Suppr超能文献

在英国国民保健署糖尿病预防计划中进行即时 HbA1c 检测的经验:一项观察性研究。

Experience of point-of-care HbA1c testing in the English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme: an observational study.

机构信息

Public Health England, London, UK

Division of Metabolism, Digestion & Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Dec;8(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001703.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To report the observations of point-of-care (POC) glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) testing in people with non-diabetic hyperglycemia (NDH; HbA1c 42-47 mmol/mol (6.0%-6.4%)), applied in community settings, within the English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS DPP).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A service evaluation assessing prospectively collected national service-level data from the NHS DPP, using data from the first referral received in June 2016-October 2018. Individuals were referred to the NHS DPP with a laboratory-measured HbA1c in the NDH range and had a repeat HbA1c measured at first attendance of the program using one of three POC devices: DCA Vantage, Afinion or A1C Now+. Differences between the referral and POC HbA1c and the SD of the POC HbA1c were calculated. The factors associated with the difference in HbA1c and the association between POC HbA1c result and subsequent attendance of the NHS DPP were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Data from 73 703 participants demonstrated a significant mean difference between the referral and POC HbA1c of -2.48 mmol/mol (-0.23%) (t=157, p<0.001) with significant differences in the mean difference between devices (F(2, 73 700)=738, p<0.001). The SD of POC HbA1c was 4.46 mmol/mol (0.41%) with significant differences in SDs between devices (F(2, 73 700)=1542, p<0.001). Participants who were older, from more deprived areas and from Asian, black and mixed ethnic groups were associated with smaller HbA1c differences. Normoglycemic POC HbA1c versus NDH POC HbA1c values were associated with lower subsequent attendance at behavioral interventions (58% vs 67%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

POC HbA1c testing in community settings was associated with significantly lower HbA1c values when compared with laboratory-measured referrals. Acknowledging effects of regression to the mean, we found that these differences were also associated with POC method, location, individual patient factors and time between measurements. Compared with POC HbA1c values in the NDH range, normoglycemic POC HbA1c values were associated with lower subsequent intervention attendance.

摘要

简介

报告在社区环境中应用于非糖尿病性高血糖(NDH;HbA1c 42-47mmol/mol(6.0%-6.4%))人群中的即时检测(POC)糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测的观察结果,这是在英国国家卫生服务糖尿病预防计划(NHS DPP)中进行的。

研究设计和方法

这是一项服务评估,前瞻性地评估了 NHS DPP 从 2016 年 6 月至 2018 年 10 月期间收集的全国服务水平数据,使用的是 NHS DPP 首次就诊时收到的实验室测量 HbA1c 在 NDH 范围内的个体数据。使用三种 POC 设备中的一种(DCA Vantage、Afinion 或 A1C Now+)对 NHS DPP 进行了再次测量,这些设备分别为 DCA Vantage、Afinion 和 A1C Now+。计算了转诊和 POC HbA1c 之间的差异以及 POC HbA1c 的标准差。还评估了与 HbA1c 差异相关的因素以及 POC HbA1c 结果与 NHS DPP 后续就诊之间的关联。

结果

来自 73703 名参与者的数据显示,转诊和 POC HbA1c 之间存在显著的平均差异,为-2.48mmol/mol(-0.23%)(t=157,p<0.001),且设备之间的平均差异存在显著差异(F(2,73700)=738,p<0.001)。POC HbA1c 的标准差为 4.46mmol/mol(0.41%),设备之间的标准差存在显著差异(F(2,73700)=1542,p<0.001)。年龄较大、来自较贫困地区以及来自亚洲、黑人和混合种族群体的参与者与 HbA1c 差异较小相关。与 NDH 范围内的正常 POC HbA1c 相比,正常 POC HbA1c 与较低的后续干预就诊率相关(58% vs 67%,p<0.001)。

结论

与实验室测量的转诊相比,在社区环境中进行 POC HbA1c 检测与 HbA1c 值显著降低相关。在承认回归均值的影响后,我们发现这些差异也与 POC 方法、地点、个体患者因素和测量之间的时间有关。与 NDH 范围内的 POC HbA1c 值相比,正常 POC HbA1c 值与较低的后续干预就诊率相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d8c/7737024/9aba12b40768/bmjdrc-2020-001703f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验