Suppr超能文献

在控制最近配对效应的同时进行可靠的相关线索提示。

Reliable Correlational Cuing While Controlling for Most-Recent-Pairing Effects.

作者信息

Xu Guangjun, Mordkoff J Toby

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 16;11:592377. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592377. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Irrelevant aspects of the environment or irrelevant attributes of task-relevant stimuli can have important and reliable effects on behavior. When the specific values of an irrelevant attribute are correlated with different responses, a correlational-cuing effect is observed: faster and more accurate responses when the correlation is positive. Previous work has shown that this effect is not due to simple differences in how often the specific stimuli or attributes are being presented, and most explanations of the effect have stressed the clear parallels with classical associative learning. There are alternative explanations, however, that center on instances, episodes, or events, instead of associative learning. One such model posits that transient bindings between irrelevant stimulus attributes and responses (i.e., most-recent-pairings) may be responsible for the correlation-cuing effect and some recent work has found no evidence of correlational cuing when most-recent-pairings are taken into account. However, the experimental conditions that were employed previously may not have been optimized for associative learning. A new experiment that was designed to emphasize associative learning was conducted and produced reliable evidence of correlational cuing even when controlling for most-recent-pairing effects.

摘要

环境中的无关方面或任务相关刺激的无关属性可能会对行为产生重要且可靠的影响。当一个无关属性的特定值与不同反应相关联时,就会观察到相关提示效应:当相关性为正时,反应更快且更准确。先前的研究表明,这种效应并非源于特定刺激或属性呈现频率的简单差异,并且对该效应的大多数解释都强调了与经典联想学习的明显相似之处。然而,也有其他解释,这些解释以实例、情节或事件为中心,而非联想学习。一种这样的模型假定,无关刺激属性与反应之间的瞬时绑定(即最近配对)可能是相关提示效应的原因,并且一些近期研究发现,当考虑最近配对时,没有相关提示的证据。然而,先前采用的实验条件可能并未针对联想学习进行优化。进行了一项旨在强调联想学习的新实验,即使在控制最近配对效应时,也产生了相关提示的可靠证据。

相似文献

1
Reliable Correlational Cuing While Controlling for Most-Recent-Pairing Effects.
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 16;11:592377. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592377. eCollection 2020.
2
Response time modeling reveals multiple contextual cuing mechanisms.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1644-1665. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1364-y.
3
Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jul;40(4):1002-24. doi: 10.1037/a0035981. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
5
Local probability effects of repeating irrelevant attributes.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jan;79(1):230-242. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1200-x.
7
Auditory-visual contextual cuing effect.
Percept Psychophys. 2007 Nov;69(8):1399-408. doi: 10.3758/bf03192955.
8
Correlational cuing as a function of target complexity and target-flanker similarity.
Percept Psychophys. 1999 Feb;61(2):275-90. doi: 10.3758/bf03206888.
9
Role of the hippocampal system in associative learning beyond the spatial domain.
Brain. 2003 May;126(Pt 5):1202-23. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg103.
10
Gaze Cuing Effects in Peripheral Vision.
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 4;10:708. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00708. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term Contingency Learning Depends on Contingency Awareness.
J Cogn. 2025 Feb 11;8(1):23. doi: 10.5334/joc.433. eCollection 2025.
2
Context-specific adaptation for head fakes in basketball: a study on player-specific fake-frequency schedules.
Psychol Res. 2024 Jul;88(5):1702-1711. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01977-2. Epub 2024 May 28.
3
Task switch costs scale with dissimilarity between task rules.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jul;153(7):1873-1886. doi: 10.1037/xge0001598. Epub 2024 May 2.
4
One Link to Link Them All.
Exp Psychol. 2024 Jan 30;70(5):259-70. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000597.

本文引用的文献

1
Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC).
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 May;24(5):375-387. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
2
The Law of Recency: An Episodic Stimulus-Response Retrieval Account of Habit Acquisition.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 15;10:2927. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02927. eCollection 2019.
3
Contingency learning as binding? Testing an exemplar view of the colour-word contingency learning effect.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 May;73(5):739-761. doi: 10.1177/1747021820906397. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
4
The acquisition of simple associations as observed in color-word contingency learning.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jan;44(1):99-106. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000436. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
5
Stimulus recognition occurs under high perceptual load: Evidence from correlated flankers.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Dec;42(12):2077-2083. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000278.
7
Contingency Learning Tracks With Stimulus-Response Proportion.
Exp Psychol. 2016 Mar;63(2):79-88. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000313.
8
Learning, awareness, and instruction: subjective contingency awareness does matter in the colour-word contingency learning paradigm.
Conscious Cogn. 2012 Dec;21(4):1754-68. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Nov 11.
9
Feature integration without visual attention: evidence from the correlated flankers task.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Apr;15(2):385-9. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.2.385.
10
The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 May;34(3):514-23. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.514.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验