• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土耳其版 COVID 压力量表的有效性和可靠性。

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the COVID Stress Scale.

机构信息

Midwifery Department, Marmara University, Health Sciences Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing, Health Sciences University, Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Korean Acad Nurs. 2021 Oct;51(5):525-536. doi: 10.4040/jkan.21106.

DOI:10.4040/jkan.21106
PMID:34737246
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the Turkish adaptation of the COVID Stress Scale (CSS) on the basis of determining the stress caused by the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, and to test its validity and reliability.

METHODS

The English CSS was translated into Turkish using forward and backward translation. Data were collected online from 360 participants. Construct validity was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and content validity. Pearson product-moment correlation, Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient, and test-retest methods were used to evaluate reliability.

RESULTS

The Turkish version of the CSS has 36 items consistent with the original scale and has five factors: COVID danger and contamination, socioeconomic consequences of COVID, COVID xenophobia, traumatic stress due to COVID, and compulsive checking for COVID. The construct validity of the Turkish version of the CSS was verified by the adjusted goodness of fit index > .85, and comparative fit index > .95. The content validity index of each item was 91%. The corrected item-total correlations of the scale ranged from .51 to .89. Internal consistency was reliable, with a Cronbach's α of .93.

CONCLUSION

The Turkish version of the CSS is valid and reliable. It can be used as a measurement tool for the assessment of COVID-related stress.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行引起的压力的土耳其适应 COVID 应激量表(CSS),并检验其有效性和可靠性。

方法

使用正向和反向翻译将英文 CSS 翻译成土耳其语。从 360 名参与者中在线收集数据。使用验证性因子分析、探索性因子分析和内容效度评估结构效度。使用皮尔逊积差相关、克朗巴赫 α 可靠性系数和测试-重测法评估可靠性。

结果

土耳其语版 CSS 有 36 个项目与原始量表一致,具有五个因素:COVID 危险和污染、COVID 的社会经济后果、COVID 仇外心理、COVID 引起的创伤性压力和对 COVID 的强迫检查。土耳其语版 CSS 的结构效度通过调整后的拟合优度指数>0.85 和比较拟合指数>0.95 得到验证。每个项目的内容效度指数为 91%。该量表的校正项目总分相关度范围为 0.51 至 0.89。内部一致性可靠,克朗巴赫 α 为 0.93。

结论

土耳其语版 CSS 具有有效性和可靠性。它可以用作评估与 COVID 相关的压力的测量工具。

相似文献

1
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the COVID Stress Scale.土耳其版 COVID 压力量表的有效性和可靠性。
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2021 Oct;51(5):525-536. doi: 10.4040/jkan.21106.
2
Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Health Professionals Communication Skills Scale.跨文化调适、可靠性和有效性的土耳其语版卫生专业人员沟通技巧量表。
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020 Dec;14(5):312-319. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
3
Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish Version of the COVID-19 Peritraumatic Distress Index.新冠疫情创伤应激指数土耳其语版本的信效度研究
Alpha Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 1;22(5):237-243. doi: 10.1530/alphapsychiatry.2021.21337. eCollection 2021 Sep.
4
Turkish Adaptation of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form.糖尿病足溃疡量表-简化版的土耳其语适应性研究。
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2020 Sep;19(3):269-274. doi: 10.1177/1534734620921036. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
5
The Turkish version of the Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire (PBQ): Examination of the validity and reliability and scale structure.土耳其语版产后依恋问卷(PBQ):信度、效度检验及量表结构分析。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Jul-Aug;77:131-139. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.03.012. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Turkish version of the Nonarthritic Hip Score.跨文化调适及土耳其版非关节炎性髋关节评分的验证。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Jul;54(4):414-422. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19177.
7
Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life Questionnaire.《日常生活中的听觉行为问卷》土耳其语版的效度和信度。
Am J Audiol. 2022 Mar 3;31(1):155-165. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00094. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
8
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
9
The psychometric properties and validity of the Turkish version of the Body Image in Pregnancy Scale (BIPS-Turkish).《孕期身体意象量表(BIPS-土耳其语版)》土耳其语版的心理测量学特性和有效性。
Women Health. 2022 Jan;62(1):21-36. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2021.2008584. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
10
Coronavirus-related health literacy level of Turkish adults: psychometric properties of the scale.土耳其成年人与冠状病毒相关的健康素养水平:量表的心理测量学特性。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Jun 1;39(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae057.

引用本文的文献

1
The long-term impact of the covid-19 pandemic on patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.新冠疫情对强迫症患者的长期影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 14;104(7):e41562. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041562.
2
Is there evidence for factorial invariance of the COVID Stress Scales? an analysis of North American and cross-cultural populations.是否有证据表明新冠疫情应激量表具有因素不变性?对北美和跨文化人群的分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 26;15:1381124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1381124. eCollection 2024.
3
Does COVID-19 related symptomatology indicate a transdiagnostic neuropsychiatric disorder? - Multidisciplinary implications.

本文引用的文献

1
[Stress, coping strategies and health-related quality of life during the corona pandemic in April 2020 in Germany].[2020年4月德国新冠疫情期间的压力、应对策略及与健康相关的生活质量]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2021 Jan;146(2):e11-e20. doi: 10.1055/a-1275-3792. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
2
Prevalence of and Risk Factors Associated With Mental Health Symptoms Among the General Population in China During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.中国新冠肺炎大流行期间普通人群心理健康症状的患病率及其相关危险因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2014053. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14053.
3
Development and initial validation of the COVID Stress Scales.
新型冠状病毒肺炎相关症状是否表明存在一种跨诊断的神经精神障碍?——多学科影响。
World J Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 19;12(8):1004-1015. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i8.1004.
4
The adaption of the Chinese version of the COVID Stress Scales as a screening instrument of stress: Psychometric properties during the COVID-19 pandemic.中文版 COVID 压力量表作为压力筛查工具的适应:COVID-19 大流行期间的心理测量特性。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 17;10:962304. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.962304. eCollection 2022.
《COVID 应激量表的编制与初步验证》
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 May;72:102232. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102232. Epub 2020 May 4.
4
Comparison of the Indicators of Psychological Stress in the Population of Hubei Province and Non-Endemic Provinces in China During Two Weeks During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in February 2020.2020 年 2 月新冠肺炎疫情期间湖北省与非疫区人群两周内心理压力指标比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Apr 15;26:e923767. doi: 10.12659/MSM.923767.
5
A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations.新冠疫情期间中国人心理困扰的全国性调查:启示与政策建议
Gen Psychiatr. 2020 Mar 6;33(2):e100213. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213. eCollection 2020.
6
Coronaphobia: Fear and the 2019-nCoV outbreak.新冠恐惧症:恐惧与2019新型冠状病毒爆发
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Mar;70:102196. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102196. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
7
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study.中国武汉 99 例 2019 年新型冠状病毒肺炎患者的流行病学和临床特征:描述性研究。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):507-513. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
8
One Size Doesn't Fit All: Using Factor Analysis to Gather Validity Evidence When Using Surveys in Your Research.一刀切不适用:在研究中使用调查时,使用因子分析收集有效性证据。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Mar;18(1):rm1. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-04-0064.
9
Exposed to events that never happen: Generalized unsafety, the default stress response, and prolonged autonomic activity.暴露于从未发生过的事件中:普遍的不安全、默认的应激反应和延长的自主活动。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Mar;74(Pt B):287-296. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.019. Epub 2016 Jul 25.