Suppr超能文献

危重症创伤性脑损伤患者的激越、意识模糊和攻击行为——一项前瞻性队列研究(ACACIA-PILOT)

Agitation, confusion, and aggression in critically ill traumatic brain injury-a pilot cohort study (ACACIA-PILOT).

作者信息

Williamson David R, Cherifa Sofia Ihsenne, Frenette Anne Julie, Saavedra Mitjans Mar, Charbonney Emmanuel, Cataford Gabrielle, Williams Virginie, Lainer Palacios Julia, Burry Lisa, Mehta Sangeeta, Arbour Caroline, Bernard Francis

机构信息

Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

Research centre, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Dec 11;6(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00736-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Agitated behaviors are problematic in intensive care unit (ICU) patients recovering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) as they create substantial risks and challenges for healthcare providers. To date, there have been no studies evaluating their epidemiology and impact in the ICU. Prior to planning a multicenter study, assessment of recruitment, feasibility, and pilot study procedures is needed. In this pilot study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a large multicenter prospective cohort study.

METHODS

This feasibility study recruited adult patients admitted to the ICU with TBI and an abnormal cerebral CT scan. In all patients, we documented Richmond Agitation Sedation Score (RASS) and agitated behaviors every 8-h nursing shift using a dedicated tool documenting 14 behaviors. Our feasibility objectives were to obtain consent from at least 2 patients per month; completion of screening logs for agitated behaviors by bedside nurses for more than 90% of 8-h shifts; completion of data collection in an average of 6 h or less; and obtain 6-month follow-up for surviving patients. The main clinical outcome was the incidence of agitation and individual agitated behaviors.

RESULTS

In total, 47 eligible patients were approached for inclusion and 30 (64% consent rate) were recruited over a 10-month period (3 patients/month). In total, 794 out of 827 (96%) possible 8-h periods of agitated behavior logs were completed by bedside nurses, with a median of 24 observations (IQR 28.0) per patient. During the ICU stay, 17 of 30 patients developed agitation (56.7%; 95% CI 0.37-0.75) defined as RASS ≥ 2 during at least one observation period and for a median of 4 days (IQR 5.5). At 6 months post-TBI, among the 24 available patients, an unfavorable score (GOS-E < 5 including death) was reported in 12 patients (50%). In the 14 patients who were alive and available at 6 months, the median QOLIBRI score was 74.5 (IQR 18.5).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the feasibility of conducting a larger cohort study to evaluate the epidemiology and impact of agitated behaviors in critically ill TBI patients. This study also shows that agitated behaviors are frequent and are associated with adverse events.

摘要

背景

躁动行为在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后恢复的重症监护病房(ICU)患者中是个问题,因为它们给医护人员带来了重大风险和挑战。迄今为止,尚无评估其在ICU中的流行病学和影响的研究。在计划进行多中心研究之前,需要评估招募情况、可行性和预试验程序。在这项预试验研究中,我们旨在评估开展一项大型多中心前瞻性队列研究的可行性。

方法

这项可行性研究纳入了入住ICU且患有TBI且脑部CT扫描异常的成年患者。在所有患者中,我们使用专门记录14种行为的工具,每8小时护理轮班记录一次里士满躁动镇静评分(RASS)和躁动行为。我们的可行性目标是每月至少获得2名患者的同意;床边护士在超过90%的8小时轮班中完成躁动行为筛查日志;平均在6小时或更短时间内完成数据收集;并对存活患者进行6个月的随访。主要临床结局是躁动及个体躁动行为的发生率。

结果

在为期10个月的时间里(每月3名患者),总共邀请了47名符合条件的患者入组,30名患者(同意率64%)被招募。床边护士总共完成了827个可能的8小时躁动行为日志中的79  (96%),每位患者的观察次数中位数为24次(四分位间距28.0)。在ICU住院期间,30名患者中有17名出现躁动(56.7%;95%置信区间0.37 - 0.75),定义为在至少一个观察期内RASS≥2,中位数为4天(四分位间距5.5)。TBI后6个月,在24名可随访的患者中,12名患者(50%)报告了不良评分(扩展格拉斯哥预后量表<5,包括死亡)。在6个月时存活且可随访的14名患者中,QOLIBRI评分中位数为74.5(四分位间距18.5)。

结论

本研究证明了开展一项更大规模队列研究以评估重症TBI患者躁动行为的流行病学和影响的可行性。本研究还表明,躁动行为很常见,且与不良事件相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfe8/7731762/60c196dd4984/40814_2020_736_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验