Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, and.
Center for Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jun 1;203(11):1386-1397. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202006-2319OC.
Approximately 40% of people worldwide are exposed to household air pollution (HAP) from the burning of biomass fuels. Previous efforts to document health benefits of HAP mitigation have been stymied by an inability to lower emissions to target levels. We sought to determine if a household air pollution intervention with liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) improved cardiopulmonary health outcomes in adult women living in a resource-poor setting in Peru. We conducted a randomized controlled field trial in 180 women aged 25-64 years living in rural Puno, Peru. Intervention women received an LPG stove, continuous fuel delivery for 1 year, education, and behavioral messaging, whereas control women were asked to continue their usual cooking practices. We assessed for stove use adherence using temperature loggers installed in both LPG and biomass stoves of intervention households. We measured blood pressure, peak expiratory flow (PEF), and respiratory symptoms using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire at baseline and at 3-4 visits after randomization. Intervention women used their LPG stove exclusively for 98% of days. We did not find differences in average postrandomization systolic blood pressure (intervention - control 0.7 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -2.1 to 3.4), diastolic blood pressure (0.3 mm Hg; -1.5 to 2.0), prebronchodilator peak expiratory flow/height (0.14 L/s/m; -0.02 to 0.29), postbronchodilator peak expiratory flow/height (0.11 L/s/m; -0.05 to 0.27), or St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score (-1.4; -3.9 to 1.2) over 1 year in intention-to-treat analysis. There were no reported harms related to the intervention. We did not find evidence of a difference in blood pressure, lung function, or respiratory symptoms during the year-long intervention with LPG. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02994680).
全球约有 40%的人受到家用空气污染(HAP)的影响,这种污染来自生物质燃料的燃烧。以前,人们试图记录家用空气污染缓解措施对健康的益处,但由于无法将排放量降低到目标水平,这些努力都受到了阻碍。我们试图确定在秘鲁一个资源匮乏的农村地区,使用液化石油气(LPG)的家用空气污染干预措施是否能改善成年女性的心肺健康结果。我们在秘鲁普诺农村地区的 180 名年龄在 25-64 岁之间的女性中进行了一项随机对照现场试验。干预组的女性获得了一个液化石油气炉、为期一年的连续燃料供应、教育和行为信息,而对照组的女性则被要求继续她们通常的烹饪习惯。我们使用安装在干预家庭的液化石油气炉和生物质炉中的温度记录仪来评估炉子的使用依从性。我们使用圣乔治呼吸问卷(St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire)在基线和随机分组后 3-4 次就诊时测量血压、呼气峰值流量(PEF)和呼吸症状。干预组的女性 98%的日子都只使用液化石油气炉。我们没有发现平均随访后收缩压(干预组-对照组 0.7mmHg;95%置信区间,-2.1 至 3.4)、舒张压(0.3mmHg;-1.5 至 2.0)、预支气管扩张剂呼气峰值流量/身高(0.14L/s/m;-0.02 至 0.29)、后支气管扩张剂呼气峰值流量/身高(0.11L/s/m;-0.05 至 0.27)或圣乔治呼吸问卷总评分(-1.4;-3.9 至 1.2)在 1 年内的意向治疗分析中有差异。报告的与干预相关的不良事件没有。我们没有发现在使用液化石油气的长达一年的干预期间,血压、肺功能或呼吸症状有差异的证据。该临床试验已在 www.clinicaltrials.gov(NCT02994680)注册。