Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Asthma. 2022 Mar;59(3):494-506. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1856869. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
Urban adolescents with asthma often have inadequate preventive care. We tested the effectiveness of the School-Based Asthma Care for Teens (SB-ACT) program on asthma morbidity and preventive medication adherence.- 12-16yr olds with persistent asthma in Rochester, NY schools. - 3-group randomized trial (2014-2019). - Two core components: 1) Directly observed therapy (DOT) of preventive asthma medications, provided in school for at least 6-8 weeks for the teen to learn proper technique and experience the benefits of daily preventive therapy; 2) 4-6 weeks later, 3 sessions of motivational interviewing (MI) to discuss potential benefits from DOT and enhance motivation to take medication independently. We included 2 comparison groups: 1) DOT-only for 6-8wks, and 2) asthma education (AE) attention control. Masked follow-up assessments were conducted at 3, 5, and 7mos. - Mean number of symptom-free days (SFDs)/2 weeks and medication adherence. - Modified intention-to-treat repeated measures analysis. We enrolled 430 teens (56% Black, 32% Hispanic, 85% Medicaid). There were no group differences at baseline. We found no difference in SFDs at any follow-up timepoint. More teens in the SB-ACT and DOT-only groups reported having a preventive asthma medication at each follow-up (<.001), and almost daily adherence at 3 and 5-months (<.001, =.003) compared to AE. By 7 months there were no significant differences between groups in adherence (=.49). SB-ACT improved preventive medication availability and short-term adherence but did not impact asthma symptoms. Further work is needed to create developmentally appropriate and effective interventions for this group.
城市青少年哮喘患者常存在预防护理不足的问题。我们检验了基于学校的青少年哮喘护理(SB-ACT)方案在哮喘发病率和预防药物依从性方面的效果。- 研究对象为纽约罗彻斯特市学校中持续存在哮喘的 12-16 岁青少年;- 三分组随机试验(2014-2019 年);- 有两个核心组成部分:1)直接观察疗法(DOT),即在校内为青少年提供至少 6-8 周的预防哮喘药物治疗,让他们学习正确的用药技术并体验每日预防疗法的益处;2)6-8 周后,开展 3 次动机性访谈(MI),讨论 DOT 的潜在益处并增强青少年独立服药的动机;- 我们纳入了两个对照组:1)仅 DOT 治疗 6-8 周,2)哮喘教育(AE)对照。在 3、5 和 7 个月时进行了掩蔽随访评估。- 无症状天数(SFD)/2 周的平均数量和药物依从性;- 采用意向治疗重复测量分析。共纳入 430 名青少年(56%为黑人,32%为西班牙裔,85%享受医疗补助)。基线时各组间无差异。在任何随访时间点,青少年 SFD 均无差异。在 SB-ACT 组和 DOT 组中,报告在每个随访时间点都有预防哮喘药物的青少年更多(<.001),且在 3 个月和 5 个月时几乎每天服药依从率更高(<.001,=.003),而 AE 组则较低。在 7 个月时,各组间的依从率无显著差异(=.49)。SB-ACT 提高了预防药物的可及性和短期依从性,但对哮喘症状无影响。需要进一步努力为该人群开发适合其发展阶段的有效干预措施。