Thomas Owen, Ramsay Alistair, Yiasemidou Marina, Hardie Claire, Ashmore Daniel, Macklin Christopher, Bandyopadhyay Dibyendu, Burke Joshua R, Jayne David
Leeds Institute of Biomedical & Clinical Sciences, Clinical Sciences Building, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
The John Golligher Colorectal Surgery Unit, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Nov 27;60:654-659. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.068. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Cutaneous abscesses are one of the most common acute general surgery presentations. This study aimed to understand the current practice in the management of cutaneous abscesses in the United Kingdom (UK), once the decision has been made that acute surgical incision and drainage (I&D) is required.
General surgeons from across the UK were surveyed on their opinions on the optimum management of cutaneous abscesses. Outcomes measured included anaesthesia, incision technique, antibiotic administration, departmental abscess pathways, and post-drainage management. A combination of Likert scales, multiple-choice questions, and short answer questions were used. Comparisons were made of Likert scales between regions using a two-sample independent -test. The survey was peer reviewed and distributed through the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) network between April and June 2018.
Sixty-one responses were collected from surgeons throughout the UK. Of these respondents, 69% indicated that cutaneous abscesses would always or usually require a General Anaesthetic (GA) for treatment, and 82% indicated that abscesses were at least sometimes not treated until the next day due to a lack of resources. While 79% of surgeons stated that pus swabs are always or are usually taken, 44% of respondents never or rarely chased the results. The main indications for giving antibiotics were sepsis/systemically unwell patients, and cellulitis. 31% of responding centres had an abscess management protocol, and 82% of respondents confirmed that they would always pack the abscess wound post-operatively.
'Incision and drainage' is currently the most widely used technique for the surgical management of cutaneous abscess. However, this study demonstrates the significant variability in the use of anaesthesia, antibiotics, packing and the use of protocols to guide and streamline patient management.
皮肤脓肿是普通外科最常见的急性病症之一。本研究旨在了解在英国,一旦决定需要进行急性手术切开引流(I&D),目前皮肤脓肿的治疗现状。
对英国各地的普通外科医生进行调查,了解他们对皮肤脓肿最佳治疗方法的看法。测量的结果包括麻醉、切开技术、抗生素使用、科室脓肿治疗流程以及引流后管理。采用李克特量表、多项选择题和简答题相结合的方式。使用两样本独立t检验对不同地区的李克特量表进行比较。该调查经过同行评审,并于2018年4月至6月通过大不列颠及爱尔兰结直肠外科学会(ACPGBI)网络进行分发。
共收集到来自英国各地外科医生的61份回复。在这些受访者中,69%表示皮肤脓肿治疗通常或总是需要全身麻醉(GA),82%表示由于资源不足,脓肿有时至少要等到第二天才进行治疗。虽然79%的外科医生表示总是或通常会采集脓液拭子,但44%的受访者从未或很少追踪结果。使用抗生素的主要指征是败血症/全身不适患者以及蜂窝织炎。31%的回复中心有脓肿管理方案,82%的受访者确认他们术后总是会对脓肿伤口进行填塞。
“切开引流”是目前皮肤脓肿外科治疗中使用最广泛的技术。然而,本研究表明,在麻醉、抗生素使用、填塞以及使用方案来指导和简化患者管理方面存在显著差异。