Dewi Arlina, Nurmandi Achmad, Rochmawati Erna, Purnomo Eko Priyo, Dimas Rizqi Muhammad, Azzahra Abitassha, Benedictos Samantha, Suardi Wahdania, Tri Kusuma Dewi Dyah
Master of Hospital Administration, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Jusuf Kalla School of Government, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Health Promot Perspect. 2020 Nov 7;10(4):359-365. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2020.54. eCollection 2020.
Concern for the development of actions against COVID-19 has continued to grow since February 2020. Government responses remain a crucial part of preventing virus transmission through policy formulation and strengthening national capacity. This study has used quantitative analysis, using secondary data from 177 countries. The variables consist of Global Health Security (GHS) category and COVID-19 pandemic. An analysis of the appropriateness of the government's policy response in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic was carried out by comparing the two variables. The study indicated a significant relationship between global health security category and pandemic score (P < 0.01). There were 37 countries out of 177 (20.9%) categorized as under-reaction and least-reaction. Pandemic COVID-19 score, rated based on doubling time, is directly significant with the health security category. The government should improve its responsiveness and preparation to improve national capacity during the novel coronavirus pandemic.
自2020年2月以来,人们对针对新冠疫情采取行动的关注持续增加。政府的应对措施仍然是通过政策制定和加强国家能力来防止病毒传播的关键部分。本研究采用了定量分析方法,使用了来自177个国家的二手数据。变量包括全球卫生安全(GHS)类别和新冠疫情。通过比较这两个变量,对政府应对新冠疫情的政策措施的适宜性进行了分析。研究表明全球卫生安全类别与疫情得分之间存在显著关系(P < 0.01)。在177个国家中,有37个国家(20.9%)被归类为反应不足和最不反应。根据翻倍时间评定的新冠疫情得分与卫生安全类别直接相关。在新型冠状病毒疫情期间,政府应提高其反应能力和准备工作,以提高国家能力。