c/13415_2020_857_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f2/7994233/9ff57bfa08a0/13415_2020_857_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f2/7994233/54f3dfd176f4/13415_2020_857_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f2/7994233/eba6b1e0cb23/13415_2020_857_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f2/7994233/a99c35ffdc59/13415_2020_857_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f2/7994233/f754701e2ee0/13415_2020_857_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f2/7994233/68caaa0f4934/13415_2020_857_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f2/7994233/0f7d230bb0a2/13415_2020_857_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f2/7994233/e76ccc7f7d6c/13415_2020_857_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f2/7994233/9ff57bfa08a0/13415_2020_857_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f2/7994233/54f3dfd176f4/13415_2020_857_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f2/7994233/eba6b1e0cb23/13415_2020_857_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f2/7994233/a99c35ffdc59/13415_2020_857_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f2/7994233/f754701e2ee0/13415_2020_857_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f2/7994233/68caaa0f4934/13415_2020_857_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f2/7994233/0f7d230bb0a2/13415_2020_857_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33f2/7994233/e76ccc7f7d6c/13415_2020_857_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of trait empathy and expectation on the processing of observed actions.特质共情和亲社会期望对观察到的动作加工的影响。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Feb;21(1):156-171. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00857-7. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
2
The role of trait empathy in the processing of observed actions in a false-belief task.特质同理心在错误信念任务中观察到的动作处理中的作用。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):53-61. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa009.
3
Disentangling effects of expectancy, accuracy, and empathy on the processing of observed actions.解析期望、准确性和同理心对观察到的动作处理的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2021 Sep;58(9):e13883. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13883. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
4
Mediofrontal event-related potentials following observed actions reflect an action prediction error.观察到的动作引发的中额额事件相关电位反映了动作预测错误。
Eur J Neurosci. 2013 May;37(9):1435-40. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12138. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
5
The effect of empathy and context on face-processing ERPs.共情和语境对面部加工 ERP 的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Oct;147:107612. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107612. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
6
Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response.反应兼容性以及事件相关电位与运动反应时间之间的关系。
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;76(6):3705-13. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.3705.
7
Your losses are mine: The influence of empathic concern on evaluative processing of others' outcomes.你的损失也是我的损失:共情关心对他人结果评价处理的影响。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Jun;20(3):481-492. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00779-4.
8
The influence of trait empathy on reactive aggression: An ERP study.特质同理心对反应性攻击的影响:一项 ERP 研究。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2018 Nov;133:102-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
9
Erroneous and correct actions have a different affective valence: evidence from ERPs.错误和正确的动作具有不同的情感效价:来自 ERP 的证据。
Emotion. 2013 Oct;13(5):960-73. doi: 10.1037/a0032808. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
10
Empathy and error processing.共情与错误处理。
Psychophysiology. 2010 May 1;47(3):415-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00949.x. Epub 2009 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Expectations for the Future Among Young Korean Adults.韩国年轻成年人对未来期望的预测因素。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 19;15(3):391. doi: 10.3390/bs15030391.
2
The impact of emotional feedback in learning easy and difficult tasks - an ERP study.情绪反馈对学习简单和困难任务的影响——一项事件相关电位研究
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01284-2.
3
Neuronal Correlates of Empathy: A Systematic Review of Event-Related Potentials Studies in Perceptual Tasks.共情的神经关联:对感知任务中事件相关电位研究的系统综述

本文引用的文献

1
Midline frontal and occipito-temporal activity during error monitoring in dyadic motor interactions.二元运动交互中错误监测期间的中线额叶和枕颞叶活动。
Cortex. 2020 Jun;127:131-149. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.01.020. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
2
Rapid adaptive adjustments of selective attention following errors revealed by the time course of steady-state visual evoked potentials.稳态视觉诱发电位时程揭示错误后选择性注意的快速自适应调整。
Neuroimage. 2019 Feb 1;186:83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.059. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
3
Error, rather than its probability, elicits specific electrocortical signatures: a combined EEG-immersive virtual reality study of action observation.
Brain Sci. 2024 May 16;14(5):504. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14050504.
4
Slip or fallacy? Effects of error severity on own and observed pitch error processing in pianists.失误还是谬误?错误严重程度对钢琴家自身和观察到的音高误差处理的影响。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Aug;23(4):1076-1094. doi: 10.3758/s13415-023-01097-1. Epub 2023 May 17.
错误而非其概率引发特定的皮质电信号:一项结合 EEG 和沉浸式虚拟现实的动作观察研究。
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Sep 1;120(3):1107-1118. doi: 10.1152/jn.00130.2018. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
4
Performance monitoring in the medial frontal cortex and related neural networks: From monitoring self actions to understanding others' actions.内侧前额叶皮质及相关神经网络中的行为监测:从监测自身行为到理解他人行为。
Neurosci Res. 2018 Dec;137:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
5
Action perception as hypothesis testing.将动作感知作为假设检验。
Cortex. 2017 Apr;89:45-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.01.016. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
6
Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R.在R语言中评估线性混合效应模型的显著性。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Aug;49(4):1494-1502. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0809-y.
7
Error significance but not error expectancy predicts error-related negativities for different error types.错误显著性而非错误预期能够预测不同错误类型的错误相关负波。
Behav Brain Res. 2016 Jan 15;297:259-67. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.10.031. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
8
Disentangling the impacts of outcome valence and outcome frequency on the post-error slowing.解析结果效价和结果频率对错误后反应减慢的影响。
Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 3;5:8708. doi: 10.1038/srep08708.
9
Brain systems underlying the affective and social monitoring of actions: an integrative review.大脑系统在行为的情感和社会监控中的作用:综合综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Oct;46 Pt 1:71-84. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.02.014. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
10
Neurophysiology of performance monitoring and adaptive behavior.表现监测和自适应行为的神经生理学。
Physiol Rev. 2014 Jan;94(1):35-79. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00041.2012.