• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of Ultrasound with Peripheral Nerve Stimulator-guided Technique for Supraclavicular Block in Upper Limb Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.上肢手术中超声与外周神经刺激器引导技术用于锁骨上阻滞的比较:一项随机对照试验
Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):50-54. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_211_17.
2
A randomised comparative evaluation of supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches to brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries using both ultrasound and nerve stimulator.使用超声和神经刺激器对锁骨上和锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞用于上肢手术的随机对照评估。
Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Jul;61(7):581-586. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_402_16.
3
A comparative study of nerve stimulator versus ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block.神经刺激器与超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞的比较研究
Anesth Essays Res. 2013 Sep-Dec;7(3):359-64. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.123235.
4
Comparison between Conventional and Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Upper Limb Surgeries.上肢手术中传统锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞与超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞的比较。
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Apr-Jun;11(2):467-471. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_43_17.
5
Anaesthetic Effects of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine on Onset, Duration of Block and Changes in Hemodynamic Parameters in Patients Undergoing Below Elbow Surgeries Under Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block.罗哌卡因和布比卡因对超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞下行肘部以下手术患者的麻醉起效时间、阻滞持续时间及血流动力学参数变化的影响
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2023 Dec 13;21(2):284-290. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v21i02.4653.
6
The Comparison of Two Different Volumes of 0.5% Ropivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Onset and Duration of Analgesia for Upper Limb Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study.两种不同容量0.5%罗哌卡因在超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞用于上肢手术镇痛的起效时间和持续时间比较:一项随机对照研究
Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Jan-Mar;14(1):87-91. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_4_20. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
7
A Comparison Between Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular and Infraclavicular Approaches to Brachial Plexus Block for Elective Upper Limb Surgery.超声引导下锁骨上与锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞用于择期上肢手术的比较
Cureus. 2023 Oct 7;15(10):e46656. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46656. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Upper Limb Fracture Fixation:A Comparison of Nerve Stimulation, Ultrasound-Guided Technique and a Combination of both Techniques.锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞在上肢骨折固定中的应用:神经刺激、超声引导技术与两种技术联合应用的比较。
West Afr J Med. 2020 Dec;37(7):757-762.
9
Double-injection technique assisted by a nerve stimulator for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block results in better distal sensory-motor block: A randomised controlled trial.神经刺激器引导锁骨上臂丛阻滞的双注射技术可实现更好的远侧感觉-运动阻滞:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Mar;34(3):127-134. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000542.
10
Efficacy of dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries.右美托咪定联合罗哌卡因用于上肢手术锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞的疗效
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jan-Mar;33(1):81-85. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.202196.

引用本文的文献

1
Practices and diversities in plexus and peripheral nerve blocks: A survey.丛神经和周围神经阻滞的实践与差异:一项调查。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Apr-Jun;41(2):270-279. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_97_24. Epub 2025 Feb 22.
2
Effect of Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine for Ultrasound-guided Axillary Plexus Block: A Randomized, Double-blinded Prospective Study.地塞米松作为布比卡因辅助剂用于超声引导下腋路臂丛神经阻滞的效果:一项随机、双盲前瞻性研究。
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2025;13(3):138-145. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.72778.3389.
3
A prospective, randomised, single-blinded controlled trial comparing ultrasound versus nerve stimulator guidance for interscalene block for ambulatory upper limb surgeries.一项前瞻性、随机、单盲对照试验,比较超声与神经刺激器引导用于门诊上肢手术的肌间沟阻滞。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2023 Jul-Aug;79(4):399-408. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
4
Investigation of infraclavicular block success using the perfusion index: A randomized clinical trial.应用灌注指数评估锁骨下阻滞成功率的随机临床试验。
Biomol Biomed. 2023 May 1;23(3):496-501. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2022.8214.
5
Supraclavicular vs. Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Nerve Blocks: Clinical, Pharmacological, and Anatomical Considerations.锁骨上与锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞:临床、药理学及解剖学考量
Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Oct 31;11(5):e120658. doi: 10.5812/aapm.120658. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Effects of esketamine combined with ultrasound-guided nerve block on cognitive function in children with lower extremity fractures.艾司氯胺酮联合超声引导下神经阻滞对下肢骨折患儿认知功能的影响。
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Jul 15;13(7):7976-7982. eCollection 2021.
7
Impact of Regional Block Failure in Ambulatory Hand Surgery on Patient Management: A Cohort Study.门诊手部手术中区域阻滞失败对患者管理的影响:一项队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 31;9(8):2453. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082453.

本文引用的文献

1
An evaluation of brachial plexus block using a nerve stimulator versus ultrasound guidance: A randomized controlled trial.使用神经刺激器与超声引导进行臂丛神经阻滞的评估:一项随机对照试验。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jul-Sep;31(3):370-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.161675.
2
A comparative study of nerve stimulator versus ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block.神经刺激器与超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞的比较研究
Anesth Essays Res. 2013 Sep-Dec;7(3):359-64. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.123235.
3
Ultrasound guidance for brachial plexus block decreases the incidence of complete hemi-diaphragmatic paresis or vascular punctures and improves success rate of brachial plexus nerve block compared with peripheral nerve stimulator in adults.超声引导用于臂丛神经阻滞可降低成人完全膈肌麻痹或血管穿刺的发生率,并提高臂丛神经阻滞的成功率,优于外周神经刺激器。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 May;125(10):1811-6.
4
Comparison of a supraclavicular block showing upper arm twitching response with a supraclavicular block showing wrist or finger twitching response.比较锁骨上阻滞引起上臂搐搦反应与锁骨上阻滞引起腕部或手指搐搦反应。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010 May;58(5):464-7. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2010.58.5.464. Epub 2010 May 29.
5
Ultrasound guidance speeds execution and improves the quality of supraclavicular block.超声引导可加快锁骨上阻滞的实施并提高其质量。
Anesth Analg. 2003 Nov;97(5):1518-1523. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000086730.09173.CA.
6
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block.超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞
Anesth Analg. 2003 Nov;97(5):1514-1517. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000062519.61520.14.
7
Needle nerve stimulatorlocator: nerve blocks with a new instrument for locating nerves.针式神经刺激器定位仪:使用一种新型神经定位仪器进行神经阻滞。
Anesth Analg. 1962 Sep-Oct;41:599-602.
8
Nerve stimulator and multiple injection technique for upper and lower limb blockade: failure rate, patient acceptance, and neurologic complications. Study Group on Regional Anesthesia.用于上肢和下肢阻滞的神经刺激器与多次注射技术:失败率、患者接受度及神经并发症。区域麻醉研究组
Anesth Analg. 1999 Apr;88(4):847-52. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199904000-00031.
9
Supraclavicular nerve block: anatomic analysis of a method to prevent pneumothorax.锁骨上神经阻滞:一种预防气胸方法的解剖学分析
Anesth Analg. 1993 Mar;76(3):530-4. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199303000-00013.
10
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular approach for regional anesthesia of the brachial plexus.超声引导下锁骨上入路臂丛神经区域麻醉
Anesth Analg. 1994 Mar;78(3):507-13. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199403000-00016.

上肢手术中超声与外周神经刺激器引导技术用于锁骨上阻滞的比较:一项随机对照试验

Comparison of Ultrasound with Peripheral Nerve Stimulator-guided Technique for Supraclavicular Block in Upper Limb Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Alfred Vinu Mervick, Srinivasan Gnanasekaran, Zachariah Mamie

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, India.

出版信息

Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):50-54. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_211_17.

DOI:10.4103/aer.AER_211_17
PMID:29628554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5872893/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The supraclavicular approach is considered to be the easiest and most effective approach to block the brachial plexus for upper limb surgeries. The classical approach using the anatomical landmark technique was associated with higher failure rates and complications. Ultrasonography (USG) guidance and peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS) have improved the success rates and safety margin.

AIMS

The aim of the present study is to compare USG with PNS in supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries with respect to the onset of motor and sensory blockade, total duration of blockade, procedure time, and complications.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

Prospective, randomized controlled study.

SUBJECT AND METHODS

Sixty patients aged above 18 years scheduled for elective upper limb surgery were randomly allocated into two groups. Group A patients received supraclavicular brachial plexus block under ultrasound guidance and in Group B patients, PNS was used. In both groups, local anesthetic mixture consisting of 15 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 10 ml of 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline were used.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Independent -test used to compare mean between groups; Chi-square test for categorical variables.

RESULTS

The procedure time was shorter with USG (11.57 ± 2.75 min) compared to PNS (21.73 ± 4.84). The onset time of sensory block (12.83 ± 3.64 min vs. 16 ± 3.57 min) and onset of motor block (23 ± 4.27 min vs. 27 ± 3.85 min) were significantly shorter in Group A compared to Group B ( < 0.05). The duration of sensory block was significantly prolonged in Group A (8.00 ± 0.891 h) compared to Group B (7.25 ± 1.418 h). None of the patients in either groups developed any complications.

CONCLUSION

The ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block can be done quicker, with a faster onset of sensory and motor block compared to nerve stimulator technique.

摘要

背景

锁骨上入路被认为是上肢手术中阻滞臂丛神经最简单、最有效的方法。使用解剖标志技术的传统方法失败率和并发症较高。超声(USG)引导和外周神经刺激器(PNS)提高了成功率和安全系数。

目的

本研究的目的是比较在锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞用于上肢手术时,超声引导与外周神经刺激器在运动和感觉阻滞起效时间、总阻滞时间、操作时间及并发症方面的差异。

设置与设计

前瞻性、随机对照研究。

对象与方法

60例年龄18岁以上择期行上肢手术的患者被随机分为两组。A组患者在超声引导下行锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞,B组患者使用外周神经刺激器。两组均使用由15 ml 0.5%布比卡因、10 ml 2%利多卡因和1:200,000肾上腺素组成的局部麻醉混合液。

统计学分析

采用独立样本t检验比较组间均值;分类变量采用卡方检验。

结果

与外周神经刺激器组(21.73±4.84分钟)相比,超声引导组的操作时间更短(11.57±2.75分钟)。A组的感觉阻滞起效时间(12.83±3.64分钟对16±3.57分钟)和运动阻滞起效时间(23±4.27分钟对27±3.85分钟)明显短于B组(P<0.05)。与B组(7.25±1.418小时)相比,A组的感觉阻滞持续时间明显延长(8.00±0.891小时)。两组患者均未出现任何并发症。

结论

与神经刺激器技术相比,超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞操作更快,感觉和运动阻滞起效更快。