• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施临终患者法律的障碍:以色列的经验——一项定性研究

Barriers in implementing the dying patient law: the Israeli experience - a qualitative study.

作者信息

Zigdon Avi, Nissanholtz-Gannot Rachel

机构信息

Department of Health Systems Management, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Science Park, P.O.B. 3, 4070000, Ariel, Israel.

Smokler Center of Health Policy Research, Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute, P.O.B. 3886, 91037, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Dec 11;21(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00564-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-020-00564-5
PMID:33308218
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7731544/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coping with end-of-life issues is a major challenge for governments and health systems. Despite progress in legislation, many barriers exist to its full implementation. This study is aimed at identifying these end-of-life barriers in relation to Israel.

METHODS

Qualitative in-depth interviews using professionals and decision makers in the health-care and related systems (n = 37) were carried out, along with two focus groups based on brainstorming techniques consisting of nurses (n = 10) and social workers (n = 10). Data was managed and analyzed using Naralyzer software.

RESULTS

Qualitative analysis showed identification of six primary barriers: 1) law, procedures, and forms; 2) clinical aspects; 3) human aspects; 4) knowledge and skills of medical teams; 5) communication; and 6) resource allocation. These were further divided into 44 sub area barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the role of the family doctor in end-of-life by training physicians in decision-making workshops and increasing their knowledge in the field of palliative medicine. Effectively channeling resources, knowledge, and support for medical teams, by accounting for the structure and response of the units for home treatment will improve patient's access to information on and support for end-of-life laws, as well as reduce legislative barriers in other countries that face the same issues.

摘要

背景

应对临终问题是政府和卫生系统面临的一项重大挑战。尽管在立法方面取得了进展,但在全面实施过程中仍存在许多障碍。本研究旨在确定以色列在临终方面的这些障碍。

方法

对医疗保健及相关系统中的专业人员和决策者进行了定性深入访谈(n = 37),并基于头脑风暴技术开展了两个焦点小组讨论,一组由护士(n = 10)组成,另一组由社会工作者(n = 10)组成。使用Naralyzer软件对数据进行管理和分析。

结果

定性分析显示确定了六个主要障碍:1)法律、程序和表格;2)临床方面;3)人文方面;4)医疗团队的知识和技能;5)沟通;6)资源分配。这些障碍进一步细分为44个次领域障碍。

结论

本研究强调了家庭医生在临终关怀中的作用,通过在决策研讨会上培训医生并增加他们在姑息医学领域的知识。通过考虑家庭治疗单位的结构和反应,有效地为医疗团队提供资源、知识和支持,将改善患者获取临终法律信息和支持的机会,并减少其他面临相同问题国家的立法障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caca/7731544/71c6b4c05f62/12910_2020_564_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caca/7731544/71c6b4c05f62/12910_2020_564_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caca/7731544/71c6b4c05f62/12910_2020_564_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers in implementing the dying patient law: the Israeli experience - a qualitative study.实施临终患者法律的障碍:以色列的经验——一项定性研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Dec 11;21(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00564-5.
2
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
3
The attitudes of physicians toward the new "Dying Patient Act" enacted in Israel.以色列医生对新颁布的《临终患者法案》的态度。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2008 Oct-Nov;25(5):361-5. doi: 10.1177/1049909108319266. Epub 2008 Jun 11.
4
Understanding physicians' skills at providing end-of-life care perspectives of patients, families, and health care workers.了解医生在提供临终关怀方面的技能,包括患者、家属和医护人员的观点。
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Jan;16(1):41-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.00333.x.
5
Physician-related barriers to communication and patient- and family-centred decision-making towards the end of life in intensive care: a systematic review.重症监护室临终阶段医生在沟通以及以患者和家庭为中心的决策方面存在的相关障碍:一项系统综述
Crit Care. 2014 Nov 18;18(6):604. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0604-z.
6
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
7
End-of-life and palliative care of patients on maintenance hemodialysis treatment: a focus group study.维持性血液透析患者的终末期和姑息治疗:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Oct 30;18(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0481-y.
8
Palliative care physicians' experiences of end-of-life communication: A focus group study.姑息治疗医生的临终沟通经历:一项焦点小组研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Jan;27(1). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12728. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
9
Taboo words in pediatric oncology: Communication experiences of nurses and physicians with dying children and their families.儿科肿瘤学中的禁忌词汇:护士和医生与濒死儿童及其家庭的沟通经历
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Feb;68:102466. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102466. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
10
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
The Professional Guest: conceptualizing home visits in palliative care settings.专业访客:姑息治疗环境中家访的概念化
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Nov 17;18:26323524241293821. doi: 10.1177/26323524241293821. eCollection 2024.
2
Aging With Grace: The Quest for Integrated, Compassionate Care for Older Adults.优雅老去:寻求为老年人提供综合、关怀备至的护理
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Aug 16;10:23779608241274209. doi: 10.1177/23779608241274209. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Ethical challenges in end-stage dementia: Perspectives of professionals and family care-givers.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges in home care at the end stage of dementia: Hospice units vs. home care units. A qualitative study.痴呆症终末期家庭护理的挑战:临终关怀病房与家庭护理病房。一项定性研究。
Death Stud. 2022;46(7):1667-1677. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2020.1829748. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
2
Communication challenges in end-of-life decisions.临终决策中的沟通挑战。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Sep 18;150:w20351. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20351. eCollection 2020 Sep 7.
3
Implementing advance directives-An international literature review of important considerations for nurses.
终末期痴呆的伦理挑战:专业人士和家庭护理人员的观点。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Nov-Dec;28(7-8):1228-1243. doi: 10.1177/0969733021999748. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
实施预先指示——护士需要考虑的国际重要文献综述。
J Nurs Manag. 2020 Sep;28(6):1177-1190. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13097. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
4
Deaths after feeding-tube withdrawal from patients in vegetative and minimally conscious states: A qualitative study of family experience.植物状态和最小意识状态患者拔管后死亡:对家庭体验的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Jul;32(7):1180-1188. doi: 10.1177/0269216318766430. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
5
Paradox of choice and the illusion of autonomy: The construction of ethical subjects in right-to-die activism.选择悖论与自主性幻觉:安乐死运动中伦理主体的构建。
Death Stud. 2018 May-Jun;42(5):329-335. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2017.1396646. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
6
What can we learn from simulation-based training to improve skills for end-of-life care? Insights from a national project in Israel.从基于模拟的培训中我们可以学到什么来提高临终关怀技能?来自以色列一个国家项目的见解。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2017 Nov 6;6(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13584-017-0169-9.
7
Family Communication about End-of-Life Decisions and the Enactment of the Decision-Maker Role.关于临终决策的家庭沟通与决策者角色的履行
Behav Sci (Basel). 2017 Jun 7;7(2):36. doi: 10.3390/bs7020036.
8
Overcoming barriers in care for the dying: Theoretical analysis of an innovative program model.克服临终关怀中的障碍:一种创新项目模式的理论分析
Soc Work Health Care. 2016 Aug;55(7):503-17. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2016.1183552. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
9
Israeli Dying Patient Act: physician knowledge and attitudes.《以色列临终患者法案》:医生的认知与态度。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec;37(6):597-602. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318295b022.
10
Advance directives in english and French law: different concepts, different values, different societies.英国和法国法律中的预先指示:不同的概念、不同的价值观、不同的社会。
Health Care Anal. 2014 Mar;22(1):59-72. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0210-7.