Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Monash Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery Monash Health, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Jun;30(6):917-921. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
The use of rapid deployment sutureless aortic valve replacement (AVR) has become a viable alternative to conventional AVR especially in intermediate and high-risk patients. However, sutureless AVR has been associated with increased rates of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation compared with conventionally implanted aortic valve prostheses. The aim of this study was to determine predictive factors for complete heart block requiring insertion of a PPM post-AVR with a Perceval S sutureless valve (LivaNova, London, UK). Such knowledge will help to improve patient counselling, selection and management of patients undergoing sutureless AVR.
A retrospective cohort study assessed all patients who underwent insertion of the Perceval sutureless aortic valve prosthesis between July 2015 and September 2019. Medical records were reviewed for demographic, preoperative electrocardiograph (ECG), and operative features related to postoperative PPM implantation and follow-up in the electrophysiology clinic.
One hundred and thirty (130) patients without pre-existing PPM underwent sutureless AVR (66.9% male, average age 74.4±6.6 years). Fifty-seven (57) underwent concomitant cardiac surgical procedures. Eight (8) patients underwent redo cardiac surgery. Nineteen (19) of the 130 (14.6%) patients required insertion of a PPM during their postoperative course. Factors associated with PPM insertion were right bundle branch block (overall n=15, PPM vs No PPM: 8/19 vs 7/111 [42.1 % vs. 6.31 %; p<0.01]), longer QRS duration 113.32ms±22.24 ms vs 100.52±20.96 ms (p=0.017) and longer PR Interval 185.166±42.38 ms vs 169.23±25.70 ms (p=0.03).
Insertion of rapid deployment sutureless aortic valves in the setting of pre-existing right bundle branch block, prolonged QRS complex and longer PR intervals is associated with increased risk of postoperative PPM requirement. These factors should be considered when preoperatively counselling and postoperatively managing patients when balloon expandable sutureless valves are used.
快速部署无缝线主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的使用已成为传统 AVR 的可行替代方法,尤其是在中高危患者中。然而,与传统植入的主动脉瓣假体相比,无缝线 AVR 与永久性起搏器(PPM)植入率增加有关。本研究旨在确定使用 Perceval S 无缝线瓣膜(LivaNova,伦敦,英国)进行 AVR 后需要插入 PPM 的完全性心脏阻滞的预测因素。此类知识将有助于改善患者咨询、选择和管理接受无缝线 AVR 的患者。
回顾性队列研究评估了 2015 年 7 月至 2019 年 9 月期间接受 Perceval 无缝线主动脉瓣假体植入的所有患者。回顾了病历,以评估与术后 PPM 植入和电生理诊所随访相关的人口统计学、术前心电图(ECG)和手术特征。
130 名(66.9%为男性,平均年龄 74.4±6.6 岁)无预先存在的 PPM 的患者接受了无缝线 AVR。57 例患者同时接受了心脏外科手术。8 例患者接受了再次心脏手术。130 名患者中的 19 名(14.6%)在术后期间需要插入 PPM。与 PPM 插入相关的因素是右束支传导阻滞(整体 n=15,PPM 与无 PPM:8/19 与 7/111[42.1%与 6.31%;p<0.01])、更长的 QRS 持续时间 113.32ms±22.24 ms 与 100.52±20.96 ms(p=0.017)和更长的 PR 间隔 185.166±42.38 ms 与 169.23±25.70 ms(p=0.03)。
在存在先前存在的右束支传导阻滞、QRS 复合体延长和更长的 PR 间隔的情况下,植入快速部署的无缝线主动脉瓣与术后 PPM 需求增加相关。在使用球囊扩张无缝线瓣膜时,应在术前咨询和术后管理患者时考虑这些因素。