• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于原则的句子处理模型中的特征选择方法。

A Principled Approach to Feature Selection in Models of Sentence Processing.

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, University of Potsdam.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2020 Dec;44(12):e12918. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12918.

DOI:10.1111/cogs.12918
PMID:33306205
Abstract

Among theories of human language comprehension, cue-based memory retrieval has proven to be a useful framework for understanding when and how processing difficulty arises in the resolution of long-distance dependencies. Most previous work in this area has assumed that very general retrieval cues like [+subject] or [+singular] do the work of identifying (and sometimes misidentifying) a retrieval target in order to establish a dependency between words. However, recent work suggests that general, handpicked retrieval cues like these may not be enough to explain illusions of plausibility (Cunnings & Sturt, 2018), which can arise in sentences like The letter next to the porcelain plate shattered. Capturing such retrieval interference effects requires lexically specific features and retrieval cues, but handpicking the features is hard to do in a principled way and greatly increases modeler degrees of freedom. To remedy this, we use well-established word embedding methods for creating distributed lexical feature representations that encode information relevant for retrieval using distributed retrieval cue vectors. We show that the similarity between the feature and cue vectors (a measure of plausibility) predicts total reading times in Cunnings and Sturt's eye-tracking data. The features can easily be plugged into existing parsing models (including cue-based retrieval and self-organized parsing), putting very different models on more equal footing and facilitating future quantitative comparisons.

摘要

在人类语言理解的理论中,基于线索的记忆检索已被证明是一个有用的框架,可以帮助理解在解决远距离依赖关系时何时以及如何出现处理困难。该领域的大多数先前工作都假设非常通用的检索线索(如[+主语]或[+单数])可以识别(有时会错误识别)检索目标,从而在单词之间建立依赖关系。然而,最近的工作表明,像这些通用的、精心挑选的检索线索可能不足以解释似真性错觉(Cunnings & Sturt,2018),这种错觉可能出现在像 The letter next to the porcelain plate shattered 这样的句子中。要捕捉这种检索干扰效应,需要词汇特定的特征和检索线索,但以有原则的方式精心挑选特征很难做到,并且会极大地增加建模者的自由度。为了解决这个问题,我们使用成熟的词嵌入方法来创建分布式词汇特征表示,使用分布式检索线索向量来编码与检索相关的信息。我们表明,特征向量和线索向量之间的相似性(可衡量似真性)可以预测 Cunnings 和 Sturt 的眼动追踪数据中的总阅读时间。这些特征可以轻松地插入到现有的解析模型中(包括基于线索的检索和自组织解析),使非常不同的模型处于更平等的地位,并促进未来的定量比较。

相似文献

1
A Principled Approach to Feature Selection in Models of Sentence Processing.基于原则的句子处理模型中的特征选择方法。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Dec;44(12):e12918. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12918.
2
Event-related brain potentials index cue-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension.事件相关脑电位指数在句子理解过程中基于提示的检索干扰。
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1859-69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.057. Epub 2011 Sep 5.
3
Encoding interference effects support self-organized sentence processing.编码干扰效应支持自组织的句子处理。
Cogn Psychol. 2021 Feb;124:101356. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101356. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
4
Cue integration during sentence comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence from ellipsis.句子理解中的提示整合:省略的电生理证据。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 29;13(11):e0206616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206616. eCollection 2018.
5
Encoding and Retrieval Interference in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Agreement.句子理解中的编码与检索干扰:来自一致性的证据。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 19;9:2. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00002. eCollection 2018.
6
Cue Combinatorics in Memory Retrieval for Anaphora.记忆检索中同指消解的线索组合学
Cogn Sci. 2019 Mar;43(3):e12715. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12715.
7
The Effect of Prominence and Cue Association on Retrieval Processes: A Computational Account.突出性和线索关联对检索过程的影响:一种计算解释
Cogn Sci. 2019 Dec;43(12):e12800. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12800.
8
Expectations modulate retrieval interference during ellipsis resolution.预期调节省略句解析过程中的检索干扰。
Neuropsychologia. 2023 Nov 5;190:108680. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108680. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
9
Direct evidence of memory retrieval as a source of difficulty in non-local dependencies in language.记忆提取的直接证据是非语言中远距离依存关系的困难之源。
Cogn Sci. 2013 Mar;37(2):378-94. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12021. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
10
Identifying the role of phonology in sentence-level reading.确定语音学在句子层面阅读中的作用。
J Mem Lang. 2015 Feb-Apr;79-80:18-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Parsing as a Cue-Based Retrieval Model.句法分析作为一种基于线索的检索模型。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Aug;45(8):e13020. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13020.
2
Parsing Model and a Rational Theory of Memory.解析模型与记忆的理性理论。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 23;12:657705. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657705. eCollection 2021.