Krishnamurthy Arvind, Ramshankar Vijayalakshmi
Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), 38, Sardar Patel Rd, Adyar, Chennai, 600036 India.
Department of Preventive Oncology (Research), Cancer Institute (WIA), 38, Sardar Patel Rd, Adyar, Chennai, 600036 India.
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;11(4):752-761. doi: 10.1007/s13193-019-00910-z. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
Cervical cancer continues to be a global health problem; despite the potential for prevention through organised screening programmes that can detect and treat pre-cancerous lesions and also more recently, the availability of HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) vaccines. While routine screening with Pap smear testing has reduced the burden of cervical cancer in the high-income countries, the implementation of organised Pap-based screening programmes has not been found feasible in low-resource settings due to a lack of health care delivery infrastructure and limited health budgets. The well-established causal relationship between cervical cancer development and high-risk-HPV (HR-HPV) infection and the subsequent appreciation of the greater sensitivity of HPV testing over Pap smear cytology eventually lead to HPV testing being incorporated in the primary cervical cancer prevention programmes. An organised cervical cancer screening programme incorporating HR-HPV testing and HPV vaccine administration are currently considered to be the two major interventions for a comprehensive cervical cancer control programme worldwide. However, there are concerns that the requirement of a sophisticated infrastructure with its associated costs may make cervical cancer screening using molecular prevention by HPV testing impracticable to be implemented, especially in resource-poor, low-income countries. Visual Inspection with Acetic acid (VIA) represents one of the alternative methods for cervical cancer screening proposed for the countries with low- to middle-income resources and has gained popularity in India following the successful completion of two randomised controlled trials, but this method but has low sensitivity to detect cervical pre-cancers. More recently, the cost-effectiveness analysis of many studies including randomised controlled trials, even from the low-resource settings, has found that HPV testing is followed by treatment for HPV-positive women to be an effective and cost-effective screening strategy as compared to other screening methods including VIA. The incorporation of self-sampling and HPV testing by partial genotyping has the potential to significantly add to the effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness. The current status and future perspectives of molecular prevention strategies for cervical cancer prevention is further discussed.
宫颈癌仍然是一个全球性的健康问题;尽管通过有组织的筛查项目可以预防宫颈癌,这些项目能够检测和治疗癌前病变,而且最近还可获得人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗。虽然巴氏涂片检测的常规筛查减轻了高收入国家的宫颈癌负担,但由于缺乏卫生保健服务基础设施和卫生预算有限,在资源匮乏地区实施基于巴氏涂片的有组织筛查项目并不可行。宫颈癌发展与高危型HPV(HR-HPV)感染之间已明确的因果关系,以及随后认识到HPV检测比巴氏涂片细胞学检查具有更高的敏感性,最终导致HPV检测被纳入原发性宫颈癌预防项目。纳入HR-HPV检测和HPV疫苗接种的有组织宫颈癌筛查项目,目前被认为是全球综合性宫颈癌控制项目的两项主要干预措施。然而,有人担心,复杂基础设施及其相关成本的要求可能使采用HPV检测进行分子预防的宫颈癌筛查难以实施,尤其是在资源匮乏的低收入国家。醋酸目视检查(VIA)是为中低收入资源国家提议的宫颈癌筛查替代方法之一,在两项随机对照试验成功完成后,该方法在印度受到欢迎,但这种方法检测宫颈原位癌的敏感性较低。最近,许多研究(包括随机对照试验,甚至来自资源匮乏地区的研究)的成本效益分析发现,与包括VIA在内的其他筛查方法相比,对HPV阳性女性进行HPV检测后再治疗是一种有效且具有成本效益的筛查策略。采用自我采样和部分基因分型进行HPV检测有可能显著提高有效性和成本效益。本文将进一步讨论宫颈癌预防分子预防策略的现状和未来前景。