Broughton William M, Maconochie Ian K
University of Hertfordshire.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust.
Br Paramed J. 2019 Mar 1;3(4):8-14. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2019.03.3.4.8.
Ambulance service policy requires paramedics in certain parts of the UK to transport children aged 0-2 years to hospital, regardless of their presenting complaint. While there are a number of paediatric early warning scores (PEWS) that exist to detect deterioration in the hospitalised child, no study has considered the potential relationship between a PEWS recorded by the ambulance service and emergency department (ED) outcome. This study aims to evaluate and understand the potential utility of PEWS in an ambulance service setting.
A retrospective analysis of patient reports was undertaken, using data from the London Ambulance Service (LAS) and St Mary's Hospital, Paddington, collected over a 12-month period (June 2013 to June 2014). PEWS were calculated using LAS vital signs and compared against ED discharge outcomes.
From a randomised sample of 300 patient records, 169 were included in the final analysis. A total of 100/169 (59.2%) were discharged to home, 30 (17.8%) referred to their GP and 18 (10.7%) were admitted following assessment in the ED. A total of 87/169 had a PEWS of 1, with the vast majority of PEWS 1 (n = 64) resulting in discharge to home. showed low sensitivity (6.8-10.12%) across all scores. Specificity was high for lower scores, but positive predictive values (PPV) were low. also demonstrated low sensitivity (15.53-18.12%) but with higher specificity across all scores. PPV was high for scores > 2 and a PEWS of 2. showed higher sensitivity and specificity than other outcomes, with a PEWS of 2 demonstrating high sensitivity (61.07%), specificity (55.0%) and the PPV was 90%.
PEWS demonstrated high specificity, but poor sensitivity in all outcome measures. As a potential diagnostic test to predict ED outcome, in this study PEWS performed poorly. Further work is required to determine the utility of PEWS, or other early warning scores, for use in an out-of-hospital setting.
救护车服务政策要求英国某些地区的护理人员将0至2岁的儿童送往医院,无论其就诊症状如何。虽然有多种儿科早期预警评分(PEWS)可用于检测住院儿童的病情恶化情况,但尚无研究探讨救护车服务记录的PEWS与急诊科(ED)结局之间的潜在关系。本研究旨在评估并了解PEWS在救护车服务环境中的潜在效用。
采用回顾性分析患者报告,使用来自伦敦救护车服务中心(LAS)和帕丁顿圣玛丽医院在12个月期间(2013年6月至2014年6月)收集的数据。根据LAS生命体征计算PEWS,并与ED出院结局进行比较。
从300份患者记录的随机样本中,最终分析纳入了169份。共有100/169(59.2%)患者出院回家,30例(17.8%)转诊至全科医生处,18例(10.7%)在ED评估后入院。共有87/169的PEWS评分为1,绝大多数PEWS评分为1(n = 64)的患者出院回家。所有评分的敏感性均较低(6.8 - 10.12%)。较低评分的特异性较高,但阳性预测值(PPV)较低。 所有评分的敏感性也较低(15.53 - 18.12%),但特异性较高。评分>2和PEWS评分为2时PPV较高。 比其他结局显示出更高的敏感性和特异性,PEWS评分为2时敏感性高(61.07%)、特异性(55.0%)且PPV为90%。
PEWS在所有结局指标中显示出高特异性,但敏感性较差。作为预测ED结局的潜在诊断测试,本研究中PEWS表现不佳。需要进一步开展工作以确定PEWS或其他早期预警评分在院外环境中的效用。