de Groot Charlotte, Verstift Daniel E, Heisen Jelle, van Deurzen Derek F P, van den Bekerom Michel P J
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Trauma Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Joint Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Trauma Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Orthop Res Rev. 2023 Feb 16;15:1-12. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S340531. eCollection 2023.
Treatment of a patient with acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injury remains challenging for orthopedic surgeons. To date, there is debate over the optimal management of ACJ injuries. This review provides an overview of assessment, treatment, and future perspectives for the treatment of and research into ACJ.
A scoping literature review was performed. The search was built including the following terms: acromioclavicular joint injuries or dislocation, and pathophysiology, etiology, anatomy, treatment, and trauma mechanism. The papers with evidence levels 1-3 were included in the current narrative review.
A total of 2242 potential relevant studies were identified in the searches. After removal of duplicates, 432 studies were screened on their titles and abstracts, resulting in 35 studies being included in the review, based on the eligibility criteria.
The management of acute and chronic ACJ injuries is not clarified in the current literature. However, there is currently insufficient high-level evidence for the overall treatment options for ACJ injuries. If surgical intervention is decided upon in consultation with the patient, the complications may not outweigh the benefits. The multitude of existing techniques is indicative of the uncertainty surrounding this issue, and no gold standard has yet been established for treatment methods. An ideal classification would include not only vertical and horizontal instability, but also the severity of kinematic alterations of the shoulder complex. This indicates the need for a new and improved diagnostic tool for the classification of ACJ injuries.
对于骨科医生而言,治疗肩锁关节(ACJ)损伤患者仍然具有挑战性。迄今为止,关于ACJ损伤的最佳治疗方法存在争议。本综述概述了ACJ损伤的评估、治疗以及未来的治疗和研究前景。
进行了一项范围界定文献综述。搜索词包括:肩锁关节损伤或脱位、病理生理学、病因、解剖学、治疗和创伤机制。证据水平为1-3级的论文被纳入当前的叙述性综述。
在搜索中总共确定了2242项潜在相关研究。去除重复项后,对432项研究的标题和摘要进行了筛选,根据纳入标准,有35项研究被纳入综述。
目前的文献中尚未明确急性和慢性ACJ损伤的治疗方法。然而,目前对于ACJ损伤的总体治疗选择缺乏足够的高级别证据。如果与患者协商后决定进行手术干预,并发症可能不会超过益处。现有技术的多样性表明围绕这个问题存在不确定性,并且尚未建立治疗方法的金标准。理想的分类不仅应包括垂直和水平不稳定,还应包括肩部复合体运动学改变的严重程度。这表明需要一种新的、改进的诊断工具来对ACJ损伤进行分类。