Suppr超能文献

非选择性与选择性希氏束起搏:一项急性患者内斑点追踪应变超声心动图研究。

Nonselective versus selective His bundle pacing: An acute intrapatient speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic study.

机构信息

First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology, and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.

Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, 3rd Medical Faculty of Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Jan;32(1):117-125. doi: 10.1111/jce.14834. Epub 2020 Dec 18.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to compare the acute differences in left ventricular (LV) function and mechanical synchrony during nonselective His bundle pacing (ns-HBP) versus selective His bundle pacing (s-HBP) using strain echocardiography.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients with permanent His bundle pacing, in whom it was possible to obtain both s-HBP and ns-HBP, were studied in two centers. In each patient, echocardiography was performed sequentially during s-HBP and ns-HBP. Speckle-tracking echocardiography parameters were analyzed: Global longitudinal strain (GLS), the time delay between peak systolic strain in the basal septal and basal lateral segments (BS-BL delay), peak strain dispersion (PSD) and strain delay index. Right ventricle function was assessed using tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and tissue Doppler velocity of the lateral tricuspid annulus (S'). A total of 69 patients (age: 75.6 ± 10.5 years; males: 75%) were enrolled. There were no differences in LV ejection fraction and GLS between s-HBP and ns-HBP modes: 59% versus 60%, and -15.6% versus -15.7%, respectively; as well as no difference in BS-BL delay and strain delay index. The PSD value was higher in the ns-HBP group than in the s-HBP group with the most pronounced difference in the basal LV segments. No differences in right ventricular function parameters (TAPSE and S') were found.

CONCLUSION

The ns-HBP and s-HBP modes seem comparable regarding ventricular function. The dyssynchrony parameters were significantly higher during ns-HBP, however, the difference seems modest and clarification of its impact on LV function requires a larger long-term study.

摘要

简介

我们旨在使用应变超声心动图比较非选择性希氏束起搏(ns-HBP)与选择性希氏束起搏(s-HBP)时左心室(LV)功能和机械同步性的急性差异。

方法和结果

在两个中心研究了连续接受永久性希氏束起搏的患者,这些患者可以同时获得 s-HBP 和 ns-HBP。在每个患者中,在 s-HBP 和 ns-HBP 期间连续进行超声心动图检查。分析斑点追踪超声心动图参数:整体纵向应变(GLS)、基底间隔和基底外侧节段收缩期峰值应变之间的时间延迟(BS-BL 延迟)、应变离散度(PSD)和应变延迟指数。使用三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移(TAPSE)和外侧三尖瓣环组织多普勒速度(S')评估右心室功能。共纳入 69 例患者(年龄:75.6±10.5 岁;男性:75%)。s-HBP 和 ns-HBP 模式之间的 LV 射血分数和 GLS 无差异:分别为 59%和 60%,-15.6%和-15.7%;BS-BL 延迟和应变延迟指数也无差异。PSD 值在 ns-HBP 组中高于 s-HBP 组,在基底 LV 节段差异最明显。右心室功能参数(TAPSE 和 S')无差异。

结论

ns-HBP 和 s-HBP 模式在心室功能方面似乎相似。ns-HBP 时,不同步参数明显更高,但差异似乎较小,其对 LV 功能的影响需要更大的长期研究来阐明。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验