• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《COVID-19 疫情预防建议依从性量表的编制、效度和信度研究》

Development, validity and reliability study of a compliance scale for the COVID-19 outbreak prevention recommendations.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey

出版信息

Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Jun 28;51(3):898-911. doi: 10.3906/sag-2005-243.

DOI:10.3906/sag-2005-243
PMID:33306335
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: During the intense periods of the COVID-19 pandemic, legal measures were taken for its containment. However, since legal precautions cannot be implemented continuously, hand washing, mask usage and obeying social distance rules are important in combating the pandemic. Complying with these rules is mostly individual decisions. The behavior of individuals has a prominent place in the course of the pandemic. In this study, we aimed to develop a scale which could measure compliance with outbreak measures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted in two stages after evaluation of the content validity of the item pool formed by the research group by experts. For construct validity, the scale subdimensions were determined in 250 people between the ages of 18-70 years at the first stage and the definitive version of the 20-item scale was constructed. In the second stage, exploratory factor analysis was repeated in a group of 484 people, and confirmatory factor analysis was performed. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients, Spearman-Brown coefficients, test-retest methods were used to determine reliability.

RESULTS

The variance explanation of the scale consisting of 20 items and two subdimensions in the explanatory factor analysis is 63.434% (n = 484). Confirmatory factor analysis resulted in CMIN/DF = 3.540, RMR = 0.043, NFI Delta 1 = 0.928, TLI rho 2 = 0.939, CFI = 0.947, RMSEA = 0.072, SRMR = 0.0368. Cronbach’s alpha value of the scale is 0.95; and the Spearman Brown coefficient equal length analysis resulted in 0.928. The temporal consistency of the scale was evaluated with the test-retest method (P = 0.893). The structure, content validity, temporal consistency, item discrimination, and internal consistency were evaluated and found to have acceptable valid, reliable properties.

CONCLUSION

The outbreak prevention recommendation compliance scale is a valid and reliable tool with which compliance with the prevention plans can be evaluated.

摘要

背景/目的:在 COVID-19 大流行的紧张时期,采取了法律措施加以控制。然而,由于法律预防措施不能持续实施,因此洗手、戴口罩和遵守社交距离规则对于抗击大流行非常重要。遵守这些规则主要是个人决定。个人行为在大流行过程中占有突出地位。在这项研究中,我们旨在开发一种可以衡量对疫情防控措施的遵守情况的量表。

材料和方法

在专家组评估研究小组形成的项目池的内容有效性后,该研究分两个阶段进行。为了构建有效性,在第一阶段,在 18-70 岁的 250 人之间确定了量表的子维度,并构建了 20 项量表的确定版本。在第二阶段,对 484 人进行了探索性因子分析,并进行了验证性因子分析。使用 Cronbach 阿尔法系数、Spearman-Brown 系数、测试-重测方法来确定可靠性。

结果

包含 20 个项目和两个子维度的量表在解释性因素分析中的方差解释率为 63.434%(n=484)。验证性因子分析得出的 CMIN/DF 为 3.540、RMR 为 0.043、NFI Delta 1 为 0.928、TLI rho 2 为 0.939、CFI 为 0.947、RMSEA 为 0.072、SRMR 为 0.0368。量表的 Cronbach 阿尔法值为 0.95;等长分析的 Spearman-Brown 系数为 0.928。使用测试-重测法评估了量表的时间一致性(P=0.893)。通过评估结构、内容有效性、时间一致性、项目区分度和内部一致性,发现其具有可接受的有效、可靠特性。

结论

疫情防控建议遵守量表是一种有效可靠的工具,可用于评估对防控计划的遵守情况。

相似文献

1
Development, validity and reliability study of a compliance scale for the COVID-19 outbreak prevention recommendations.《COVID-19 疫情预防建议依从性量表的编制、效度和信度研究》
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Jun 28;51(3):898-911. doi: 10.3906/sag-2005-243.
2
Development of a gestational diabetes risk assessment scale: a validity and reliability study.妊娠期糖尿病风险评估量表的研制:一项效度和信度研究。
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 Oct 12;53(6):1852-1862. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5755. eCollection 2023.
3
Development of the Adult Pandemic Attitude Scale (A-PAS).成人大流行态度量表(A-PAS)的编制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 10;18(12):6311. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126311.
4
Scale validation for the identification of falsified hand sanitizer: public and regulatory authorities perspectives from United Arab Emirates.识别假冒洗手液的量表验证:来自阿拉伯联合酋长国的公共和监管机构的观点。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 22;20(1):1595. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09707-0.
5
Arabic validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the 5C scale for assessment of COVID-19 vaccines psychological antecedents.5C 量表评估 COVID-19 疫苗心理前因的阿拉伯语验证和跨文化调适。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 26;16(8):e0254595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254595. eCollection 2021.
6
The psychometric properties and validity of the Turkish version of the Body Image in Pregnancy Scale (BIPS-Turkish).《孕期身体意象量表(BIPS-土耳其语版)》土耳其语版的心理测量学特性和有效性。
Women Health. 2022 Jan;62(1):21-36. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2021.2008584. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
7
Outbreak anxiety scale: Development, validity, and reliability.突发焦虑量表:编制、效度与信度
North Clin Istanb. 2021 Mar 11;8(5):443-453. doi: 10.14744/nci.2021.69077. eCollection 2021.
8
Psychometric properties and clinical utility of COVID-19-related distress scale among children and adolescents with Disabilities.COVID-19 相关疾病所致残疾儿童和青少年的心理测量特性和临床应用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Sep;229:103705. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103705. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
9
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the COVID Stress Scale.土耳其版 COVID 压力量表的有效性和可靠性。
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2021 Oct;51(5):525-536. doi: 10.4040/jkan.21106.
10
Brief adult respiratory system health status scale-community version (BARSHSS-CV): developing and evaluating the reliability and validity.简易成人呼吸系统健康状况量表-社区版(BARSHSS-CV):信效度的开发与评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 3;18(1):683. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3505-z.