• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利益相关者框架的前提条件:数字产业中的消费者权益倡导和健康保护。

Prerequisites for stakeholder framework: Consumer advocacy and health protection in the digital industry. •

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, South Korea.

出版信息

J Behav Addict. 2020 Dec 16;9(4):898-902. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00095.

DOI:10.1556/2006.2020.00095
PMID:33325840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8969714/
Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) included gaming disorders in International Classification of Disease-11th (ICD-11) on May 25, 2019. Since then, some academics and the gaming industry have continued to argue over the health system's response to online addictive behaviors. Under these circumstances, a framework involving groups representing various interests is needed to derive a reasonable solution to the dispute over the inclusion of gaming disorders in ICD-11. For this framework to work effectively, it is necessary to agree on consistent and advanced research findings that harms related to the excessive use of digital devices or content continue to occur empirically all over the world and that addictive use constitutes a primary addictive disorder. The problematic risk taking involving emerging technologies may include not only health risks from addictive use, but also more general harms associated with digital ethics and norms such as privacy and transparent money transactions. An understanding of a public health model of addiction is required to reduce harms associated with online addictive behavior that exist behind risk taking. Such harms are also mediated by excessive use, excessive money spending, and exposure to addictive content such as violence and pornography. Major stakeholders and their roles can be derived more effectively based on these conceptual models and parameters of harms. In conclusion, the context of the proposed stakeholder framework should be further optimized on the basis of two principles: (1) advocating consumer rights as a general and standard approach to digital products; and (2) protecting consumers' health from harms related to addictive behaviors.

摘要

世界卫生组织(WHO)于 2019 年 5 月 25 日将游戏障碍纳入国际疾病分类第 11 版(ICD-11)。此后,一些学者和游戏行业继续就健康系统对在线成瘾行为的反应展开争论。在这种情况下,需要一个涉及代表各种利益群体的框架,以得出 ICD-11 中纳入游戏障碍争议的合理解决方案。为了使该框架有效运作,有必要就相关研究结果达成一致意见,这些研究结果表明,与过度使用数字设备或内容相关的伤害继续在全世界范围内发生,并且成瘾性使用构成了主要的成瘾障碍。新兴技术涉及的有问题的冒险行为不仅可能包括成瘾性使用带来的健康风险,还可能包括与数字伦理和规范相关的更普遍的伤害,如隐私和透明的货币交易。需要了解成瘾的公共卫生模型,以减少与冒险行为背后的在线成瘾行为相关的伤害。这些伤害还通过过度使用、过度花钱以及接触暴力和色情等成瘾内容而加剧。基于这些概念模型和伤害参数,可以更有效地确定主要利益相关者及其角色。总之,应该基于以下两个原则进一步优化拟议的利益相关者框架的背景:(1)倡导消费者权利,作为数字产品的一般和标准方法;(2)保护消费者的健康免受与成瘾行为相关的伤害。

相似文献

1
Prerequisites for stakeholder framework: Consumer advocacy and health protection in the digital industry. •利益相关者框架的前提条件:数字产业中的消费者权益倡导和健康保护。
J Behav Addict. 2020 Dec 16;9(4):898-902. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00095.
2
Inclusion of Gaming Disorder in ICD has more advantages than disadvantages.将“游戏障碍”纳入 ICD 具有更多的优势而非劣势。
J Behav Addict. 2017 Sep 1;6(3):280-284. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.046. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
3
Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11: The need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective.将游戏障碍纳入 ICD-11:从临床和公共卫生角度看这样做的必要性。
J Behav Addict. 2018 Sep 1;7(3):556-561. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.59. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
4
Functional impairment matters in the screening and diagnosis of gaming disorder.在游戏障碍的筛查和诊断中,功能障碍很重要。
J Behav Addict. 2017 Sep 1;6(3):285-289. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.036. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
5
Does the gaming disorder as listed in ICD-11 include "the observers"?《国际疾病分类第11版》中列出的游戏障碍是否包括“旁观者”?
Asian J Psychiatr. 2023 Feb;80:103365. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103365. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
6
Inclusion of gaming disorder criteria in ICD-11: A clinical perspective in favor.将游戏障碍标准纳入 ICD-11:支持的临床观点。
J Behav Addict. 2017 Sep 1;6(3):293-295. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.049. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
7
Both sides of the story: Addiction is not a pastime activity.故事的两面:成瘾不是一种消遣活动。
J Behav Addict. 2017 Jun 1;6(2):118-120. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.038.
8
Problematic gaming exists and is an example of disordered gaming.存在问题性游戏,这是一种游戏障碍的表现。
J Behav Addict. 2017 Sep 1;6(3):296-301. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.037. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
9
Expert appraisal of criteria for assessing gaming disorder: an international Delphi study.评估游戏障碍标准的专家评估:一项国际 Delphi 研究。
Addiction. 2021 Sep;116(9):2463-2475. doi: 10.1111/add.15411. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
10
From Pong to Pokemon Go, catching the essence of the Internet Gaming Disorder diagnosis.从《乒乓球》到《精灵宝可梦 Go》,捕捉网络成瘾诊断的本质。
J Behav Addict. 2017 Jun 1;6(2):124-127. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.010. Epub 2017 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Should Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS) Be Considered an Umbrella Disorder for Mental Illness and Associated Genetic and Epigenetic Induced Dysregulation of Brain Reward Circuitry?奖励缺陷综合征(RDS)是否应被视为精神疾病以及相关基因和表观遗传诱导的脑奖励回路失调的一种综合性病症?
J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 14;12(10):1719. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101719.

本文引用的文献

1
Can #PlayOurpartTogether help prevent miscommunication?“#共同发挥我们的作用”能否有助于防止沟通不畅?
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Aug;52:102123. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102123. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
2
Shared gray matter alterations in individuals with diverse behavioral addictions: A voxel-wise meta-analysis.具有不同行为成瘾个体的共享灰质改变:基于体素的荟萃分析。
J Behav Addict. 2020 Apr 1;9(1):44-57. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00006.
3
A public health advocacy approach for preventing and reducing gambling related harm.一种预防和减少赌博相关危害的公共卫生倡导方法。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2020 Feb;44(1):14-19. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12949. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
4
Problematic risk-taking involving emerging technologies: A stakeholder framework to minimize harms.新兴技术相关的冒险行为问题:一个将危害最小化的利益相关者框架。
J Behav Addict. 2021 Jan 15;9(4):869-875. doi: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.52.
5
Clinical Characteristics of Diagnosis for Internet Gaming Disorder: Comparison of DSM-5 IGD and ICD-11 GD Diagnosis.网络游戏障碍的诊断临床特征:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版网络游戏障碍与《国际疾病分类》第11版游戏障碍诊断的比较
J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 28;8(7):945. doi: 10.3390/jcm8070945.
6
Problem Gambling and Psychiatric Comorbidity-Risk and Temporal Sequencing Among Women and Men: Results from the Swelogs Case-Control Study.赌博问题与精神共病:女性和男性中的风险和时间顺序:来自 Swelogs 病例对照研究的结果。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Sep;35(3):757-771. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09851-2.
7
The Same or Different? Convergence of Skin Gambling and Other Gambling Among Children.相同还是不同?儿童皮肤赌博与其他赌博的趋同。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Dec;35(4):1109-1125. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09840-5.
8
Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11: The need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective.将游戏障碍纳入 ICD-11:从临床和公共卫生角度看这样做的必要性。
J Behav Addict. 2018 Sep 1;7(3):556-561. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.59. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
9
Comment on the global gaming industry's statement on ICD-11 gaming disorder: a corporate strategy to disregard harm and deflect social responsibility?评全球游戏行业关于《国际疾病分类第11版》中游戏障碍的声明:一项无视危害并推卸社会责任的企业策略?
Addiction. 2018 Nov;113(11):2145-2146. doi: 10.1111/add.14388. Epub 2018 Aug 5.
10
Alcohol industry involvement in science: A systematic review of the perspectives of the alcohol research community.酒精行业对科学的介入:酒精研究界观点的系统综述。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Jul;37(5):565-579. doi: 10.1111/dar.12826. Epub 2018 Jun 13.