• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞在上肢骨折固定中的应用:神经刺激、超声引导技术与两种技术联合应用的比较。

Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Fracture Fixation:A Comparison of Nerve Stimulation, Ultrasound-Guided Technique and a Combination of both Techniques.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria.

出版信息

West Afr J Med. 2020 Dec;37(7):757-762.

PMID:33296484
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nerve stimulation and ultrasound-guided techniques for supraclavicular block have been widely studied but information on the effectiveness of the combination of both techniques is limited.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This study compared the success rate and block characteristics of 3 techniques for supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized control trial.

SETTING

In a tertiary teaching hospital in which patients scheduled for upper limb surgeries were recruited.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-six eligible patients were randomized into nerve stimulation, ultrasound-guided technique and their combination groups. Each received 40 ml of equal volumes of 0.5% plain bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline. The primary outcome was the success rate of block and secondary outcomes included block characteristics. Data were subjected to statistical analysis (2-tailed tests), p-value < 0.05 significant.

RESULTS

Seventy subjects were recruited, 66 completed the study. The success rates include: Ultrasound-guided technique + Nerve Stimulator (100%), Ultrasound-guided technique (90.9) and Nerve stimulator (81.8%). The onset of motor block was faster in the ultrasound guided technique (p = 0.043). The quality of sensory block and full motor block was superior in the combination group at 10th and 15th minute respectively. There were no complications and patient satisfaction with care was comparable in the groups.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that combining ultrasound-guided technique and nerve stimulator resulted in the highest success rate, better sensory and motor block within 15minutes at C8 dermatome. Thus, hand surgeries can commence early, minimizing waiting time.

摘要

背景

锁骨上神经刺激和超声引导技术已广泛研究,但有关两种技术联合应用效果的信息有限。

目的和目标

本研究比较了 3 种锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞技术的成功率和阻滞特点。

设计

前瞻性随机对照试验。

设置

在一家三级教学医院中,招募了计划接受上肢手术的患者。

材料和方法

66 名符合条件的患者随机分为神经刺激组、超声引导技术组和联合组。每组均接受 40ml 等容量的 0.5%布比卡因和 2%利多卡因,加 1:200,000 肾上腺素。主要结局是阻滞成功率,次要结局包括阻滞特点。数据进行了统计学分析(双侧检验,p 值<0.05 为显著)。

结果

共招募了 70 名患者,其中 66 名完成了研究。成功率包括:超声引导技术+神经刺激器(100%)、超声引导技术(90.9%)和神经刺激器(81.8%)。超声引导技术的运动阻滞起效更快(p=0.043)。在第 10 分钟和第 15 分钟时,联合组的感觉阻滞和完全运动阻滞质量更好。各组均无并发症,患者对护理的满意度相当。

结论

本研究表明,超声引导技术与神经刺激器联合应用可提高成功率,在 C8 皮区 15 分钟内获得更好的感觉和运动阻滞。因此,可以尽早开始手部手术,减少等待时间。

相似文献

1
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Fracture Fixation:A Comparison of Nerve Stimulation, Ultrasound-Guided Technique and a Combination of both Techniques.锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞在上肢骨折固定中的应用:神经刺激、超声引导技术与两种技术联合应用的比较。
West Afr J Med. 2020 Dec;37(7):757-762.
2
Double-injection technique assisted by a nerve stimulator for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block results in better distal sensory-motor block: A randomised controlled trial.神经刺激器引导锁骨上臂丛阻滞的双注射技术可实现更好的远侧感觉-运动阻滞:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Mar;34(3):127-134. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000542.
3
Comparison of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular, infraclavicular and below-C6 interscalene brachial plexus block for upper limb surgery: a randomised, observer-blinded study.超声引导下锁骨上、锁骨下及 C6 以下肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞用于上肢手术的比较:一项随机、观察者盲法研究。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 Jul;43(4):468-72. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1504300408.
4
Retroclavicular vs supraclavicular brachial plexus block for distal upper limb surgery: a randomised, controlled, single-blinded trial.锁骨下入路与锁骨上入路臂丛神经阻滞用于上肢远端手术:一项随机、对照、单盲试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;122(4):518-524. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.12.022. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
5
Anaesthetic Effects of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine on Onset, Duration of Block and Changes in Hemodynamic Parameters in Patients Undergoing Below Elbow Surgeries Under Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block.罗哌卡因和布比卡因对超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞下行肘部以下手术患者的麻醉起效时间、阻滞持续时间及血流动力学参数变化的影响
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2023 Dec 13;21(2):284-290. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v21i02.4653.
6
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular vs infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks in children.超声引导下儿童锁骨上与锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞
Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Sep;18(9):838-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02644.x. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
7
Comparison of ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper extremity surgery: a propensity score matched retrospective cohort study.超声引导锁骨下入路与锁骨上入路臂丛神经阻滞用于上肢手术的比较:倾向评分匹配回顾性队列研究。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Jan;10(1):454-461. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-2376. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
8
Randomized Comparison of Extrafascial Versus Subfascial Injection of Local Anesthetic During Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block.超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞时筋膜外与筋膜下注射局部麻醉药的随机对照研究
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):337-43. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000264.
9
Comparison of Ultrasound with Peripheral Nerve Stimulator-guided Technique for Supraclavicular Block in Upper Limb Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.上肢手术中超声与外周神经刺激器引导技术用于锁骨上阻滞的比较:一项随机对照试验
Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):50-54. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_211_17.
10
[The use of neurostimulation with ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block: Does it increase success?].[超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞联合神经刺激的应用:是否能提高成功率?]
Agri. 2019 Apr;31(2):79-85. doi: 10.5505/agri.2018.44827.

引用本文的文献

1
Intelligent Algorithm-Based Ultrasound for Evaluating the Anesthesia and Nursing Intervention for Elderly Patients with Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures.基于智能算法的超声评估用于老年股骨转子间骨折患者的麻醉和护理干预。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 May 24;2022:3557994. doi: 10.1155/2022/3557994. eCollection 2022.