Suppr超能文献

利用分子条码和深度微生物组分析研究台湾的海鲜替代问题及后果。

Investigating seafood substitution problems and consequences in Taiwan using molecular barcoding and deep microbiome profiling.

机构信息

Institute of Food Safety and Health Risk Assessment, National Yang-Ming University, No. 155, Section 2, Linong St, Beitou District, Taipei City, 112, Taiwan.

Department of Health, Taipei City Government, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 15;10(1):21997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79070-y.

Abstract

Seafood is commonly seen in cuisines of the Asia-Pacific regions. The rates and consequences of seafood substitution frauds in Taiwan were elusive. To address this, we conducted a consumer-centered study, collecting seafood dishes and cooking materials from restaurants and markets easily accessible to the residents in Taiwan. Seafood substitutions were evaluated using DNA barcodes in the mitochondrial MT-CO1 gene. Among the 127 samples collected, 24 samples were mislabeled (18.9%, 95% Confidence interval [CI] = [12.5-26.8%]). The mislabel rates vary in different fish and product types (snapper [84.6%, 54.6-98.1%], cod [25%, 5.5-57.2%], swordfish [16.7%, 2.1-48.4%], cobia [16.7%, 0.4-64.1%], surimi products [100.0%]). A deep microbiome profiling was performed in 8 correctly-labeled conventional sushi and 2 tilapia sashimi mislabeled as snapper, with sequencing depths greater than 100,000 reads for every sample. The relative abundance of Pseudomonas genus is significantly higher in tilapia sashimi than in conventional sushi (P = 0.044). In conclusion, the gross seafood mislabel rate in Taiwan is 18.9% (12.5-26.8%). Snapper, cod and surimi products are particularly vulnerable to fraudulent substitutions. The high abundance of Pseudomonas in tilapia sashimi mislabeled as snapper unveils a potential health issue pertaining to the consumption of raw mislabeled seafood.

摘要

海鲜在亚太地区的菜肴中很常见。在台湾,海鲜替代欺诈的比率和后果难以捉摸。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了一项以消费者为中心的研究,从台湾居民容易接触到的餐厅和市场收集海鲜菜肴和烹饪材料。使用线粒体 MT-CO1 基因中的 DNA 条码评估海鲜替代品。在所收集的 127 个样本中,有 24 个样本被误贴标签(18.9%,95%置信区间 [CI] = [12.5-26.8%])。不同鱼类和产品类型的误贴标签率不同(笛鲷 [84.6%,54.6-98.1%]、鳕鱼 [25%,5.5-57.2%]、箭鱼 [16.7%,2.1-48.4%]、军曹鱼 [16.7%,0.4-64.1%]、鱼糜产品 [100.0%])。对 8 个正确标记的传统寿司和 2 个被误标记为笛鲷的罗非鱼生鱼片进行了深度微生物组分析,每个样本的测序深度大于 100,000 次。假单胞菌属的相对丰度在罗非鱼生鱼片显著高于传统寿司(P = 0.044)。总之,台湾海鲜的总误贴标签率为 18.9%(12.5-26.8%)。笛鲷、鳕鱼和鱼糜产品特别容易受到欺诈性替代。在被误标记为笛鲷的罗非鱼生鱼片样本中假单胞菌属的高丰度揭示了与食用生的误贴标签海鲜相关的潜在健康问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0fa/7738519/c537a38f44bd/41598_2020_79070_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验