Suppr超能文献

肩盂唇修复中使用带结与无结锚钉的比较:一项系统评价。

Knotted Versus Knotless Anchors for Labral Repair in the Shoulder: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, U.S.A..

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, U.S.A.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2021 Apr;37(4):1314-1321. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.11.056. Epub 2020 Dec 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare biomechanical and clinical outcomes between knotless and knotted anchors in arthroscopic labral repair, specifically in (1) Bankart repair, (2) SLAP repair, (3) posterior labral repair, and (4) remplissage augmentation of Bankart repair.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to find biomechanical and clinical studies comparing knotted and knotless anchors using the search term "knotless anchor."

RESULTS

Overall, 17 studies met inclusion criteria. There were 7 studies evaluating the biomechanical outcomes, of which 5 found mixed results between knotted and knotless anchors for arthroscopic Bankart repair, 1 demonstrated a difference for SLAP repair favoring knotless anchors, and 2 showed no significant difference for Remplissage in terms of ultimate load-to-failure. Four studies evaluated knotless labral anchors compared with knotted anchors in patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair with no significant differences in outcomes reported between the 2 anchor types, except in one study that found an improved visual analog scale score and a lower recurrence and revision rate with knotted anchors. Five studies evaluated knotless anchors compared with knotted anchors in patients undergoing SLAP repair, and none of the included studies found any significant differences in the patient reported outcome measures or revision rates. Of the 5 studies comparing operative time, 4 found a reduced time with knotless anchors.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical results show no significant differences in outcomes between knotless and knotted anchors for labral repair in the shoulder, including Bankart repair, SLAP repair, and posterior labral repair. However, there was conflicting evidence supporting knotless or knotted anchors in the biomechanical studies. However, operative times may be reduced with the use of knotless anchors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, A Systematic Review of Level II and III studies.

摘要

目的

比较关节镜下盂唇修复中无结和有结锚钉的生物力学和临床结果,特别是在(1)Bankart 修复、(2)SLAP 修复、(3)后盂唇修复和(4)Bankart 修复的填充增强中。

方法

根据 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,通过搜索术语“无结锚钉”,在 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆中搜索比较使用有结和无结锚钉的生物力学和临床研究。

结果

共有 17 项研究符合纳入标准。其中 7 项研究评估了生物力学结果,其中 5 项研究发现关节镜 Bankart 修复中,有结和无结锚钉的结果存在混合结果,1 项研究表明 SLAP 修复中无结锚钉有优势,2 项研究在最终失效负载方面无显著差异。有 4 项研究评估了无结盂唇锚钉与关节镜 Bankart 修复中使用有结锚钉的患者相比,两种锚钉类型的结果无显著差异,但有一项研究发现有结锚钉的视觉模拟评分改善,复发率和翻修率较低。有 5 项研究评估了无结锚钉与 SLAP 修复中使用有结锚钉的患者相比,纳入的研究均未发现患者报告的结果测量或翻修率有任何显著差异。在比较手术时间的 5 项研究中,有 4 项研究发现无结锚钉的手术时间更短。

结论

在肩部盂唇修复中,包括 Bankart 修复、SLAP 修复和后盂唇修复,无结和有结锚钉的临床结果无显著差异。然而,生物力学研究中有支持无结或有结锚钉的相互矛盾的证据。然而,使用无结锚钉可能会缩短手术时间。

证据水平

III,对 II 级和 III 级研究的系统评价。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验