西非应对 COVID-19 大流行的政策措施:范围综述方案。

Policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in West Africa: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 10;13(12):e079810. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079810.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Four years after the devastating Ebola outbreak, governments in West Africa were quick to implement non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) in response to the rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2. The NPIs implemented included physical distancing, closure of schools and businesses, restrictions on public gatherings and mandating the use of face masks among others. In the absence of widely available vaccinations, NPIs were the only known means to try to slow the spread of COVID-19. While numerous studies have assessed the effectiveness of these NPIs in high-income countries, less is known about the processes that lead to the adoption of policies and the factors that influence their implementation and adherence in low-income and middle-income countries. The objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to the policy formulation, decision-making and implementation stages of NPIs in West Africa.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A scoping review will be undertaken following the guidance developed by Arskey and O'Malley, the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews and the PRISMA guidelines for Scoping Reviews. Both peer-reviewed and grey literature will be searched using Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, APA PsycInfo, WHO Institutional Repository for Information Sharing, JSTOR and Google Advanced Search, and by searching the websites of the WHO, and the West African Health Organisation. Screening will be conducted by two reviewers based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and data will be extracted, coded and narratively synthesised.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

We started this scoping review in May 2023, and anticipate finishing by April 2024. Ethics approval is not required since we are not collecting primary data. This protocol was registered at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/gvek2/). We plan to disseminate this research through publications, conference presentations and upcoming West African policy dialogues on pandemic preparedness and response.

摘要

简介

在毁灭性的埃博拉疫情爆发四年后,西非各国政府迅速采取非药物干预措施(NPIs)以应对 SARS-CoV-2 的迅速传播。实施的 NPI 包括保持社交距离、关闭学校和企业、限制公众集会以及强制使用口罩等。在广泛可用疫苗的情况下,NPIs 是减缓 COVID-19 传播的唯一已知方法。虽然许多研究评估了这些 NPI 在高收入国家的有效性,但对于导致政策采用的过程以及影响其在低收入和中等收入国家实施和遵守的因素知之甚少。本范围综述的目的是了解与西非 NPIs 的政策制定、决策和实施阶段相关的证据的程度和类型。

方法和分析

将按照 Arskey 和 O'Malley 的指导、乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)的范围综述方法和 PRISMA 指南进行范围综述。将使用 Web of Science、Embase、Scopus、APA PsycInfo、世界卫生组织信息共享机构知识库、JSTOR 和 Google 高级搜索以及世界卫生组织和西非卫生组织的网站搜索同行评审和灰色文献。根据纳入和排除标准,由两名评审员进行筛选,提取、编码和叙述性综合数据。

伦理和传播

我们于 2023 年 5 月开始进行这项范围综述,预计在 2024 年 4 月完成。由于我们不收集原始数据,因此不需要伦理批准。本方案已在开放科学框架(https://osf.io/gvek2/)上注册。我们计划通过出版物、会议演讲和即将举行的关于大流行病防范和应对的西非政策对话来传播这项研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索