Blythe Joseph S, Peerdeman Kaya J, Veldhuijzen Dieuwke S, van Schothorst Myrthe M E, Thomaïdou Mia A, van Laarhoven Antoinette I M, Evers Andrea W M
Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, NL-2333AK Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail:
Acta Derm Venereol. 2021 Jan 13;101(1):adv00370. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3723.
To investigate learning processes underlying nocebo effects on itch, this study measured the efficacy of classical conditioning and observational learning for inducing nocebo effects on cowhage-evoked itch and scratching behaviour. A total of 58 healthy female participants were assigned to classical conditioning, observational learning, or sham conditioning groups. In the classical conditioning group, experimenters associated the application of an inert gel with increased itch intensity themselves. In the observational learning group, a video of the conditioning paradigm was shown. Nocebo effects were measured as the difference in itch or scratching between control and nocebo test phase trials, compared between learning and control groups. Compared with sham conditioning, classical conditioning induced a significant nocebo effect on itch, while observational learning did not. No nocebo effect on scratching was detected. These results highlight the role that learning through direct experiences plays in pruritic symptoms. Future research should investigate how a patient's history of unsuccessful treatments shapes treatment outcomes.
为了研究安慰剂反效应对瘙痒产生影响的潜在学习过程,本研究测量了经典条件反射和观察性学习对诱导安慰剂反效应对洋麻诱发的瘙痒和抓挠行为的影响。总共58名健康女性参与者被分配到经典条件反射组、观察性学习组或假条件反射组。在经典条件反射组中,实验者将惰性凝胶的涂抹与自身瘙痒强度的增加联系起来。在观察性学习组中,展示了条件反射范式的视频。安慰剂反效应通过学习组和对照组之间,对照试验阶段和安慰剂测试阶段试验之间瘙痒或抓挠的差异来衡量。与假条件反射相比,经典条件反射对瘙痒产生了显著的安慰剂反效应,而观察性学习则没有。未检测到对抓挠的安慰剂反效应。这些结果突出了通过直接体验进行学习在瘙痒症状中所起的作用。未来的研究应该调查患者不成功的治疗史如何影响治疗结果。