Caplan-Cotenoff S A
Am J Law Med. 1987;13(1):71-104.
Working women are without substantial protection from the ramifications of pregnancy discrimination, and the opportunities for working men to take leave from work to participate in child care are limited. Recently, private businesses have begun implementing maternity or parental leave policies to address these problems. These policies are inconsistent, however, and a national parental leave program is needed to help women attain equal access to jobs and to provide men with the opportunity to participate in child care. This Note examines the historical background of pregnancy discrimination litigation and legislation, and highlights the gaps in the protection currently afforded women. It suggests that a federal parental leave policy may expand the scope of this protection, and attempts to gain insight and draw conclusions from analogous parental leave programs in foreign countries which may be used as models for a national program in the U.S. Such a program would benefit parents, children, and society by removing some of the obstacles to sexual equality.
职业女性在应对怀孕歧视的后果方面缺乏实质性保护,而职业男性请假参与育儿的机会也有限。最近,私营企业已开始实施产假或陪产假政策来解决这些问题。然而,这些政策并不统一,因此需要一个全国性的陪产假计划,以帮助女性平等获得工作机会,并为男性提供参与育儿的机会。本评论审视了怀孕歧视诉讼和立法的历史背景,并突出了目前给予女性的保护方面存在的差距。它表明,联邦陪产假政策可能会扩大这种保护的范围,并试图从国外类似的陪产假计划中获得见解并得出结论,这些计划可作为美国全国性计划的范例。这样一个计划将消除性别平等的一些障碍,从而使父母、儿童和社会都受益。