• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声辅助伤口清创术(UAW)与标准伤口治疗对复杂糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)的细胞增殖、真皮修复及微生物学效果:一项开放标签随机对照试验

Cellular Proliferation, Dermal Repair, and Microbiological Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Assisted Wound Debridement (UAW) Versus Standard Wound Treatment in Complicated Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFU): An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Lázaro-Martínez José Luis, Álvaro-Afonso Francisco Javier, Sevillano-Fernández David, García-Álvarez Yolanda, Sanz-Corbalan Irene, García-Morales Esther

机构信息

Diabetic Foot Unit, Clínica Universitaria de Podología, Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 13;9(12):4032. doi: 10.3390/jcm9124032.

DOI:10.3390/jcm9124032
PMID:33322200
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7763691/
Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the effects of ultrasound-assisted wound (UAW) debridement on cellular proliferation and dermal repair in complicated diabetic foot ulcers as compared to diabetic foot ulcers receiving surgical/sharp wound debridement. A randomized controlled trial was performed involving 51 outpatients with complicated diabetic foot ulcers that either received surgical debridement ( = 24) or UAW debridement ( = 27) every week during a six-week treatment period. Compared to patients receiving surgical debridement, patients treated with UAW debridement exhibited significantly improved cellular proliferation, as determined by CD31 staining, Masson's trichrome staining, and actin staining. Bacterial loads were significantly reduced in the UAW debridement group compared to the surgical group (UAW group 4.27 ± 0.37 day 0 to 2.11 ± 0.8 versus surgical group 4.66 ± 1.21 day 0 to 4.39 ± 1.24 day 42; = 0.01). Time to healing was also significantly lower ( = 0.04) in the UAW group (9.7 ± 3.8 weeks) compared to the surgical group (14.8 ± 12.3 weeks), but both groups had similar rates of patients that were healed after six months of follow-up (23 patients (85.1%) in the UAW group vs. 20 patients (83.3%) in the surgical group; = 0.856). We propose that UAW debridement could be an effective alternative when surgical debridement is not available or is contraindicated for use on patients with complicated diabetic foot ulcers.

摘要

我们旨在评估超声辅助伤口清创术(UAW)对复杂糖尿病足溃疡细胞增殖和真皮修复的影响,并与接受手术/锐器伤口清创术的糖尿病足溃疡进行比较。进行了一项随机对照试验,纳入51例患有复杂糖尿病足溃疡的门诊患者,在为期六周的治疗期间,这些患者每周接受手术清创术(n = 24)或UAW清创术(n = 27)。与接受手术清创术的患者相比,经UAW清创术治疗的患者通过CD31染色、Masson三色染色和肌动蛋白染色测定,细胞增殖显著改善。与手术组相比,UAW清创术组的细菌载量显著降低(UAW组:第0天4.27±0.37至第42天2.11±0.8;手术组:第0天4.66±1.21至第42天4.39±1.24;P = 0.01)。UAW组的愈合时间也显著低于手术组(P = 0.04)(UAW组为9.7±3.8周,手术组为14.8±12.3周),但两组在随访六个月后愈合的患者比例相似(UAW组23例患者(85.1%),手术组20例患者(83.3%);P = 0.856)。我们认为,当手术清创不可行或对患有复杂糖尿病足溃疡的患者使用有禁忌时,UAW清创术可能是一种有效的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a9/7763691/ffa738949f61/jcm-09-04032-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a9/7763691/1e1783387772/jcm-09-04032-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a9/7763691/3473d6cde462/jcm-09-04032-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a9/7763691/2fb68ab11ee6/jcm-09-04032-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a9/7763691/817b5d93a0e0/jcm-09-04032-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a9/7763691/0efc09467128/jcm-09-04032-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a9/7763691/ffa738949f61/jcm-09-04032-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a9/7763691/1e1783387772/jcm-09-04032-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a9/7763691/3473d6cde462/jcm-09-04032-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a9/7763691/2fb68ab11ee6/jcm-09-04032-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a9/7763691/817b5d93a0e0/jcm-09-04032-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a9/7763691/0efc09467128/jcm-09-04032-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6a9/7763691/ffa738949f61/jcm-09-04032-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Cellular Proliferation, Dermal Repair, and Microbiological Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Assisted Wound Debridement (UAW) Versus Standard Wound Treatment in Complicated Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFU): An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.超声辅助伤口清创术(UAW)与标准伤口治疗对复杂糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)的细胞增殖、真皮修复及微生物学效果:一项开放标签随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 13;9(12):4032. doi: 10.3390/jcm9124032.
2
Ultrasound-Assisted Wound (UAW) Debridement in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.超声辅助伤口清创术治疗糖尿病足溃疡:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 30;11(7):1911. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071911.
3
Ultrasound-assisted debridement of neuroischaemic diabetic foot ulcers, clinical and microbiological effects: a case series.超声辅助清创治疗神经缺血性糖尿病足溃疡的临床及微生物学效果:病例系列研究
J Wound Care. 2018 May 2;27(5):278-286. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.5.278.
4
Low-frequency ultrasound debridement in patients with diabetic foot ulcers and osteomyelitis.糖尿病足溃疡合并骨髓炎患者的低频超声清创术
Wounds. 2013 Jul;25(7):193-8.
5
Topical Administration of Accelerates the Healing of Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers through Modifications of Infection, Angiogenesis, Macrophage Phenotype and Neutrophil Response.局部给药通过改变感染、血管生成、巨噬细胞表型和中性粒细胞反应加速慢性糖尿病足溃疡的愈合。
Microorganisms. 2022 Mar 17;10(3):634. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10030634.
6
The value of debridement and Vacuum-Assisted Closure (V.A.C.) Therapy in diabetic foot ulcers.清创术与负压封闭引流(V.A.C.)疗法在糖尿病足溃疡中的价值。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008 May-Jun;24 Suppl 1:S76-80. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.852.
7
Cost-effectiveness of clostridial collagenase ointment on wound closure in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: economic analysis of results from a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial.胶原酶制剂治疗糖尿病足溃疡患者伤口闭合的成本效果分析:多中心、随机、开放标签试验结果的经济学分析。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2015 Feb 28;8:7. doi: 10.1186/s13047-015-0065-x. eCollection 2015.
8
Primary wound closure of diabetic foot ulcers by debridement and stitching.通过清创和缝合对糖尿病足溃疡进行一期伤口闭合。
J Wound Care. 2016 Nov 2;25(11):650-654. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.11.650.
9
A multicentre prospective randomised controlled comparative parallel study of dehydrated human umbilical cord (EpiCord) allograft for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.一项关于脱水人脐带(EpiCord)同种异体移植物治疗糖尿病足溃疡的多中心前瞻性随机对照对比平行研究。
Int Wound J. 2019 Feb;16(1):122-130. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13001. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
10
Comparisons of negative pressure wound therapy and ultrasonic debridement for diabetic foot ulcers: a network meta-analysis.负压伤口治疗与超声清创治疗糖尿病足溃疡的比较:一项网状Meta分析。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Aug 15;8(8):12548-56. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy of 12 interventions in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a network meta-analysis.12种干预措施治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效比较:一项网状Meta分析
PeerJ. 2025 Aug 11;13:e19809. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19809. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating the effectiveness of ultrasound-assisted wound debridement in managing diabetic foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.评估超声辅助清创术治疗糖尿病足溃疡的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Diabetes. 2025 Feb 15;16(2):97077. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i2.97077.
3
Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-assisted wound debridement in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines on use of interventions to enhance healing of chronic foot ulcers in diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update).糖尿病慢性足部溃疡干预措施应用指南(国际糖尿病足工作组 2019 年更新版)。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Mar;36 Suppl 1:e3283. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3283.
2
Practical Guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease (IWGDF 2019 update).《糖尿病足病预防与管理实用指南(IWGDF 2019 更新版)》
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Mar;36 Suppl 1:e3266. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3266.
3
Guidelines on offloading foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update).
超声辅助清创术治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效和安全性:11 项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 May 1;15:1393251. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1393251. eCollection 2024.
4
Comparison of healing effectiveness of different debridement approaches for diabetic foot ulcers: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.不同清创方法治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 11;11:1271706. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1271706. eCollection 2023.
5
Electromechanical therapy in diabetic foot ulcers patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病足溃疡患者的机电疗法:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2023 Jun 8;22(2):967-984. doi: 10.1007/s40200-023-01240-2. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Diabetic foot wound ulcer management by laser therapy: A meta-analysis.激光疗法治疗糖尿病足创面溃疡:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Dec;20(10):4208-4216. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14320. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
7
Effect of ultrasound-supported wound debridement in subjects with diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis.超声辅助清创术治疗糖尿病足溃疡的效果:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Sep;20(7):2618-2625. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14133. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
8
A Sustainable Solution to Skin Diseases: Ecofriendly Transdermal Patches.皮肤病的可持续解决方案:环保型透皮贴剂
Pharmaceutics. 2023 Feb 8;15(2):579. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020579.
9
A scientometrics analysis and visualisation of diabetic foot research from 1955 to 2022.1955 年至 2022 年糖尿病足研究的科学计量学分析与可视化。
Int Wound J. 2023 Apr;20(4):1072-1087. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13964. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
10
The efficacy of low-frequency ultrasound as an added treatment for chronic wounds: A meta-analysis.低频超声作为慢性伤口附加治疗的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Feb;20(2):448-457. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13893. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
糖尿病患者足部溃疡减压治疗指南(IWGDF 2019 更新版)。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Mar;36 Suppl 1:e3274. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3274.
4
Ultrasonic-assisted wound debridement: report from a closed panel meeting.超声辅助伤口清创术:封闭小组会议报告
J Wound Care. 2020 Feb 2;29(2):128-135. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.2.128.
5
Guidelines on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of peripheral artery disease in patients with foot ulcers and diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update).糖尿病足溃疡患者外周动脉疾病的诊断、预后和管理指南(国际糖尿病足工作组 2019 年更新)。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Mar;36 Suppl 1:e3276. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3276. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
6
Preliminary experience of an expert panel using Triangle Wound Assessment for the evaluation of chronic wounds.一个专家小组运用三角伤口评估法评估慢性伤口的初步经验。
J Wound Care. 2018 Nov 2;27(11):790-796. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.11.790.
7
Correlation between Empirical Antibiotic Therapy and Bone Culture Results in Patients with Osteomyelitis.骨髓炎患者经验性抗生素治疗与骨培养结果的相关性
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2019 Jan;32(1):41-44. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000542527.48815.1f.
8
Healing rates in diabetes-related foot ulcers using low frequency ultrasonic debridement versus non-surgical sharps debridement: a randomised controlled trial.使用低频超声清创术与非手术锐器清创术治疗糖尿病相关足部溃疡的愈合率:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Oct 16;11(1):732. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3841-4.
9
A Systematic Review to Compare the Effect of Low-frequency Ultrasonic Versus Nonsurgical Sharp Debridement on the Healing Rate of Chronic Diabetes-related Foot Ulcers.一项比较低频超声与非手术锐性清创术对慢性糖尿病相关足部溃疡愈合率影响的系统评价
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2018 Sep;64(9):39-46.
10
Ultrasound-assisted debridement of neuroischaemic diabetic foot ulcers, clinical and microbiological effects: a case series.超声辅助清创治疗神经缺血性糖尿病足溃疡的临床及微生物学效果:病例系列研究
J Wound Care. 2018 May 2;27(5):278-286. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.5.278.