Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2022 Feb;28(1):114-128. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2020.0244. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
Articular cartilage defects caused by injury frequently lead to osteoarthritis, a painful and costly disease. Despite widely used surgical methods to treat articular cartilage defects and a plethora of research into regenerative strategies as treatments, long-term clinical outcomes are not satisfactory. Failure to integrate repair tissue with native cartilage is a recurring issue in surgical and tissue-engineered strategies, seeing eventual degradation of the regenerated or surrounding tissue. This review delves into the current understanding of why continuous and robust integration with native cartilage is so difficult to achieve. Both the intrinsic limitations of chondrocytes to remodel injured cartilage, and the significant challenges posed by a compromised biomechanical environment are described. Recent scaffold and cell-based techniques to repair cartilage are also discussed, and limitations of existing methods to evaluate integrative repair. In particular, the importance of evaluating the mechanical integrity of the interface between native and repair tissue is highlighted as a meaningful assessment of any strategy to repair this load-bearing tissue. Impact statement The failure to integrate grafts or biomaterials with native cartilage is a major barrier to cartilage repair. An in-depth understanding of the reasons cartilage integration remains a challenge is required to inform cartilage repair strategies. In particular, this review highlights that integration of cartilage repair strategies is frequently assessed in terms of the continuity of tissue, but not the mechanical integrity. Given the load-bearing nature of cartilage, evaluating integration in terms of interfacial strength is essential to assessing the potential success of cartilage repair methods.
关节软骨损伤常导致骨关节炎,这是一种痛苦且昂贵的疾病。尽管有广泛应用的外科方法来治疗关节软骨损伤和大量研究再生策略作为治疗方法,但长期临床效果并不理想。在外科和组织工程策略中,修复组织与天然软骨无法持续且牢固地整合是一个反复出现的问题,最终会导致再生或周围组织的退化。这篇综述深入探讨了为什么难以实现与天然软骨的持续和稳健整合的原因。本文描述了软骨细胞重塑受损软骨的固有局限性,以及生物力学环境受损带来的重大挑战。还讨论了最近用于修复软骨的支架和基于细胞的技术,并讨论了评估整合修复的现有方法的局限性。特别是,强调了评估天然和修复组织之间界面的机械完整性作为评估任何修复这种承重组织的策略的重要评估。
影响陈述
未能将移植物或生物材料与天然软骨整合是软骨修复的主要障碍。为了为软骨修复策略提供信息,需要深入了解软骨整合仍然具有挑战性的原因。特别是,本综述强调,软骨修复策略的整合通常是根据组织的连续性进行评估的,而不是机械完整性。鉴于软骨的承重性质,根据界面强度评估整合对于评估软骨修复方法的潜在成功至关重要。