• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

那些重要的人不在乎是否重要?帮派成员与不良同伴群体成员身份对标签过程的影响。

Does it matter if those who matter don't mind? Effects of gang versus delinquent peer group membership on labeling processes.

作者信息

Buchanan Molly, Krohn Marvin D

机构信息

Department of Criminal Justice, Marist College.

Department of Sociology and Criminology & Law, University of Florida.

出版信息

Criminology. 2020 May;58(2):280-306. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12237. Epub 2019 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1111/1745-9125.12237
PMID:33303997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7723348/
Abstract

Despite renewed interests in the labeling perspective and the impact of official intervention on individuals' future outcomes, scant attention has been given to potential conditioning factors for theorized labeling processes. We argue that, when viewed through a symbolic interactionist lens, variations in the nature of primary social groups, through which individuals filter official labels like arrest, may generate patterns for subsequent self-concept and delinquency that are contrary to what labeling theory indicates. To test our rationale, we offer a moderated mediation model in which gang membership is expected to differentially impact the effect of arrest on future delinquency through an intermediary mechanism: self-esteem. We test a gang-nongang dichotomy and then probe further to test whether hypothesized effects are gang specific or occur similarly for nongang youths with highly delinquent peer groups. Analyzed using Rochester Youth Development Study (RYDS) data (N = 961), comparisons between gang members and nonaffiliated youths with similarly highly delinquent peer groups revealed no significant differences in conditional indirect effects of arrest on self-esteem and future delinquency; the two groups were similarly insulated from any negative impact of arrest on self-esteem. For nongang youths with fewer delinquent peers, however, arrest significantly reduced later self-esteem, which in turn increased their future delinquency.

摘要

尽管人们对标签视角以及官方干预对个人未来结果的影响重新产生了兴趣,但对于理论化的标签过程的潜在调节因素却很少有人关注。我们认为,从符号互动主义的视角来看,主要社会群体性质的差异可能会产生与标签理论所表明的相反的后续自我概念和犯罪模式,而个人正是通过这些主要社会群体来过滤诸如逮捕之类的官方标签。为了检验我们的理论依据,我们提供了一个有调节的中介模型,在这个模型中,帮派成员身份预计会通过一个中介机制——自尊,对逮捕对未来犯罪的影响产生不同的作用。我们先检验了帮派与非帮派的二分法,然后进一步探究假设的影响是特定于帮派的,还是在有高度犯罪同伴群体的非帮派青少年中也同样会出现。使用罗切斯特青年发展研究(RYDS)数据(N = 961)进行分析后发现,帮派成员与有同样高度犯罪同伴群体的非帮派青少年之间,在逮捕对自尊和未来犯罪的条件间接效应上没有显著差异;这两组人在逮捕对自尊的任何负面影响方面都同样具有免疫力。然而,对于犯罪同伴较少的非帮派青少年来说,逮捕会显著降低他们后来的自尊,这反过来又增加了他们未来的犯罪行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc5/7723348/e19b44e4b583/nihms-1066545-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc5/7723348/c1d1dd8726c2/nihms-1066545-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc5/7723348/39a22e28e973/nihms-1066545-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc5/7723348/e19b44e4b583/nihms-1066545-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc5/7723348/c1d1dd8726c2/nihms-1066545-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc5/7723348/39a22e28e973/nihms-1066545-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cc5/7723348/e19b44e4b583/nihms-1066545-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Does it matter if those who matter don't mind? Effects of gang versus delinquent peer group membership on labeling processes.那些重要的人不在乎是否重要?帮派成员与不良同伴群体成员身份对标签过程的影响。
Criminology. 2020 May;58(2):280-306. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12237. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
2
Factors associated with youth gang membership in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家与青少年帮派成员身份相关的因素:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 29;14(1):1-128. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.11. eCollection 2018.
3
Gang involvement: psychological and behavioral characteristics of gang members, peripheral youth, and nongang youth.团伙参与:团伙成员、边缘青年和非团伙青年的心理和行为特征。
Aggress Behav. 2010 Nov-Dec;36(6):423-36. doi: 10.1002/ab.20360.
4
Pride and prejudice in high school gang members.高中帮派成员中的骄傲与偏见。
Adolescence. 1994 Summer;29(114):279-91.
5
Youth gangs, delinquency and drug use: a test of the selection, facilitation, and enhancement hypotheses.青少年帮派、犯罪与吸毒:对选择、促进和强化假说的检验。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;46(11):1178-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.00423.x.
6
Dual Trajectories of Gang Affiliation and Delinquent Peer Association During Adolescence: An Examination of Long-Term Offending Outcomes.青少年时期帮派关系和不良同伴交往的双重轨迹:对长期犯罪结果的考察。
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Apr;45(4):746-62. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0417-2. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
7
Youth gang membership and serious violent victimization: the importance of lifestyles and routine activities.青少年帮派成员身份与严重暴力受害情况:生活方式和日常活动的重要性
J Interpers Violence. 2008 Oct;23(10):1441-64. doi: 10.1177/0886260508314306. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
8
Gang membership between ages 5 and 17 years in the United States.美国5至17岁人群中的帮派成员情况。
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Apr;56(4):414-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.11.018. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
9
Estimating the effect of gang membership on nonviolent and violent delinquency: a counterfactual analysis.估算团伙成员身份对非暴力犯罪和暴力犯罪的影响:反事实分析。
Aggress Behav. 2010 Nov-Dec;36(6):437-51. doi: 10.1002/ab.20359.
10
Cognitive-behavioural interventions for preventing youth gang involvement for children and young people (7-16).针对7至16岁儿童及青少年预防其卷入青少年帮派的认知行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16(2):CD007008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007008.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Reconsidering the "gang effect" in the face of intermittency: Do first- and second-time gang membership both matter?面对间歇性情况重新审视“帮派效应”:初次和再次加入帮派都有影响吗?
Criminology. 2021 Aug;59(3):419-453. doi: 10.1111/1745-9125.12274. Epub 2021 May 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Escape from Violence: What Reduces the Enduring Consequences of Adolescent Gang Affiliation?逃离暴力:是什么减轻了青少年帮派关系带来的持久影响?
J Crim Justice. 2016 Dec;47:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
2
An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation.线性调节中介效应的指标与检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(1):1-22. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.962683.
3
The Developmental Dynamics of Joining a Gang in Adolescence: Patterns and Predictors of Gang Membership.青少年加入帮派的发展动态:帮派成员身份的模式与预测因素
J Res Adolesc. 2014 Jun 1;24(2):204-219. doi: 10.1111/jora.12121.
4
Examining moderation analyses in propensity score methods: application to depression and substance use.倾向得分法中的调节分析检验:在抑郁症和物质使用中的应用
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Oct;82(5):773-83. doi: 10.1037/a0036515. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
5
Risk and protective factors associated with gang affiliation among high-risk youth: a public health approach.与高危青少年帮派关联相关的风险和保护因素:一种公共卫生方法。
Inj Prev. 2012 Aug;18(4):253-8. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040083. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
6
A general model for testing mediation and moderation effects.一种用于检验中介效应和调节效应的通用模型。
Prev Sci. 2009 Jun;10(2):87-99. doi: 10.1007/s11121-008-0109-6.
7
Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world.缺失数据分析:使其在现实世界中发挥作用。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:549-76. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530.
8
Demonstration and evaluation of a method for assessing mediated moderation.一种评估中介调节作用方法的演示与评估
Behav Res Methods. 2006 Feb;38(1):77-87. doi: 10.3758/bf03192752.
9
Boys who join gangs: a prospective study of predictors of first gang entry.加入帮派的男孩:首次加入帮派的预测因素的前瞻性研究。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1999 Aug;27(4):261-76. doi: 10.1023/b:jacp.0000039775.83318.57.
10
Determinants of self-esteem among labeled adolescents.被贴上标签的青少年自尊的决定因素。
Soc Psychol Q. 1983 Mar;46(1):3-10.