Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Jun 1;190(6):977-979. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa271.
Interpreting the results of epidemiologic studies calls for objectivity and rigorous scrutiny, acknowledging the limitations that temper the applicability of the findings to public health action. Current trends have posed new challenges to balancing goals of scientific objectivity and validity with public health applications. The ongoing tension between epidemiology's aspirations and capability has several sources: the need to overpromise in research proposals, compromising methodological rigor because of public health importance, defending findings in the face of hostile critics, and appealing to core constituencies who have specific expectations from the research.
解释流行病学研究结果需要客观和严格审查,承认这些发现对公共卫生行动的适用性受到限制。当前的趋势给平衡科学客观性和有效性与公共卫生应用目标带来了新的挑战。流行病学的愿望和能力之间存在几种紧张关系:需要在研究提案中过度承诺,因为公共卫生的重要性而损害方法学的严谨性,面对敌对的批评者为研究结果辩护,以及呼吁核心群体,他们对研究有具体的期望。