Krause Andrew R, Speacht Toni A, Steiner Jennifer L, Lang Charles H, Donahue Henry J
Department of Orthopaedics, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, 17033-2391, USA.
Department of Nutrition, Food and Exercise Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.
NPJ Microgravity. 2020 Dec 3;6(1):36. doi: 10.1038/s41526-020-00126-4.
Space travel and prolonged bed rest are examples of mechanical unloading that induce significant muscle and bone loss. The compromised structure and function of bone and muscle owing to unloading make the reloading period a high risk for injury. To explore interactions between skeletal bone and muscle during reloading, we hypothesized that acute external mechanical loading of bone in combination with re-ambulation facilitates the proportional recovery of bone and muscle lost during hind limb suspension (HLS) unloading. Adult male C57Bl/6J mice were randomly assigned to a HLS or time-matched ground control (GC) group. After 2-weeks of HLS, separate groups of mice were studied at day 14 (no re-ambulation), day 28 (14 days re-ambulation) and day 56 (42 days re-ambulation); throughout the re-ambulation period, one limb received compressive mechanical loading and the contralateral limb served as an internal control. HLS induced loss of trabecular bone volume (BV/TV; -51 ± 2%) and muscle weight (-15 ± 2%) compared to GC at day 14. At day 28, the left tibia (re-ambulation only) of HLS mice had recovered approximately 20% of BV/TV lost during HLS, while the right tibia (re-ambulation and acute external mechanical loading) recovered to GC values of BV/TV (~100% recovery). At day 56, the right tibia continued to recover bone for some outcomes (trabecular BV/TV, trabecular thickness), while the left limb did not. Cortical bone displayed a delayed response to HLS, with a 10% greater decrease in BV/TV at day 28 compared to day 14. In contrast to bone, acute external mechanical loading during the re-ambulation period did not significantly increase muscle mass or protein synthesis in the gastrocnemius, compared to re-ambulation alone. Our results suggest acute external mechanical loading facilitates the recovery of bone during reloading following HLS unloading, but this does not translate to a concomitant recovery of muscle mass.
太空旅行和长期卧床休息是导致显著肌肉和骨质流失的机械性卸载的例子。由于卸载导致的骨骼和肌肉结构与功能受损,使得重新加载期成为受伤的高风险期。为了探究重新加载过程中骨骼与肌肉之间的相互作用,我们假设对骨骼进行急性外部机械加载并结合重新行走,有助于后肢悬吊(HLS)卸载期间损失的骨骼和肌肉按比例恢复。成年雄性C57Bl/6J小鼠被随机分配到HLS组或时间匹配的地面对照组(GC)。在进行2周的HLS后,分别在第14天(无重新行走)、第28天(14天重新行走)和第56天(42天重新行走)对不同组的小鼠进行研究;在整个重新行走期间,一侧肢体接受压缩性机械加载,对侧肢体作为内部对照。与第14天的GC组相比,HLS导致小梁骨体积(BV/TV;-51±2%)和肌肉重量(-15±2%)减少。在第28天,HLS小鼠的左胫骨(仅重新行走)恢复了HLS期间损失的约20%的BV/TV,而右胫骨(重新行走并进行急性外部机械加载)恢复到GC组的BV/TV值(~100%恢复)。在第56天,右胫骨在一些指标(小梁BV/TV、小梁厚度)上继续恢复骨骼,而左肢则没有。皮质骨对HLS的反应延迟,与第14天相比,第28天的BV/TV减少了10%。与骨骼不同,在重新行走期间进行急性外部机械加载与单独重新行走相比,并未显著增加腓肠肌的肌肉质量或蛋白质合成。我们的结果表明,急性外部机械加载有助于HLS卸载后重新加载期间骨骼的恢复,但这并未转化为肌肉质量的相应恢复。