Rouhan Germinal, Gaudeul Myriam
Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Université, Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Université des Antilles, CNRS, Paris, France.
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2222:1-38. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0997-2_1.
Taxonomy is the science that explores, describes, names, and classifies all organisms. In this introductory chapter, we highlight the major historical steps in the elaboration of this science, which provides baseline data for all fields of biology and plays a vital role for society but is also an independent, complex, and sound hypothesis-driven scientific discipline.In a first part, we underline that plant taxonomy is one of the earliest scientific disciplines that emerged thousands of years ago, even before the important contributions of the Greeks and Romans (e.g., Theophrastus, Pliny the Elder, and Dioscorides). In the fifteenth-sixteenth centuries, plant taxonomy benefited from the Great Navigations, the invention of the printing press, the creation of botanic gardens, and the use of the drying technique to preserve plant specimens. In parallel with the growing body of morpho-anatomical data, subsequent major steps in the history of plant taxonomy include the emergence of the concept of natural classification , the adoption of the binomial naming system (with the major role of Linnaeus) and other universal rules for the naming of plants, the formulation of the principle of subordination of characters, and the advent of the evolutionary thought. More recently, the cladistic theory (initiated by Hennig) and the rapid advances in DNA technologies allowed to infer phylogenies and to propose true natural, genealogy-based classifications.In a second part, we put the emphasis on the challenges that plant taxonomy faces nowadays. The still very incomplete taxonomic knowledge of the worldwide flora (the so-called taxonomic impediment) is seriously hampering conservation efforts that are especially crucial as biodiversity has entered its sixth extinction crisis. It appears mainly due to insufficient funding, lack of taxonomic expertise, and lack of communication and coordination. We then review recent initiatives to overcome these limitations and to anticipate how taxonomy should and could evolve. In particular, the use of molecular data has been era-splitting for taxonomy and may allow an accelerated pace of species discovery. We examine both strengths and limitations of such techniques in comparison to morphology-based investigations, we give broad recommendations on the use of molecular tools for plant taxonomy, and we highlight the need for an integrative taxonomy based on evidence from multiple sources.
分类学是一门探索、描述、命名和分类所有生物的科学。在本章引言中,我们将重点介绍这门科学发展过程中的主要历史阶段。分类学为生物学的各个领域提供了基础数据,对社会起着至关重要的作用,同时它也是一门独立、复杂且基于合理假设的科学学科。在第一部分,我们强调植物分类学是数千年前最早出现的科学学科之一,甚至早于希腊人和罗马人(如泰奥弗拉斯托斯、老普林尼和狄奥斯科里季斯)做出重要贡献之前。在15至16世纪,植物分类学受益于大航海、印刷术的发明、植物园的创建以及利用干燥技术保存植物标本。随着形态解剖学数据的不断积累,植物分类学历史上随后的主要阶段包括自然分类概念的出现、双名命名系统的采用(林奈起了主要作用)以及其他植物命名的通用规则、性状从属原则的制定以及进化思想的出现。最近,分支系统学理论(由亨尼希发起)和DNA技术的飞速发展使得推断系统发育关系并提出基于真正自然的、基于谱系的分类成为可能。在第二部分,我们着重介绍当今植物分类学面临的挑战。全球植物区系的分类学知识仍然非常不完整(即所谓的分类学障碍),这严重阻碍了保护工作,而在生物多样性进入第六次灭绝危机的当下,保护工作尤为关键。这主要是由于资金不足、缺乏分类学专业知识以及缺乏沟通与协调。然后,我们回顾了最近为克服这些限制并预测分类学应如何以及可能如何发展而采取的举措。特别是,分子数据的使用对分类学来说具有划时代的意义,可能会加快物种发现的速度。我们将此类技术与基于形态学的研究进行比较,考察其优势和局限性,就植物分类学中分子工具的使用给出广泛建议,并强调需要基于多源证据的综合分类学。