Brotto Marco, Bonewald Lynda
Muscle Biology Research Group-MUBIG, UMKC School of Nursing & Health Studies, 2464 Charlotte, USA; UMKC School of Medicine, 2464 Charlotte, USA.
Bone Biology/Mineralized Tissue Research Program, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, UMKC School of Dentistry, 650 East 25th Street, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.
Bone. 2015 Nov;80:109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.02.010.
The musculoskeletal system is significantly more complex than portrayed by traditional reductionist approaches that have focused on and studied the components of this system separately. While bone and skeletal muscle are the two largest tissues within this system, this system also includes tendons, ligaments, cartilage, joints and other connective tissues along with vascular and nervous tissues. Because the main function of this system is locomotion, the mechanical interaction among the major players of this system is essential for the many shapes and forms observed in vertebrates and even in invertebrates. Thus, it is logical that the mechanical coupling theories of musculoskeletal development exert a dominant influence on our understanding of the biology of the musculoskeletal system, because these relationships are relatively easy to observe, measure, and perturb. Certainly much less recognized is the molecular and biochemical interaction among the individual players of the musculoskeletal system. In this brief review article, we first introduce some of the key reasons why the mechanical coupling theory has dominated our view of bone-muscle interactions followed by summarizing evidence for the secretory nature of bones and muscles. Finally, a number of highly physiological questions that cannot be answered by the mechanical theories alone will be raised along with different lines of evidence that support both a genetic and a biochemical communication between bones and muscles. It is hoped that these discussions will stimulate new insights into this fertile and promising new way of defining the relationships between these closely related tissues. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for biochemical communication between bone and muscle is important not only from a basic research perspective but also as a means to identify potential new therapies for bone and muscle diseases, especially for when they co-exist. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Muscle Bone Interactions".
肌肉骨骼系统比传统的还原论方法所描绘的要复杂得多,传统还原论方法分别关注和研究该系统的各个组成部分。虽然骨骼和骨骼肌是该系统中两个最大的组织,但该系统还包括肌腱、韧带、软骨、关节和其他结缔组织,以及血管和神经组织。由于该系统的主要功能是运动,因此该系统主要组成部分之间的机械相互作用对于脊椎动物甚至无脊椎动物中观察到的多种形状和形态至关重要。因此,肌肉骨骼发育的机械耦合理论对我们理解肌肉骨骼系统的生物学产生主导影响是合乎逻辑的,因为这些关系相对容易观察、测量和扰动。当然,肌肉骨骼系统各个组成部分之间的分子和生化相互作用则鲜为人知。在这篇简短的综述文章中,我们首先介绍机械耦合理论主导我们对骨-肌肉相互作用观点的一些关键原因,然后总结骨骼和肌肉分泌性质的证据。最后,将提出一些仅靠机械理论无法回答的高度生理学问题,以及支持骨骼和肌肉之间遗传和生化通讯的不同证据线索。希望这些讨论将激发对这种定义这些密切相关组织之间关系的富有成效且前景广阔的新方法的新见解。了解负责骨骼和肌肉之间生化通讯的细胞和分子机制不仅从基础研究的角度来看很重要,而且作为识别骨骼和肌肉疾病潜在新疗法的一种手段也很重要,尤其是当它们同时存在时。本文是名为“肌肉-骨骼相互作用”的特刊的一部分。