Program of Master and Doctoral Studies in Health Science, Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Brazil.
Tropical Medicine Institute of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Brazil; Hospital Giselda Trigueiro, Health Department of the State of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Acta Trop. 2021 Mar;215:105791. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105791. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
Leprosy causes a range of symptoms, and most diagnoses are established based on the clinical picture. Therefore, false negative and positive diagnoses are relatively common. We analyzed the spatial pattern of leprosy misdiagnosis and associated factors in Brazil.
Exploratory analyses of Kernel density of the new case detection rate (NCDR) and proportion of misdiagnosis in Brazil, 2003-2017. Factors associated with misdiagnosis were identified by logistic regression at the 5% significance level.
A total of 574,181 new leprosy cases were recorded in Brazil within the study period, of which 7,477 (1.3%) were misdiagnoses. No spatial correlation was observed between the proportion of misdiagnoses and the NCDR. The likelihood of misdiagnosis was elevated for females [OR: 1.58 (1.51-1.66)], children [OR: 1.49 (1.36-1.64)]; paucibacillary [OR: 1.08 (1.02-1.13)], indeterminate clinical forms [OR: 2.37 (2.15-2.62)], for cases diagnosed in the frame of mass screenings [OR: 3.36 (3.09- 3.73)] and contact examination [OR: 2.30 (2.13-2.49)] and for cases with affected nerves but no skin lesions [OR: 2.47 (2.19-2.77)] when compared with those presenting both skin lesion and affected nerves.
Misdiagnosis of leprosy is not correlated with the endemicity level in Brazil but rather with personal, diagnosis-related and disease characteristics.
麻风病可引起多种症状,大多数诊断是基于临床表现。因此,误诊和漏诊较为常见。我们分析了巴西麻风病误诊的空间模式及其相关因素。
对 2003-2017 年巴西新病例检出率(NCDR)和误诊率的核密度进行探索性分析。在 5%的显著性水平上,采用逻辑回归识别与误诊相关的因素。
在研究期间,巴西共记录了 574181 例新麻风病例,其中 7477 例(1.3%)为误诊。误诊率与 NCDR 之间无空间相关性。女性[比值比(OR):1.58(1.51-1.66)]、儿童[OR:1.49(1.36-1.64)]、少菌型[OR:1.08(1.02-1.13)]、不确定临床类型[OR:2.37(2.15-2.62)]、大规模筛查诊断[OR:3.36(3.09-3.73)]和接触检查[OR:2.30(2.13-2.49)]以及有神经受累但无皮肤损伤的病例[OR:2.47(2.19-2.77)],其误诊的可能性更高,与同时存在皮肤损伤和神经受累的病例相比。
巴西麻风病误诊与流行程度无关,而与个人、诊断相关和疾病特征有关。