Aroda Vanita R, Christophi Costas A, Edelstein Sharon L, Perreault Leigh, Kim Catherine, Golden Sherita H, Horton Edward, Mather Kieren J
MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Dec;8(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001841.
Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) levels are reported to be inversely associated with diabetes risk. It is unknown whether diabetes prevention interventions increase SHBG and whether resultant changes in SHBG affect diabetes risk. The purpose of this analysis was to determine whether intensive lifestyle intervention (ILS) or metformin changed circulating SHBG and if resultant changes influenced diabetes risk in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP).
This is a secondary analysis from the DPP (1996-2001), a randomized trial of ILS or metformin versus placebo on diabetes risk over a mean follow-up of 3.2 years. The DPP was conducted across 27 academic study centers in the USA. Men, premenopausal and postmenopausal women without hormone use in the DPP were evaluated. The DPP included overweight/obese persons with elevated fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance. Main outcomes measures were changes in SHBG levels at 1 year and risk of diabetes over 3 years.
ILS resulted in significantly higher increases (postmenopausal women: p<0.01) or smaller decrements (men: p<0.05; premenopausal women: p<0.01) in SHBG compared with placebo or metformin. Changes in SHBG were primarily attributable to changes in adiposity. There were no consistent associations of change in SHBG with the risk of diabetes by treatment arm or participant group.
Lifestyle intervention may be associated with favorable changes in circulating SHBG, which is largely due to changes in adiposity. Changes in circulating SHBG do not independently predict reductions in diabetes incidence.
据报道,性激素结合球蛋白(SHBG)水平与糖尿病风险呈负相关。尚不清楚糖尿病预防干预措施是否会提高SHBG水平,以及SHBG的相应变化是否会影响糖尿病风险。本分析的目的是确定强化生活方式干预(ILS)或二甲双胍是否会改变循环中的SHBG水平,以及由此产生的变化是否会影响糖尿病预防计划(DPP)中的糖尿病风险。
这是一项对DPP(1996 - 2001年)的二次分析,DPP是一项随机试验,比较了ILS或二甲双胍与安慰剂在平均3.2年随访期内对糖尿病风险的影响。该试验在美国27个学术研究中心进行。对DPP中未使用激素的男性、绝经前和绝经后女性进行了评估。DPP纳入了空腹血糖升高和糖耐量受损的超重/肥胖人群。主要结局指标为1年时SHBG水平的变化以及3年内糖尿病的风险。
与安慰剂或二甲双胍相比,ILS导致SHBG显著升高(绝经后女性:p<0.01)或下降幅度较小(男性:p<0.05;绝经前女性:p<0.01)。SHBG的变化主要归因于肥胖程度的改变。按治疗组或参与者群体划分,SHBG的变化与糖尿病风险之间没有一致的关联。
生活方式干预可能与循环SHBG的有利变化相关,这在很大程度上归因于肥胖程度的改变。循环SHBG的变化并不能独立预测糖尿病发病率的降低。