Suppr超能文献

响应时间建模揭示了多种上下文提示机制。

Response time modeling reveals multiple contextual cuing mechanisms.

机构信息

School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.

School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1644-1665. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1364-y.

Abstract

Contextual cuing refers to a response time (RT) benefit that occurs when observers search through displays that have been repeated over the course of an experiment. Although it is generally agreed that contextual cuing arises via an associative learning mechanism, there is uncertainty about the type(s) of process(es) that allow learning to influence RT. We contrast two leading accounts of the contextual cuing effect that differ in terms of the general process that is credited with producing the effect. The first, the expedited search account, attributes the cuing effect to an increase in the speed with which the target is acquired. The second, the decision threshold account, attributes the cuing effect to a reduction in the response threshold used by observers when making a subsequent decision about the target (e.g., judging its orientation). We use the diffusion model to contrast the quantitative predictions of these two accounts at the level of individual observers. Our use of the diffusion model allows us to also explore a novel decision-level locus of the cuing effect based on perceptual learning. This novel account attributes the RT benefit to a perceptual learning process that increases the quality of information used to drive the decision process. Our results reveal both individual differences in the process(es) involved in contextual cuing but also identify several striking regularities across observers. We find strong support for both the decision threshold account as well as the novel perceptual learning account. We find relatively weak support for the expedited search account.

摘要

语境线索是指当观察者在实验过程中重复多次的显示中进行搜索时,出现的响应时间(RT)优势。虽然普遍认为语境线索是通过联想学习机制产生的,但对于允许学习影响 RT 的过程(s)的类型仍存在不确定性。我们对比了两种语境线索效应的主要解释,它们在被认为产生效应的一般过程方面存在差异。第一个解释是快速搜索解释,它将线索效应归因于目标获取速度的提高。第二个解释是决策阈值解释,它将线索效应归因于观察者在随后对目标做出决策(例如判断其方向)时使用的响应阈值的降低。我们使用扩散模型在个体观察者的水平上对比这两种解释的定量预测。我们对扩散模型的使用还允许我们根据知觉学习探索线索效应的新的决策水平的位置。这个新的解释将 RT 优势归因于一个知觉学习过程,该过程提高了用于驱动决策过程的信息质量。我们的结果揭示了语境线索中涉及的过程(s)的个体差异,但也确定了观察者之间的几个显著规律。我们强烈支持决策阈值解释和新的知觉学习解释,对快速搜索解释的支持相对较弱。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验