Fandiño-Del-Rio Magdalena, Goodman Dina, Kephart Josiah L, Miele Catherine H, Williams Kendra N, Moazzami Mitra, Fung Elizabeth C, Koehler Kirsten, Davila-Roman Victor G, Lee Kathryn A, Nangia Saachi, Harvey Steven A, Steenland Kyle, Gonzales Gustavo F, Checkley William
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 1830 E. Monument St. Room 555, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Trials. 2017 Nov 3;18(1):518. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2179-x.
Biomass fuel smoke is a leading risk factor for the burden of disease worldwide. International campaigns are promoting the widespread adoption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in resource-limited settings. However, it is unclear if the introduction and use of LPG stoves, in settings where biomass fuels are used daily, reduces pollution concentration exposure, improves health outcomes, or how cultural and social barriers influence the exclusive adoption of LPG stoves.
We will conduct a randomized controlled, field intervention trial of LPG stoves and fuel distribution in rural Puno, Peru, in which we will enroll 180 female participants aged 25-64 years and follow them for 2 years. After enrollment, we will collect information on sociodemographic characteristics, household characteristics, and cooking practices. During the first year of the study, LPG stoves and fuel tanks will be delivered to the homes of 90 intervention participants. During the second year, participants in the intervention arm will keep their LPG stoves, but the gas supply will stop. Control participants will receive LPG stoves and vouchers to obtain free fuel from distributors at the beginning of the second year, but gas will not be delivered. Starting at baseline, we will collect longitudinal measurements of respiratory symptoms, pulmonary function, blood pressure, endothelial function, carotid artery intima-media thickness, 24-h dietary recalls, exhaled carbon monoxide, quality-of-life indicators, and stove-use behaviors. Environmental exposure assessments will occur six times over the 2-year follow-up period, consisting of 48-h personal exposure and kitchen concentration measurements of fine particulate matter and carbon monoxide, and 48-h kitchen concentrations of nitrogen dioxide for a subset of 100 participants.
Findings from this study will allow us to better understand behavioral patterns, environmental exposures, and cardiovascular and pulmonary outcomes resulting from the adoption of LPG stoves. If this trial indicates that LPG stoves are a feasible and effective way to reduce household air pollution and improve health, it will provide important information to support widespread adoption of LPG fuel as a strategy to reduce the global burden of disease.
ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02994680 , Cardiopulmonary Outcomes and Household Air Pollution (CHAP) Trial. Registered on 28 November 2016.
生物质燃料烟雾是全球疾病负担的主要风险因素。国际运动正在推动在资源有限的环境中广泛采用液化石油气(LPG)。然而,在每天使用生物质燃料的环境中引入和使用液化石油气炉灶是否能降低污染浓度暴露、改善健康状况,以及文化和社会障碍如何影响液化石油气炉灶的独家采用尚不清楚。
我们将在秘鲁普诺农村地区开展一项关于液化石油气炉灶和燃料分发的随机对照现场干预试验,将招募180名年龄在25至64岁之间的女性参与者,并对她们进行为期2年的跟踪。入组后,我们将收集社会人口学特征、家庭特征和烹饪习惯等信息。在研究的第一年,将向90名干预参与者的家中提供液化石油气炉灶和燃料罐。在第二年,干预组的参与者将保留他们的液化石油气炉灶,但燃气供应将停止。对照组参与者将在第二年开始时收到液化石油气炉灶和从经销商处获取免费燃料的代金券,但不会配送燃气。从基线开始,我们将对呼吸道症状、肺功能、血压、内皮功能、颈动脉内膜中层厚度、24小时饮食回忆、呼出一氧化碳、生活质量指标和炉灶使用行为进行纵向测量。在为期2年的随访期内将进行6次环境暴露评估,包括对100名参与者子集进行48小时个人暴露以及厨房细颗粒物和一氧化碳浓度测量,以及48小时厨房二氧化氮浓度测量。
本研究的结果将使我们能够更好地了解采用液化石油气炉灶所导致的行为模式、环境暴露以及心血管和肺部结局。如果该试验表明液化石油气炉灶是减少家庭空气污染和改善健康的可行且有效方法,它将提供重要信息以支持广泛采用液化石油气燃料作为减轻全球疾病负担的策略。
ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符:NCT02994680,心肺结局与家庭空气污染(CHAP)试验。于2016年11月28日注册。