• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西的环境诊断与保护区的有效规划:二者有联系吗?

Environmental diagnoses and effective planning of Protected Areas in Brazil: Is there any connection?

机构信息

Coordenação de Elaboração e Revisão de Planos de Manejo, Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brasil.

Laboratório de Sistemas Socioecológicos, Departamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 11;15(12):e0242687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242687. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0242687
PMID:33306707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7732074/
Abstract

Protected Areas (PAs) are essential to maintaining biodiversity, while effective management plans (MPs) are essential for the management of these areas. Thus, MPs must have relevant data analyses and diagnoses to evaluate ecological conditions of PAs. We evaluated the environmental diagnoses of 126 Brazilian federal PAs, the methods used to collect data and defined the diagnostic level of PMs according to the type and number of analyzes performed for each PA category. We found a low level of diagnosis in MPs. Primary field data or research programs resulted in environmental diagnostics of higher levels. Participatory workshops and secondary data, most used in Extractive Reserves, were related to low levels of diagnoses. The most frequent analysis was the identification of threats (97% of MPs), while the least frequent were the definition of conservation targets and future scenarios for management (1.6% of MPs). Our results show that the diagnoses of the MPs need to be more analytical to generate useful information for decision-making. MPs should prioritize data analysis and specific management studies, focused on the use of natural resources, the status of conservation targets, future scenarios, and key information to planning.

摘要

保护区(PAs)对于维护生物多样性至关重要,而有效的管理计划(MPs)对于这些地区的管理至关重要。因此,MPs 必须进行相关数据分析和诊断,以评估 PAs 的生态状况。我们评估了 126 个巴西联邦保护区的环境诊断,评估了用于收集数据的方法,并根据每个保护区类别进行的分析的类型和数量定义了 MPs 的诊断水平。我们发现 MPs 中的诊断水平较低。主要的实地数据或研究计划导致了更高水平的环境诊断。参与式研讨会和二次数据,最常用于采掘保留区,与较低的诊断水平有关。最常见的分析是识别威胁(97%的 MPs),而最不常见的是确定保护目标和管理的未来情景(1.6%的 MPs)。我们的结果表明,MPs 的诊断需要更具分析性,以便为决策提供有用的信息。MPs 应优先进行数据分析和具体的管理研究,重点是自然资源的利用、保护目标的状况、未来情景以及规划的关键信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e9/7732074/cda68db62370/pone.0242687.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e9/7732074/46aa5c29f573/pone.0242687.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e9/7732074/57d612650846/pone.0242687.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e9/7732074/cda68db62370/pone.0242687.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e9/7732074/46aa5c29f573/pone.0242687.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e9/7732074/57d612650846/pone.0242687.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1e9/7732074/cda68db62370/pone.0242687.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Environmental diagnoses and effective planning of Protected Areas in Brazil: Is there any connection?巴西的环境诊断与保护区的有效规划:二者有联系吗?
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 11;15(12):e0242687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242687. eCollection 2020.
2
Adapting environmental function analysis for management of protected areas in small islands--case of Pico Island (the Azores).调整环境功能分析以用于小岛屿保护区管理——皮库岛(亚速尔群岛)案例
J Environ Manage. 2016 Apr 15;171:231-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.02.015. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
3
Uncovering assets in Brazilian national parks.发现巴西国家公园中的资源。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jun 1;287:112289. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112289. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
4
Making parks make a difference: poor alignment of policy, planning and management with protected-area impact, and ways forward.让公园发挥作用:政策、规划与管理与保护区影响的错位及未来方向
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Nov 5;370(1681). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0280.
5
Quality of governance and effectiveness of protected areas: crucial concepts for conservation planning.治理质量和保护区有效性:保护规划的关键概念。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017 Jul;1399(1):27-41. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13284. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
6
Downgrading, downsizing, degazettement, and reclassification of protected areas in Brazil.巴西保护区的降级、缩小规模、撤销公告及重新分类。
Conserv Biol. 2014 Aug;28(4):939-50. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12298. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
7
Efficiency of unlocking or locking existing protected areas for identifying complementary areas for biodiversity conservation.解锁或锁定现有保护区以确定生物多样性保护互补区域的效率。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Dec 1;694:133771. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133771. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
8
Designing a network of green infrastructure to enhance the conservation value of protected areas and maintain ecosystem services.设计绿色基础设施网络,以提高保护区的保护价值并维持生态系统服务。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 15;651(Pt 1):541-550. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.164. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
9
Understanding local-scale drivers of biodiversity outcomes in terrestrial protected areas.理解陆地保护区生物多样性成果的地方尺度驱动因素。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017 Jul;1399(1):42-60. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13154. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
10
Uniqueness of Protected Areas for Conservation Strategies in the European Union.欧盟保护区域的独特性及其在保护策略中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 24;8(1):6445. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24390-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Decision complacency and conservation planning.
Conserv Biol. 2018 Dec;32(6):1469-1472. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13124. Epub 2018 Jul 14.
2
Academics can also be culprits of evidence complacency.学术界人士也可能是证据自满的罪魁祸首。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Nov;1(11):1589. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0346-9.
3
An evaluation of contemporary savanna fire regimes in the Canastra National Park, Brazil: Outcomes of fire suppression policies.巴西卡南德拉国家公园当代稀树草原火行为的评估:火灾抑制政策的结果。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Jan 1;205:40-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.053. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
4
Environment: Deforestation soars in the Amazon.环境:亚马逊地区森林砍伐激增。
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):423. doi: 10.1038/521423b.
5
Environment and Development. Brazil's environmental leadership at risk.环境与发展。巴西的环境领导地位面临风险。
Science. 2014 Nov 7;346(6210):706-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1260194.
6
Conservation. Protected areas and effective biodiversity conservation.保护。保护区与有效的生物多样性保护。
Science. 2013 Nov 15;342(6160):803-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1239268.
7
Managers consider multiple lines of evidence important for biodiversity management decisions.管理者认为,对于生物多样性管理决策来说,多种证据来源都很重要。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Dec 30;113:341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.002. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
8
Linking management effectiveness indicators to observed effects of protected areas on fire occurrence in the Amazon rainforest.将管理有效性指标与保护区对亚马逊热带雨林火灾发生的观测效应联系起来。
Conserv Biol. 2013 Feb;27(1):155-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01930.x. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
9
A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness.保护区管理有效性的全球分析。
Environ Manage. 2010 Nov;46(5):685-98. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9564-5. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
10
Role of Brazilian Amazon protected areas in climate change mitigation.巴西亚马孙保护区在减缓气候变化中的作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 15;107(24):10821-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913048107. Epub 2010 May 26.