Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Department of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Mar 1;758:143698. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143698. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
We conducted an emission measurement campaign as a part of a multiyear cookstove intervention trial in two rural locations in northern and southern India. 253 uncontrolled cooking tests measured emissions in control and intervention households during three ~3-month-long measurement periods in each location. We measured pollutants including fine particulate matter (PM), organic and elemental carbon (OC, EC), black carbon (BC) and carbon monoxide (CO) from stoves ranging from traditional solid fuel (TSF) to improved biomass stoves (rocket, gasifier) to liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) models. TSF stoves showed substantial variability in pollutant emission factors (EFs; g kg wood) and optical properties across measurement periods. Multilinear regression modeling found that measurement period, fuel properties, relative humidity, and cooking duration are significant predictors of TSF EFs. A rocket stove showed moderate reductions relative to TSF. LPG stoves had the lowest pollutant EFs, with mean PM and CO EFs (g MJ) >90% lower than biomass stoves. However, in-home EFs of LPG were substantially higher than lab EFs, likely influenced by non-ideal combustion performance, emissions from food and possible influence from other combustion sources. In-home emission measurements may depict the actual exposure benefits associated with dissemination of LPG stoves in real world interventions.
我们进行了一次排放测量活动,作为在印度北部和南部两个农村地区进行的多年炉灶干预试验的一部分。在每个地点的三个为期约 3 个月的测量期内,对 253 次不受控制的烹饪测试进行了测量,以比较对照户和干预户的排放情况。我们测量了来自传统固体燃料(TSF)炉灶、改良生物质炉灶(火箭炉、气化炉)到液化石油气(LPG)模型的污染物,包括细颗粒物(PM)、有机和元素碳(OC、EC)、黑碳(BC)和一氧化碳(CO)。TSF 炉灶在不同的测量期之间显示出污染物排放因子(EF;g kg 木材)和光学特性的显著变化。多元线性回归模型发现,测量期、燃料特性、相对湿度和烹饪时间是 TSF EF 的重要预测因子。与 TSF 相比,火箭炉显示出适度的减排效果。LPG 炉灶的污染物 EF 最低,其 PM 和 CO EF(g MJ)比生物质炉灶低 90%以上。然而,LPG 的室内 EF 远远高于实验室 EF,可能是由于非理想的燃烧性能、食物排放以及可能受到其他燃烧源的影响。室内排放测量可能描绘了与现实世界干预中推广 LPG 炉灶相关的实际暴露效益。